Skip to main content

Theatre as a Moral Institution: Twentieth-Century Ireland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reconsidering National Plays in Europe

Abstract

Joep Leerssen discusses how theatre contributed to the formation of an independent Irish public sphere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, by examining William Butler Yeats’s Kathleen Ní Houlihan (1892/1912), J. M. Synge’s The Playboy of the Western World (1907) and Seán O’Casey’s The Plough and the Stars (1926). He concludes his contribution by presenting two late-twentieth-century plays, Brian Friel’s Translations (1980) and Frank McGuinness’s Observe the Sons of Ulster Marching Towards the Somme (1985), that both thematize the national tensions in Northern Ireland. Leerssen demonstrates that independence and the relationships between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, and Great Britain has been a recurrent theme not only in politics but in the theatre too, and in fact functions rather like a connective tissue between the plays examined. A similar focus can be seen in plays written during the struggle for independence in the early twentieth century as well as in plays written in the wake of ‘The Troubles’. The last play Leerssen discusses, McGuinness’s Observe the Sons of Ulster Marching Towards the Somme (1985) underlines once more the function of theatre as a moral institution. What is more, it shows that by openly discussing issues of identity and belonging a national play can contribute to the creation of a feeling of mutual understanding, and by doing so can present an inclusive notion of national identity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wilde , odd man out, ironically embraced middle-brow Labiche-style farces in his social satires (The Importance of Being Earnest and An Ideal Husband), and adopted a ‘decadent’ aestheticism in Salomé.

  2. 2.

    On what follows, generally my “Knotenpunkte. Wie Ibsen und Maeterlinck sich in Dublin in die Quere kamen”, In Literarische Transnationalität. Kulturelle Dreiecksbeziehungen zwischen Skandinavien, Deutschland und Frankreich im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. Karin Hoff, Anna Sandberg & Udo Schöningh (Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2015), 127–145 and “The Theatre of William Butler Yeats”, in The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Irish Drama, ed. Shaun Richards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 47–61.

  3. 3.

    There is a very substantial body of research on this remarkable synchronicity between the literary and cultural revival on the one hand and the radicalization of separatist nationalism on the other; starting with William Irwin Thompson , The Imagination of an Insurrection: Dublin, Easter 1916: A Study of an Ideological Movement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), and burgeoning in the run-up to the centenary commemorations of 2016 (e.g. Roy Foster , Vivid Faces: The Revolutionary Generation in Ireland, 1890–1923 (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015)).

  4. 4.

    The documentation is gathered in Robert Hogan & James Kilroy, eds. The Modern Irish Drama: A Documentary History, vols. 1–3 (Dublin: Dolmen, 1978–80). Also, Roy Foster, W.B. Yeats: A Life (2 vols.; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997–98). Yeats’s lines are from his 1938 poem ‘The man and the echo’.

  5. 5.

    I here combine insights by Gérard Genette, “Vraisemblance et Motivation”, in Id., Figures II. Essais (Paris: Seuil, 1969), 71–100, and Hans-Robert Jauss, Probleme des Verstehens: Ausgewählte Aufsätze (Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1999).

  6. 6.

    Quoted and discussed in my National Thought in Europe: A Cultural. 2nd ed. (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010), 96–97.

  7. 7.

    The moribund Gaelic language was rescued from extinction by the manifold activities of the Gaelic League. On the outlook of the Gaelic League, the best source is Philip O’Leary , The Prose Literature of the Gaelic Revival, 1881–1921. Ideology and Innovation (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994).

  8. 8.

    W.B. Yeats , “The Celtic Element in Literature” (1897), in W.B. Yeats , Essays and Introductions (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1961), 187.

  9. 9.

    In London, the innovation of the ‘literary’ theatre was driven to a large extent by Ibsenites: for example, J.T. Grein, whose production of Ibsen’s Ghosts Yeats had seen in 1891. Yeats appreciated Ibsen for his uncompromising literary high-mindedness and refusal of commercial opportunism; but Yeats’s literary sensibility was miles removed from Ibsen’s naturalism (though possibly more appreciative of early plays such as Brand and Peer Gynt); hence also his rivalry with the other Irishman on the London drama scene: the Ibsenite Shaw . Yeats leant more in the direction of the symbolism of Maeterlinck and Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, whose plays had mesmerized him during a visit to Paris, where these schools, naturalism and symbolism, were at daggers drawn. The art theatres of André Antoine and A.F. Lugné-Poe, the Théâtre Libre and the Théâtre de l’Œuvre, had split along more or less this aesthetic divide; but that antagonism was less obvious for the dramatic progressives in London, including their Dublin-rooted outrider Yeats . When J.T. Grein invited the Théâtre de l’Œuvre over to London in 1895, it offered a programme that consisted in equal parts of Maeterlinck (L’intruse, Pelléas et Mélisande) and Ibsen (Rosmersholm, Solnes le constructeur).

  10. 10.

    I have explored this cross-purpose further in my Remembrance and Imagination: Patterns in the Historical and Literary Representation of Ireland in the Nineteenth Century (Cork University Press, 1996), 207–223.

  11. 11.

    Mary Trotter, Ireland’s National Theaters: Political Performance and the Origins of the Irish Dramatic Movement (New York: Syracuse, 2001), 73–99. On the pre-history of the tableau vivant: Kristen Gram Holström, Monodrama, Attitudes, Tableaux vivants. Studies on Some Trends of Theatrical Fashion 1770–1815, Uppsala 1967.

  12. 12.

    Catherine Morris , “Becoming Irish? Alice Milligan and the Revival”, Irish University Review 31 no. 1 (2003), 79–98; Mark Phelan, “Beyond the Pale: Neglected Northern Irish Women Playwrights. Alice Milligan, Helen Waddell and Patricia O’Connor”, in M. Sihra, ed. Women in Irish Drama: A Century of Authorship and Representation (Basingstoke, 2007), 109–129.

  13. 13.

    Ann Rigney , “Do Apologies end Events? Bloody Sunday, 1972–2010”, in Afterlife of Events: Perspectives in Mnemohistory, ed. Marek Tamm (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 242–261.

  14. 14.

    Seamus Deane , ed. Ireland’s Field Day (London: Hutchinson, 1985); Richard Pine , Brian Friel and Ireland’s Drama (London: Routledge, 1990); Marilynn J. Richtarik, Acting Between the Lines: The Field Day Theatre Company and Irish Cultural Politics 1980–1984 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

  15. 15.

    Cf. John Andrews , A Paper Landscape. The Ordnance Survey in Nineteenth-Century Ireland (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975); Gillian M. Doherty, The Irish Ordnance Survey: History, Culture and Memory (Dublin: Four Courts, 2004). The allegorical aptitude of control over place-names applied, of course, first and foremost to the city where Field Day was based and where Translations was first performed. Traditionally called Derry (and still called so by Ulster Catholics and in the Republic of Ireland), the city was officially named Londonderry when given its Royal Charter in 1613, underlining its colonial adhesion to the British state (and still called so by Ulster protestants and in official British nomenclature); the city’s name is now a shibboleth of sectarian division.

  16. 16.

    Eventually collected as Ireland’s Great War (Dublin: Lilliput, 2014). On memory culture and the Memorial Garden, see Ann Rigney , “Divided pasts: A premature memorial and the dynamics of collective remembrance”, Memory Studies 1 (2008): 89–97.

Bibliography

  • Andrews, John. A Paper Landscape. The Ordnance Survey in Nineteenth-Century Ireland. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, Seamus, ed. Ireland’s Field Day. London: Hutchinson, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Gillian M. The Irish Ordnance Survey: History, Culture and Memory. Dublin: Four Courts, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Roy. Vivid Faces: The Revolutionary Generation in Ireland, 1890–1923. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. W.B. Yeats: A Life. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Robert, and James Kilroy, eds. The Modern Irish Drama: A Documentary History. Vol. 1–3. Dublin: Dolmen, 1978–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauss, Hans-Robert: Probleme des Verstehens: Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leerssen, Joep. “Knotenpunkte: Wie Ibsen und Maeterlinck sich in Dublin in die Quere kamen.” In Literarische Transnationalität: Kulturelle Dreiecksbeziehungen zwischen Skandinavien, Deutschland und Frankreich im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. Karin Hoff, Anna Sandberg, and Udo Schöningh. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2015: 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. National Thought in Europe: A Cultural History. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Remembrance and Imagination: Patterns in the Historical and Literary Representation of Ireland in the Nineteenth Century. Cork University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Theatre of William Butler Yeats.” In The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Irish Drama, ed. Shaun Richards, 47–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Catherine: “Becoming Irish? Alice Milligan and the Revival.” Irish University Review 31, no. 1 (2003): 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, Philip. The Prose Literature of the Gaelic Revival, 1881–1921. Ideology and Innovation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, Mark. “Beyond the Pale: Neglected Northern Irish Women Playwrights. Alice Milligan, Helen Waddell and Patricia O’Connor.” In Women in Irish Drama, ed. M. Sihra, 109–129. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, Richard. Brian Friel and Ireland’s Drama. London: Routledge, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richtarik, Marilynn J. Acting Between the Lines: The Field Day Theatre Company and Irish Cultural Politics 1980–1984. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, Ann. “Divided pasts: A premature memorial and the dynamics of collective remembrance.” Memory Studies 1 (2008): 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———: “Do Apologies End Events? Bloody Sunday, 1972–2010.” In Afterlife of Events: Perspectives in Mnemohistory, ed. Marek Tamm, 242–261. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, William Irwin. The Imagination of an Insurrection: Dublin, Easter 1916: A Study of an Ideological Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, Mary. Ireland’s National Theaters: Political Performance and the Origins of the Irish Dramatic Movement, 73–99. New York: Syracuse, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joep Leerssen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leerssen, J. (2018). Theatre as a Moral Institution: Twentieth-Century Ireland. In: van der Poll, S., van der Zalm, R. (eds) Reconsidering National Plays in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75334-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics