Skip to main content

Hemodynamic Evaluation and Minimally Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Cancer Patients

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Oncologic Critical Care

Abstract

The cancer and cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical interventions, have crucial adverse cardiovascular effects. The hemodynamic problems are associated with direct cardiovascular complications of cancer, cancer-related complications, and complications from cancer therapy. Thus, these cancer patients have high burdens of severe, disabling, or life-threatening illnesses. The impacts involve all dimensions of hemodynamic function according to preload, contractility, afterload, cardiac rhythms, pulmonary circulation, and myocardial oxygen balance. Therefore, it is necessary to have careful hemodynamic evaluation before, during, and even after the ending of treatment. The integration of clinical evaluation and hemodynamic monitoring can lead to better understanding of pathophysiology and guide effective management. Hemodynamic monitoring in oncologic critically ill patients should involve both macro-hemodynamic and microcirculation parameters in order to achieve a better result of the resuscitation. The first step of monitoring is to recognize patients with circulatory insufficiency (hypotension, low cardiac output, tissue hypoperfusion) and then using any functional hemodynamic monitoring that is proper to individual patient to figure the fluid responsiveness. In non-fluid responder, the minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring and basic echocardiography will play an important role to identify specific causes (e.g., cardiac tamponade) and adjust vasopressor and inotrope titration. Finally, microcirculation monitoring like lactate clearance should be used to tract a result of resuscitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beigel R, Cercek B, Arsanjani R, Siegel RJ. Echocardiography in the use of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring. J Crit Care. 2014;29:184.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogolioubov A, Keefe DL, Groeger JS. Circulatory shock. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17:697–719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Braunwald E, Bonow RO. Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dettmer M, Holthaus CV, Fuller BM. The impact of serial lactate monitoring on emergency department resuscitation interventions and clinical outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational cohort study. Shock. 2015;43:55–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Esquivias GB, Asteggiano R. Cardiac management of oncology patients: clinical handbook for cardio-oncology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1834–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forrester JS, Ganz W, Diamond G, McHugh T, Chonette DW, Swan HJC. Thermodilution cardiac output determination with a single flow-directed catheter. Am Heart J. 1972;83:306–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gore JM, Goldberg RJ, Spodick DH, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. A community-wide assessment of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chest. 1987;92:721–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrmann J, Lerman A, Sandhu NP, Villarraga HR, Mulvagh SL, Kohli M. Evaluation and management of patients with heart disease and cancer: cardio-oncology. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89:1287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keefe DL. Cardiovascular emergencies in the cancer patient. Semin Oncol. 2000;27:244–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi M, Koh M, Irinoda T, Meguro E, Hayakawa Y, Takagane A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of intravascular volume depression and possible hypotension during the early postoperative period after esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1371–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Legrand G, Ruscio L, Benhamou D, Pelletier-Fleury N. Goal-directed fluid therapy guided by cardiac monitoring during high-risk abdominal surgery in adult patients: cost-effectiveness analysis of esophageal Doppler and arterial pulse pressure waveform analysis. Value Health. 2015;18:605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J, Roche AM, Eisenstein EL, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Moon RE, Gan TJ. Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:1052–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1402–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mostert JW. Fick principle invalid in pathophysiology. S Afr Med J. 1983;63:471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naik BI, Durieux ME. Hemodynamic monitoring devices: putting it all together. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:477–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinsky MR. Understanding preload reserve using functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:1480–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Repesse X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A. Intensive care ultrasound: V. Goal-directed echocardiography. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:122–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:843–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shenoy S, Shetty S, Lankala S, Anwer F, Yeager A, Adigopula S. Cardiovascular Oncologic Emergencies. Cardiology. 2017;138:147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun Y, Chai F, Pan C, Romeiser JL, Gan TJ. Effect of perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2017;21:141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng K, Li Y, Liang M, Gao Y, Cai H, Lin C. The influence of goal-directed fluid therapy on the prognosis of elderly patients with hypertension and gastric cancer surgery. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:2113–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phornlert Chatrkaw .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Chatrkaw, P., Kumwilaisak, K. (2019). Hemodynamic Evaluation and Minimally Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Cancer Patients. In: Nates, J., Price, K. (eds) Oncologic Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74698-2_65-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74698-2_65-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74698-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74698-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics