Skip to main content

General Considerations for Regional Anesthesia Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials of Regional Anesthesia

Abstract

Setting up a regional anesthesia service requires a reliable and consistent product as well as a sound business plan. Technological advances in nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance, and perineural catheters have led to rapid growth in the number and types of peripheral nerve block procedures available to regional anesthesia practitioners. Starting a new regional anesthesia program potentially adds monetary value to a facility’s perioperative services by improving the quality of postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery, thereby reducing perioperative costs and offering a competitive advantage over other surgical facilities. From the patient’s perspective, a regional anesthesia program provides nonmonetary value by preventing pain and reducing the risk of nausea and vomiting after surgery. The goal of this chapter is to provide initial guidance to the anesthesiologist interested in starting a new regional anesthesiology and acute pain program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams BA, Kentor ML, Vogt MT, Vogt WB, Coley KC, Williams JP, et al. Economics of nerve block pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: potential hospital cost savings via associated postanesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:697–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ilfeld BM, Mariano ER, Williams BA, Woodard JN, Macario A. Hospitalization costs of total knee arthroplasty with a continuous femoral nerve block provided only in the hospital versus on an ambulatory basis: a retrospective, case-control, cost-minimization analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:46–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonano C, Kettner SC, Ernstbrunner M, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Marhofer P. Comparison of economical aspects of interscalene brachial plexus blockade and general anaesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(3):428–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saporito A, Calciolari S, Ortiz LG, Anselmi L, Borgeat A, Aguirre J. A cost analysis of orthopedic foot surgery: can outpatient continuous regional analgesia provide the same standard of care for postoperative pain control at home without shifting costs? Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(8):951–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ilfeld BM, Gearen PF, Enneking FK, Berry LF, Spadoni EH, George SZ, et al. Total knee arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using continuous femoral nerve blocks at home: a prospective feasibility study. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ilfeld BM, Gearen PF, Enneking FK, Berry LF, Spadoni EH, George SZ, et al. Total hip arthroplasty as an overnight-stay procedure using an ambulatory continuous psoas compartment nerve block: a prospective feasibility study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:113–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ilfeld BM, Vandenborne K, Duncan PW, Sessler DI, Enneking FK, Shuster JJ, et al. Ambulatory continuous interscalene nerve blocks decrease the time to discharge readiness after total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:999–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung F, Mezei G. Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1352–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadzic A, Williams BA, Karaca PE, Hobeika P, Unis G, Dermksian J, et al. For outpatient rotator cuff surgery, nerve block anesthesia provides superior same-day recovery over general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1001–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadzic A, Karaca PE, Hobeika P, Unis G, Dermksian J, Yufa M, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks result in superior recovery profile compared with general anesthesia in outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:976–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B, Karaca PE, Yufa M, Claudio RE, et al. A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist day-case surgeries. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:652–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein SM, Nielsen KC, Greengrass RA, Warner DS, Martin A, Steele SM. Ambulatory discharge after long-acting peripheral nerve blockade: 2382 blocks with ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:65–70, table of contents.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamieson BD, Mariano ER. Thoracic and lumbar paravertebral blocks for outpatient lithotripsy. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:149–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mariano ER, Watson D, Loland VJ, Chu LF, Cheng GS, Mehta SH, et al. Bilateral infraorbital nerve blocks decrease postoperative pain but do not reduce time to discharge following outpatient nasal surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56(8):584–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1402–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant SA, Nielsen KC, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, Klein SM. Continuous peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen KC, Greengrass RA, Pietrobon R, Klein SM, Steele SM. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade provides good analgesia at home after major shoulder surgery-report of four cases. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bryan NA, Swenson JD, Greis PE, Burks RT. Indwelling interscalene catheter use in an outpatient setting for shoulder surgery: technique, efficacy, and complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:388–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Swenson JD, Bay N, Loose E, Bankhead B, Davis J, Beals TC, et al. Outpatient management of continuous peripheral nerve catheters placed using ultrasound guidance: an experience in 620 patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1436–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, Chidgey LK, Enneking FK. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:1089–95, table of contents.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, Enneking FK. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(4):959–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariano ER, Afra R, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, et al. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block via an ultrasound-guided posterior approach: a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1688–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi S, Rodseth R, McCartney JL. Effects of dexamethasone as a local anesthetic adjuvant for brachial plexus block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(3):427–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woo JH, Kim YJ, Kim DY, Cho S. Dose-dependency of dexamethasone on the analgesic effect of interscalene block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery using ropivacaine 0.5%: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(9):650–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ilfeld BM, Wright TW, Enneking FK, Vandenborne K. Total elbow arthroplasty as an outpatient procedure using a continuous infraclavicular nerve block at home: a prospective case report. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006;31:172–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ilfeld BM, Wright TW, Enneking FK, Mace JA, Shuster JJ, Spadoni EH, et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty as an outpatient procedure using ambulatory perineural local anesthetic infusion: a pilot feasibility study. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1319–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Oldman M, McCartney CJ, Leung A, Rawson R, Perlas A, Gadsden J, et al. A survey of orthopedic surgeons’ attitudes and knowledge regarding regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1486–90, table of contents.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mariano ER, Chu LF, Peinado CR, Mazzei WJ. Anesthesia-controlled time and turnover time for ambulatory upper extremity surgery performed with regional versus general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:253–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T. Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ayalon O, Liu S, Flics S, Cahill J, Juliano K, Cornell CN. A multimodal clinical pathway can reduce length of stay after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2011;7(1):9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Corey JM, Bulka CM, Ehrenfeld JM. Is regional anesthesia associated with reduced PACU length of stay?: a retrospective analysis from a tertiary medical center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dexter F, Macario A, Manberg PJ, Lubarsky DA. Computer simulation to determine how rapid anesthetic recovery protocols to decrease the time for emergence or increase the phase I postanesthesia care unit bypass rate affect staffing of an ambulatory surgery center. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1053–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1487–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Greger J, Williams BA. Billing for outpatient regional anesthesia services in the United States. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2005;43:33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerancher JC, Viscusi ER, Liguori GA, McCartney CJ, Williams BA, Ilfeld BM, et al. Development of a standardized peripheral nerve block procedure note form. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:67–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mariano ER. Making it work: setting up a regional anesthesia program that provides value. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:681–92, vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hebl JR, Kopp SL, Ali MH, Horlocker TT, Dilger JA, Lennon RL, et al. A comprehensive anesthesia protocol that emphasizes peripheral nerve blockade for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 2):63–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mariano ER, Cheng GS, Choy LP, Loland VJ, Bellars RH, Sandhu NS, et al. Electrical stimulation versus ultrasound guidance for popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:480–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Bellars RH, Sandhu NS, Bishop ML, Abrams RA, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus electrical stimulation for infraclavicular brachial plexus perineural catheter insertion. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1211–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, Afra R, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus electrical stimulation for femoral perineural catheter insertion. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1453–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Bellars RH, Bishop ML, Meunier MJ, et al. A trainee-based randomized comparison of stimulating interscalene perineural catheters with a new technique using ultrasound guidance alone. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sites BD, Chan VW, Neal JM, Weller R, Grau T, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, et al. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:40–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sites BD, Gallagher JD, Cravero J, Lundberg J, Blike G. The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29:544–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hadzic A, Vloka JD, Kuroda MM, Koorn R, Birnbach DJ. The practice of peripheral nerve blocks in the United States: a national survey [p2e comments]. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23:241–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Smith MP, Sprung J, Zura A, Mascha E, Tetzlaff JE. A survey of exposure to regional anesthesia techniques in American anesthesia residency training programs. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:11–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Young A, Buvanendran A. Recent advances in multimodal analgesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Richman JM, Stearns JD, Rowlingson AJ, Wu CL, McFarland EG. The introduction of a regional anesthesia rotation: effect on resident education and operating room efficiency. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:240–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Martin G, Lineberger CK, MacLeod DB, El-Moalem HE, Breslin DS, Hardman D, et al. A new teaching model for resident training in regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1423–7, table of contents.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine Fellowship Directors Group. Guidelines for fellowship training in regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine: third edition, 2014. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Armstrong KP, Cherry RA. Brachial plexus anesthesia compared to general anesthesia when a block room is available. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51:41–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Drolet P, Girard M. Regional anesthesia, block room and efficiency: putting things in perspective. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ilfeld BM, Esener DE, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Ambulatory perineural infusion: the patients’ perspective. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ilfeld BM, Enneking FK. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks at home: a review. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1822–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ninger LJ, Patterson P. Regional anesthesia has strong outcomes for care, efficiencies. OR Manager. 2004;20(1):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Williams BA, DeRiso BM, Engel LB, Figallo CM, Anders JW, Sproul KA, et al. Benchmarking the perioperative process: II. Introducing anesthesia clinical pathways to improve processes and outcomes and to reduce nursing labor intensity in ambulatory orthopedic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1998;10:561–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Edward R. Mariano and Karley J. Mariano for their significant contribution to the prior edition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Gritsenko MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review Questions

Review Questions

  1. 1.

    Regarding the ways regional anesthesia provides “value” to an institution, all are true except:

    1. (a)

      Improving patient satisfaction with pain control and postoperative recovery

    2. (b)

      Creating a competitive edge versus other anesthesia groups and surgery centers

    3. (c)

      Reducing perioperative costs by decreasing the acuity of patients recovering from surgery and ensuring same-day discharge

    4. (d)

      Immediately generating new revenue

  2. 2.

    The cause of prolonged post anesthesia recovery is:

    1. (a)

      Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    2. (b)

      Acute postoperative pain

    3. (c)

      Multifactorial

    4. (d)

      Acute chronic pain

  3. 3.

    According to the study by Macario and colleagues, which side effect from anesthesia do patients most prefer to avoid?

    1. (a)

      Vomiting

    2. (b)

      Nausea

    3. (c)

      Pain

    4. (d)

      Gagging on the endotracheal tube

  4. 4.

    When considering regional anesthesia “customers,” which of the following groups is most important?

    1. (a)

      Patients

    2. (b)

      Hospital administrators

    3. (c)

      Surgeons

    4. (d)

      Anesthesiology colleagues

  5. 5.

    Cost savings in the postoperative period attributable to regional anesthesia may result from all of the following except:

    1. (a)

      Reducing PACU length of stay

    2. (b)

      Avoiding unplanned hospitalization

    3. (c)

      Decreasing the patient to nurse ratio in PACU for bypass-eligible patients

    4. (d)

      Minimizing the need for pharmacologic interventions by PACU nurses

  6. 6.

    When designing the analgesic pathway for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, which of the following is false?

    1. (a)

      Intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia is typically administered on an inpatient basis.

    2. (b)

      Continuous nerve blocks may be managed effectively on an outpatient basis.

    3. (c)

      Epidural analgesia with local anesthetic solutions is most commonly maintained in the hospital setting.

    4. (d)

      None of the above.

  7. 7.

    Effectively billing for regional anesthesia procedures indicated for postoperative pain should involve which of the following?

    1. (a)

      Appropriate CPT coding.

    2. (b)

      Using a separate procedure note.

    3. (c)

      Including the distinct procedure modifier.

    4. (d)

      All of the above.

  8. 8.

    In a care team anesthesia delivery model, regional anesthesia may operate in the most efficient manner when:

    1. (a)

      Anesthesiologists are not familiar with regional anesthesia techniques

    2. (b)

      Equipment required for regional anesthesia is not centralized

    3. (c)

      Patients eligible for regional anesthesia are processed in “parallel”

    4. (d)

      Patients first learn about regional anesthesia on the day of surgery

  9. 9.

    When managing continuous nerve block catheters at home, which of the following is true?

    1. (a)

      Patients require a home nurse.

    2. (b)

      Patients must return to the hospital for catheter removal.

    3. (c)

      Patients should be called at home three times a day.

    4. (d)

      Patients should receive clear written and verbal instructions as well as contact information for a healthcare provider.

  10. 10.

    The clinical care team involved with managing patients with continuous regional anesthesia catheters should include:

    1. (a)

      Nursing

    2. (b)

      Pharmacists

    3. (c)

      Anesthesiologists

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  11. 11.

    Developing positive physician–nurse interactions when implementing a regional anesthesia program requires knowledge of all of the following except:

    1. (a)

      Collaboration

    2. (b)

      Assertiveness

    3. (c)

      Autonomy

    4. (d)

      Education

  12. 12.

    An nursing education program for regional anesthesia should include a discussion of:

    1. (a)

      Functional anatomy and physiology of nerve blockade

    2. (b)

      Expected effects of local anesthetics

    3. (c)

      Anticipated areas of pain not covered by blocks

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  13. 13.

    Nurses are most likely to call a physician about a regional anesthesia patient when:

    1. (a)

      They are familiar with the situation and suspect that something is wrong

    2. (b)

      They are bored

    3. (c)

      They are faced with a new situation beyond their comfort level and request guidance

    4. (d)

      (a) and (b)

  14. 14.

    Implementing a new regional anesthesia service requires all of the following except:

    1. (a)

      A master’s degree in business administration (x)

    2. (b)

      Specialized training in regional anesthesia

    3. (c)

      Teamwork

    4. (d)

      Effective communication

  15. 15.

    A “block room” requires all of the following except:

    1. (a)

      Oxygen source

    2. (b)

      Anesthesia machine (x)

    3. (c)

      Standard ASA monitors

    4. (d)

      Regional anesthesia supplies

  16. 16.

    Ambulatory patients discharged home after a single-injection peripheral nerve block with a long-acting local anesthetic:

    1. (a)

      Have reliable resolution of sensory and motor blockade within 12 h of block placement

    2. (b)

      Should receive a follow-up phone call the next week to assess for block resolution, adequacy of pain relief, and overall satisfaction with postoperative recovery

    3. (c)

      Should be discharged with a protective sling if they had an upper extremity block

    4. (d)

      Should be discharged home with a knee immobilizer if they had an adductor canal block

  17. 17.

    All of the following need to be completed prior to peripheral nerve block placement except:

    1. (a)

      Patient attends informational session prior to day of surgery that includes an introduction to regional anesthesia techniques employed.

    2. (b)

      Surgical consent and block consent signed by patient.

    3. (c)

      Anesthesia assessment completed.

    4. (d)

      Extremity to be blocked is marked by both surgeon and anesthesiologist.

  18. 18.

    New CPT codes for TAP blocks introduced in 2016:

    1. (a)

      Delineate between single injection and continuous infusion and unilateral or bilateral procedures

    2. (b)

      Include ultrasound imaging guidance

    3. (c)

      Can be used to bill for rectus sheath blocks

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  19. 19.

    Specialty training in regional anesthesiology techniques can be obtained:

    1. (a)

      During residency

    2. (b)

      By completing a Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Fellowship

    3. (c)

      By taking continuing medical education courses dedicated to regional anesthesia

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  20. 20.

    Staffing a new regional anesthesia service includes training or hiring:

    1. (a)

      Anesthesiology physicians trained in regional techniques

    2. (b)

      Midlevel providers to assist with perioperative care and follow-ups

    3. (c)

      A separate billing specialist

    4. (d)

      (a) and (b)

Answers:

  1. 1.

    d

  2. 2.

    c

  3. 3.

    a

  4. 4.

    a

  5. 5.

    c

  6. 6.

    d

  7. 7.

    d

  8. 8.

    c

  9. 9.

    d

  10. 10.

    d

  11. 11.

    b

  12. 12.

    d

  13. 13.

    d

  14. 14.

    a

  15. 15.

    b

  16. 16.

    c

  17. 17.

    a

  18. 18.

    d

  19. 19.

    d

  20. 20.

    d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kurteva, S., Muse, I.O., Gritsenko, K. (2018). General Considerations for Regional Anesthesia Practice. In: Kaye, A., Urman, R., Vadivelu, N. (eds) Essentials of Regional Anesthesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74838-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74838-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74837-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74838-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics