Abstract
Annihilation momentum densities and vertex enhancement factors for positron annihilation on valence and core electrons of noble-gas atoms are calculated using many-body theory for s, p and d-wave positrons of momenta up to the positronium-formation threshold. The enhancement factors parametrize the effects of short-range electron-positron correlations which increase the annihilation probability beyond the independent-particle approximation. For all positron partial waves and electron subshells, the enhancement factors are found to be relatively insensitive to the positron momentum. The enhancement factors for the core electron orbitals are also almost independent of the positron angular momentum. The largest enhancement factor (\({\sim }10\)) is found for the 5p orbital in Xe, while the values for the core orbitals are typically \({\sim }1.5\).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Positron annihilation with core electrons is also affected by exchange-assisted tunnelling [26, 27]. This is a manifestation of electron exchange, which increases the wavefunctions of inner electrons in the range of distances of the valence electrons. For this effect to be properly included in a calculation, one needs to use true nonlocal exchange potentials, e.g., at the Hartree-Fock level, as is the case in the present calculations.
- 2.
Alternatively to the Doppler-shift spectrum, experiments measure the one-dimensional angular correlation of annihilation radiation (1D-ACAR), i.e., the small angle \(\varTheta \) between the direction of one photon and the plane containing the other. The corresponding distribution can be obtained from \(w(\varepsilon )\) using \(\varTheta =2\epsilon /mc^2\). Not also that if the positron wavefunction is constant, then the annihilation momentum density is proportional to the electron momentum density, and the \(\gamma \) spectrum becomes similar to the Compton profile [22, 23, 41].
- 3.
In this and subsequent sections we make wide use of atomic units (a.u.).
- 4.
- 5.
The term in braces can also be compared with the expression for the natural geminal corresponding to the positron state \(\varepsilon \) and electron orbital n, \(\alpha _{\varepsilon n}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r})=\sqrt{\gamma _{\varepsilon n}(\mathbf{r})}\psi _{\varepsilon }(\mathbf{r})\varphi _n(\mathbf{r})\) (cf. Eq. (9) in Ref. [34]), which can be used to determine the position dependent EF \(\gamma _{\varepsilon n}(\mathbf{r})\), see Sect. 4.
- 6.
For HF positron wavefunctions the values of the parameters are \(A=1.54~\text {a.u.}=42.0~\text {eV}\), \(B=0.92~\text {a.u.}=24.9~\text {eV}\), and \(\beta =2.54\). For Dyson positron wavefunctions the values are \(A=1.31~\text {a.u.}=35.7~\text {eV}\), \(B=0.83~\text {a.u.}=22.7~\text {eV}\), and \(\beta =2.15\) [24].
References
Asoka-Kumar P, Alatalo M, Ghosh V, Kruseman A, Nielsen B, Lynn K (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:2097. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2097
Lynn KG, MacDonald JR, Boie RA, Feldman LC, Gabbe JD, Robbins MF, Bonderup E, Golovchenko J (1977) Phys Rev Lett 38:241. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.241
Iwata K, Gribakin GF, Greaves RG, Surko CM (1997) Phys Rev Lett 79:39. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.39
Lynn K, Dickman J, Brown W, Robbins M, Bonderup E (1979) Phys Rev B 20:3566. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.3566
Alatalo M, Barbiellini B, Hakala M, Kauppinen H, Korhonen T, Puska M, Saarinen K, Hautojärvi P, Nieminen R (1996) Phys Rev B 54:2397. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.2397
Tuomisto F, Makkonen I (2013) Rev Mod Phys 85:1583. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1583
Weiss A, Mayer R, Jibaly M, Lei C, Mehl D, Lynn KG (1988) Phys Rev Lett 61:2245. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2245
Ohdaira T, Suzuki R, Mikado T, Ohgaki H, Chiwaki M, Yamazaki T (1997) Appl Surf Sci 116:177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(96)01049-5
Weiss AH, Fazleev NG, Nadesalingam MP, Mukherjee S, Xie S, Zhu J, Davis BR (2007) Radiat Phys Chem 76:285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.03.053
Mayer J, Hugenschmidt C, Schreckenbach K (2010) Surf Sci 604:1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2010.07.003
Hugenschmidt C (2016) Surf Sci Rep 71:547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2016.09.002
Hugenschmidt C, Lwe B, Mayer J, Piochacz C, Pikart P, Repper R, Stadlbauer M, Schreckenbach K (2008) Nucl Instrum Methods A 593:616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.038
Mayer J, Hugenschmidt C, Schreckenbach K (2010) Phys Rev Lett 105:207401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.207401
Stoll H, Koch KMM, Major J (1991) Nucl Instrum Methods B 582:56
Coleman P (ed) (2000) Positron beams and their applications. World Scientific
Sano Y, Kino Y, Oka T, Sekine T (2015) J Phys Conf Ser 618:012010. http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/618/i=1/a=012010
Jensen KO, Weiss A (1990) Phys Rev B 41:3928. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3928
Iwata K, Greaves RG, Murphy TJ, Tinkle MD, Surko CM (1995) Phys Rev A 51:473. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.51.473
Green DG, Ludlow JA, Gribakin GF (2014) Phys Rev A 90:032712. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032712
Dunlop LJM, Gribakin GF (2006) J Phys B 39:1647. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/39/7/008
Green DG, Gribakin GF (2013) Phys Rev A 88:032708. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.032708
Green DG, Saha S, Wang F, Gribakin GF, Surko CM (2010) Mater Sci Forum 666:21. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.666.21
Green DG, Saha S, Wang F, Gribakin GF, Surko CM (2012) New J Phys 14:035021. http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/14/i=3/a=035021
Green DG, Gribakin GF (2015) Phys Rev Lett 114:093201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.093201
Bonderup E, Andersen JU, Lowy DN (1979) Phys Rev B 20:883. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.883
Flambaum VV (2009) Phys Rev A 79:042505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042505
Kozlov MG, Flambaum VV (2013) Phys Rev A 87:042511. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042511
Kahana S (1963) Phys Rev 129:1622. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.1622
Carbotte JP (1967) Phys Rev 155:197. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.155.197
Boroński E, Nieminen R (1986) Phys Rev B 34:3820. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.3820
Puska MJ, Nieminen RM (1994) Rev Mod Phys 66:841. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.841
Arponen J, Pajanne E (1979) Ann Phys 121:343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(79)90101-5
Mitroy J, Barbiellini B (2002) Phys Rev B 65:235103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.235103
Makkonen I, Ervasti MM, Siro T, Harju A (2014) Phys Rev B 89:041105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.041105
Daniuk S, Kontrym-Sznajd G, Rubaszek A, Stachowiak H, Mayers J, Walters PA, West RN (1987) J Phys F: Metal Phys 17:1365. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/17/6/011
Jarlborg T, Singh AK (1987) Phys Rev B 36:4660. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.36.4660
Rubaszek A , Stachowiak H (1984) Physica Status Solidi (B) 124:159. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221240117
Zubiaga A, Ervasti MM, Makkonen I, Harju A, Tuomisto F, Puska MJ (2016) J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys 49:064005
Swann AR, Green DG, Gribakin GF arXiv: 1709.00394
Berestetskii VB, Lifshitz EM, Pitaevskii LP (1982) Quantum electrodynamics, 2nd edn. Pergamon, Oxford
Kaijser P, Smith Jr VH (1977) Adv Quantum Chem 10:37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60578-X
Fraser PA (1968) Adv At Mol Phys 4:63
Pomeranchuk I, Eksp Zh (1949) Teor Fiz 19:183
Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV, King WA, Miller BN, Sushkov OP (1993) Phys Scripta T46:248. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/1993/T46/039
Dzuba VA, Flambaum VV, Gribakin GF, King WA (1996) J Phys B 29:3151. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/29/14/024
Surko CM, Gribakin GF, Buckman SJ (2005) J Phys B 38:R57. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/38/6/R01
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1977). Quantum mechanics (Non-relativistic theory). In: Course of theoretical physics, 3rd edn, vol 3. Pergamon, Oxford
Gribakin GF, Ludlow J (2004) Phys Rev A 70:032720. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.032720
Green DG (2011) PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast
Green DG, Gribakin GF (2015) arXiv:1502.08045
Abrikosov AA, Gorkov LP, Dzyalonshinkski IE (1975) Methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics. Dover, New York
Fetter AL, Walecka JD (2003) Quantum theory of many-particle systems. Dover, New York
Dickhoff WH, Neck DV (2008) Many body theory exposed!—Propagator description of quantum mechanics in many-body systems, 2nd edn. World Scientific, Singapore
Bell JS, Squires EJ (1959) Phys Rev Lett 3:96. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.96
Amusia MY, Cherepkov NA (1975) Case studies in atomic physics 5:47
Goldanski VI, Sayasov YS (1968) Phys Lett 13:300
Arponen J, Pajanne E (1979) J Phys F 9:2359. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/9/12/009
Barbiellini B, Puska MJ, Torsti T, Nieminen RM (1995) Phys Rev B 51:7341. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.7341
Stachowiak H, Lach J (1993) Phys Rev B 48:9828. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.9828
Daniuk S, Kontrym-Sznajd G, Rubaszek A, Stachowiak H, Mayers J, Walters PA, West RN (1987) J Phys F 17:1365. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/17/6/011
Jensen KO (1989) J Phys Condens Matter 1:10595. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/1/51/027
Alatalo M, Kauppinen H, Saarinen K, Puska MJ, Mäkinen J, Hautojärvi P, Nieminen RM (1995) Phys Rev B 51:4176. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.4176
Barbiellini B, Puska MJ, Alatalo M, Hakala M, Harju A, Korhonen T, Siljamäki S, Torsti T, Nieminen RM (1997) Appl Surf Sci 116:283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(96)01070-7
Barbiellini B, Hakala M, Puska MJ, Nieminen RM, Manuel AA (1997) Phys Rev B 56:7136. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.7136
Makkonen I, Hakala M, Puska MJ (2006) Phys Rev B 73:035103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.035103
Kuriplach J, Morales AL, Dauwe C, Segers D, Šob M (1998) Phys Rev B 58:10475. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.10475
Ludlow J (2003) PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast
Gribakin GF, Ludlow J (2002) Phys Rev Lett 88:163202. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.163202
Iwata K, Greaves RG, Surko CM (1997) Phys Rev A 55:3586. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.55.3586
Mitroy J, Ivanov IA (2001) Phys Rev A 65:012509. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012509
Gribakin GF, Young JA, Surko CM (2010) Rev Mod Phys 82:2557. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2557
Tachikawa M (2014) J Phys Conf Ser 488:012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/488/1/012053
Dzuba VA, Kozlov A, Flambaum VV (2014) Phys Rev A 89:042507. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042507
Acknowledgements
DGG is supported by a United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Fellowship, grant number EP/N007948/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Green, D.G., Gribakin, G.F. (2018). Enhancement Factors for Positron Annihilation on Valence and Core Orbitals of Noble-Gas Atoms. In: Wang, Y., Thachuk, M., Krems, R., Maruani, J. (eds) Concepts, Methods and Applications of Quantum Systems in Chemistry and Physics. Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74582-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74582-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74581-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74582-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)