Skip to main content

Necessary Governing Practices for the Success (and Failure) of Client-Supplier Innovation Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation and Supply Chain Management

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

This chapter aims to empirically identify governance practices that are critical for the success of client-supplier innovation cooperation. To do so, we use Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) to screen a large panel of contractual provisions and coordination practices that are theoretically recognized as influencing relationship performance. Based on survey data describing 160 client-supplier relationships on an innovation project, we empirically determine which of these practices are conducive to highest or lowest performing relationship performance. We identify 12 practices—including the necessity of considering a client/supplier as a key account, and regular involvement of the client’s purchasing function—that are critical for creating a high-performing relationship, and 12 that lead to a low-performing relationship—that is, those that should be avoided. Our results provide deeper knowledge of the governance of client-supplier innovation cooperation, thanks to the paradigm change driven by the NCA approach. They also provide direct practical implications: practices to promote or to avoid in order to maximize successful innovation cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alreck PL, Settle RB (1985) The survey research handbook, vol 2. Irwin, Homewood IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers M (2012) Knowledge sharing in open innovation: an overview of theoretical perspectives on collaborative innovation. SSRN eLibrary

    Google Scholar 

  • Brattström A, Richtnér A (2013) Good cop—bad cop: trust, control, and the lure of integration. J Prod Innov Manag 31(3):584–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braumoeller BF, Goertz G (2000) The methodology of necessary conditions. Am J Polit Sci 44(4):844–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler L, Hemmert M (2015) The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: evidence from Korea. Technovation 45–46:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (2014) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA Jr (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauss T, Spieth P (2016) Treat your suppliers right! Aligning strategic innovation orientation in captive supplier relationships with relational and transactional governance mechanisms. R&D Manag 46(S3):1044–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das TK, Teng B-S (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. J Manag 26(1):31–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker HC (2004) Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Acc Organ Soc 29(1):27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz YL (1987) Technology partnerships between larger and smaller firms: some critical issues. Int Stud Manag Organ 17(4):31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz YL (1996) The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes? Strateg Manag J 17:55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul J (2015) Necessary condition analysis (NCA): logic and methodology of “necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organ Res Methods 19(1):10–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul J, Hak T, Goertz G, Voss C (2010) Necessary condition hypotheses in operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30(11):1170–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge P, Garrette B, Mitchell W (2000) How to get the best results from alliances. Eur Bus Forum 3:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(4):660–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz G, Hak T, Dul J (2013) Ceilings and floors where are there no observations? Sociol Methods Res 42(1):3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, IMP Project Group (1982) International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods: an interaction approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman A, Johnston WJ (2010) The impact of coercive and non-coercive forms of influence on trust, commitment, and compliance in supply chains. Ind Mark Manag 39(3):519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap SD (2001) “Pie Sharing” in complex collaboration contexts. J Mark Res 38(1):86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen TE (2009) Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: taking stock and looking to the future. J Purch Supply Manag 15(3):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen TE, Johnsen RE, Lamming RC (2008) Supply relationship evaluation: the relationship assessment process (RAP) and beyond. Eur Manag J 26(4):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppila O-P (2014) Alliance management capability and firm performance: using resource-based theory to look inside the process black box. Long Range Plan 48(3):151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohtamäki M, Vesalainen J, Henneberg S, Naudé P, Ventresca MJ (2012) Enabling relationship structures and relationship performance improvement: the moderating role of relational capital. Ind Mark Manag 41(8):1298–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakemond N, Berggren C (2006) Co-locating NPD? The need for combining project focus and organizational integration. Technovation 26(7):807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakemond N, Berggren C, van Weele A (2006) Coordinating supplier involvement in product development projects: a differentiated coordination typology. R&D Manag 36(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen LN, Andersen PH (2016) Supplier involvement in NPD: a quasi-experiment at Unilever. Ind Mark Manag 58:162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Dain M, Merminod V (2014) A knowledge sharing framework for black, grey and white box supplier configurations in new product development. Technovation 34(11):688–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Dain M, Calvi R, Cheriti S (2011) Measuring supplier performance in collaborative design: proposition of a framework. R&D Manag 41(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler D, Leverick F, Bruce M (1995) Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: a study of UK manufacturers of information and communications technology products. J Prod Innov Manag 12(1):16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniak R, Midler C (2008) Shifting from co-development to co-innovation. Int J Automot Technol Manag 8(4):449–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil IR (1980) The new social contract: an inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Melander L, Lakemond N (2014) Variation of purchasing’s involvement: case studies of supplier collaborations in new product development. Int J Procurement Manag 7:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melander L, Rosell D, Lakemond N (2014) In pursuit of control: involving suppliers of critical technologies in new product development. Supply Chain Manag 19(5/6):722–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollet J, Rebolledo C, Popel V (2012) Becoming a preferred customer one step at a time. Ind Mark Manag 41(8):1186–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD and Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, The measurement of scientific and technological activities, 3rd edn. OECD Publishing, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J Oper Manag 23(3–4):371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strateg Manag J 23(8):707–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Skinner SJ (1989) Interorganizational dependence and control as predictors of opportunism in dealer-supplier relations. Acad Manag J 32(1):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Scannell TV (1997) Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 14(3):190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2007) Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strateg Manag J 28(3):313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuer JJ, Zollo M, Singh H (2002) Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strateg Manag J 23(2):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, van de Ven AH (1992) Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strateg Manag J 13(7):483–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring PS, van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad Manag Rev 19(1):90–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Säfsten K, Johansson G, Lakemond N, Magnusson T (2014) Interface challenges and managerial issues in the industrial innovation process. J Manuf Technol Manag 25(2):218–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiele H (2012) Accessing supplier innovation by being their preferred customer. Res Technol Manag 55(1):44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluyts K, Matthyssens P, Martens R, Streukens S (2011) Building capabilities to manage strategic alliances. Ind Mark Manag 40(6):875–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2002) Screening for drug discovery: the leading question. Nature 418(6896):453–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrero M, Roberts EB (2002) Strategic management of supplier–manufacturer relations in new product development. Res Policy 31(1):159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko MA, Calantone RJ (2011) Controversy in innovation outsourcing research: review, synthesis and future directions. R&D Manag 41(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas E (2013) Supplier integration in new product development: computer mediated communication, knowledge exchange and buyer performance. Ind Mark Manag 42(6):890–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk W, Sumo R, Dul J, Schroeder RG (2016) When are contracts and trust necessary for innovation in buyer-supplier relationships? A necessary condition analysis. J Purch Supply Manag 22(4):266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke W, Du J, Leten B, Aalders F (2014) Exploring open innovation at the level of R&D projects. In: New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • West J, Bogers M (2014) Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31(4):814–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Organizing and leading “heavyweight” development teams. Calif Manag Rev 34(3):9–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) The limits of organization. J Bus 48(3):452–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of the firm innov’& is gratefully acknowledged for the realization of this study. We also appreciate the support of Jan Dul for helping us apply the NCA method to our data, and the support of Thibaud Guedon and Georges-Edouard Sarkis, students of Ecole polytechnique, in this process. First versions of this work were presented at the EURAM and IPSERA annual conferences in 2016 and 2017 respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romaric Servajean-Hilst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Servajean-Hilst, R. (2018). Necessary Governing Practices for the Success (and Failure) of Client-Supplier Innovation Cooperation. In: Moreira, A., Ferreira, L., Zimmermann, R. (eds) Innovation and Supply Chain Management. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74304-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics