Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legislative History, Ratio Legis, and the Concept of the Rational Legislator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ratio Legis

Abstract

In Polish legal theory, the concept of the rational legislator—an ideal type of lawmaker that fulfills certain assumptions regarding its knowledge and values—plays a profound role in the process of legal interpretation. In this context, the concept of the rational lawmaker is best understood as a set of methodological directives that govern the process of legal analysis. These rules enable the translation of ambiguous and often inconsistent texts of legal statutes into a coherent system of unequivocal legal norms.

Yet if the concept of the rational legislator is accepted as the basis of legal interpretation, the ratio legis of a statute must be determined using sources that can be conventionally attributed to the rational lawmaker. These include the text of the statute in question, its preamble, and the values that can be decoded from other legal texts, primarily from the constitution.

Nevertheless, as an ontological gap exists between the rational lawmaker and actual legislators, the use of legislative history in the process of the analysis of ratio legis is somewhat questionable. Aside from providing methodological background for the concepts of humanistic interpretation and the rational legislator, this article explores the difficulties involved in applying legislative history to the abovementioned paradigm of legal interpretation and aims to assess how, if at all, this can be reconciled with the idea of the rational lawmaker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bielska-Brodziak A (2012) Materiały legislacyjne w dyskursie interpretacyjnym z perspektywy brytyjskiej, amerykańskiej, francuskiej, szwedzkiej i polskiej [Legislative history in the interpretative discourse from British, American, French, Swedish and Polish perspective]. In: Nawrot O, Sykuna S, Zajadło J (eds) Konwergencja czy dywergencja kultur i systemów prawnych? [Convergence or divergence of cultures and legal systems?]. C.H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 144–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielska-Brodziak A (2015) Argumenty interpretacyjne w kontekście wartości państwa prawa [Interpretative arguments in the context of the values of a state ruled by law]. In: Andruszkiewicz M, Breczko A, Oliwiniak S (eds) Filozoficzne i teoretyczne zagadnienia demokratycznego państwa prawa [Philosophical and theoretical questions of a democratic state ruled by law]. Temida 2, Białystok, pp 183–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogucki O (2016) Model wykładni funkcjonalnej w derywacyjnej koncepcji wykładni prawa [Model of functional interpretation in derivative theory of legal interpretation]. Polgres Multimedia, Szczecin

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowicz A (2009) Argument interpretacyjny odwołujący się do woli rzeczywistego prawodawcy [Interpretative argument based on the intentions of the lawgiver]. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne 79:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer S (1992) On the uses of legislative history in interpreting statutes. South Calif Law Rev 65:845–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzeziński B (2006) Współczesne amerykańskie teorie wykładni prawa [Contemporary American theories of law interpretation]. Państwo i Prawo 7:22–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Choduń A (2015) Maciej Zieliński’s (derivative) concept of legal interpretation. Studia Prawa Publicznego 2(10):111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis B, Kelly K, Ford K (2007) Use of legislative history: willow witching for legislative intent. Idaho Law Rev 43:585–600

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ville JR (1999) Legislative history and constitutional interpretation. J S Afr Law 2:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmita J (1971) Z metodologicznych problemów interpretacji humanistycznej [On the methodological problems of humanistic interpretation]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmita J (1990) Etyczny aspekt koncepcji racjonalnego prawodawcy [The ethical dimension of the concept of the rational legislator]. In: Wronkowska S, Zieliński M (eds) Szkice z teorii prawa i szczegółowych nauk prawnych [Sketches on legal theory and particular legal sciences]. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań, pp 413–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmita J, Nowak L (1968) Studia nad teoretycznymi podstawami humanistyki [Studies on the theoretical foundations of the humanities]. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmita J, Nowak L (1970) The rationality assumption in human sciences. The Polish. Sociol Bull 1:43–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak L (1973) Interpretacja prawnicza. Studium z metodologii prawoznawstwa [Legal interpretation. A study in the methodology of jurisprudence]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak L (1987) A concept of rational legislator. In: Ziembiński Z (ed) Polish contributions to the theory and philosophy of law. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak L (1992) The idealizational approach to science: a survey. In: Brzeziński J, Nowak L (eds) Idealization III: approximation and truth. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 9–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Patryas W (1979) Idealizacyjny charakter interpretacji humanistycznej [Idealizational character of humanistic interpretation]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrzeszcz J (2016) Racjonalność aksjologiczna prawodawcy jako założenie interpretacyjne [The axiological rationality of the lawmaker as an interpretative assumption]. In: Hermann M, Sykuna S (eds) Wykładnia prawa. Tradycja i perspektywy [Legal interpretation. Tradition and prospects]. C.H. Beck, Warszawa, pp 53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz J (1996) Intention in interpretation. In: George R (ed) The autonomy of law. Essays on legal positivism. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 249–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalia A (1998) A matter of interpretation: federal courts and the law. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (2010) Codified canons and the common law of interpretation. Georgetown Law J 98:341–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolak M (2012) Wykładnia celowościowa z perspektywy pragmatycznej [Purposive interpretation from pragmatic point of view]. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr K (1987) Observations about the use of legislative history. Duke Law J:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobor Z (2013) W poszukiwaniu intencji prawodawcy [The search for legislative intent]. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobor Z (2016) Rola materiałów legislacyjnych w porządku prawnym [The role of legislative history in legal order]. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, Przegląd Prawa i Administracji 104:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisner M (2013) Other uses of legislative history. Law Libr J 105(2):243–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Wróblewski J (1959) Zagadnienia teorii wykładni praw ludowego [Problems of the theory of interpretation of people’s law]. Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Wronkowska S (1987) The rational legislator as a model for the real lawmaker. In: Ziembiński Z (ed) Polish contributions to the theory and philosophy of law. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieliński M (1972) Interpretacja jako proces dekodowania tekstu prawnego [Interpretation as a process of decoding of legal text]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieliński M (1987) Decoding legal text. In: Ziembiński Z (ed) Polish contributions to the theory and philosophy of law. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieliński M (2017) Wykładnia prawa. Zasady, reguły, wskazówki [Legal interpretation. Principles, rules, hints], 7th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziembiński Z (1960) Przepis prawny a norma prawna [Legal provision and legal norm]. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny 1:105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziembiński Z (1980) Problemy podstawowe prawoznawstwa [The basic problems of jurisprudence]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Costelloe S (2015) The need for conditions limiting the use of legislative history in statutory interpretation: lessons from the British courts. Notre Dame J Law Ethics & Pub Pol’y 29:299–327

    Google Scholar 

Court Rulings

    Poland

    • Supreme Court Resolution of 17 January 2001 (III CZP 49/00).

      Google Scholar 

    • Supreme Court Resolution of 29 September 2004 (I KZP 20/04).

      Google Scholar 

    • Supreme Court Resolution of 16 November 2004 (III SPP 42/04).

      Google Scholar 

    • Constitutional Court Verdict of 15 October 2008 (P 32/06).

      Google Scholar 

    • Constitutional Court Verdict of 7 April 2009 (P 7/08).

      Google Scholar 

    • Supreme Court Decision of 23 September 2009 (I KZP 18/09).

      Google Scholar 

    • Supreme Court Resolution of 17 November 2009 (III CZP 89/09).

      Google Scholar 

    • Supreme Court Verdict of 10 November 2010 (III UK 5/10).

      Google Scholar 

    • Warsaw Appellate Court Verdict of 16 June 2015 (VI ACa 1057/14).

      Google Scholar 

    • Gdańsk Appellate Court Verdict of 6 July 2016 (III AUa 396/16).

      Google Scholar 

    • Cracow District Administrative Court Verdict of 20 April 2017 (III SA/Kr 185/17).

      Google Scholar 

    South Africa

    • Minister of Land Affairs of the Republic of South Africa and Another v Slamdien and Others, South Africa Land Claims Court Verdict of 10 February 1999 (LCC107/98)

      Google Scholar 

    United Kingdom

    • Pepper v. Hart, House of Lords Decision of 26 November 1992 (UKHL 3)

      Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration, Poznań, Poland

      Michał Krotoszyński

    Authors
    1. Michał Krotoszyński
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Michał Krotoszyński .

    Editor information

    Editors and Affiliations

    1. Faculty of Law, Department for German and European Private Law, Civil Procedural Law, and Legal Theory of Prof. Dr. Thomas Riehm, University of Passau, Passau, Germany

      Verena Klappstein

    2. Department of Legal Theory and Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poznań, Poland

      Maciej Dybowski

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

    About this chapter

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this chapter

    Krotoszyński, M. (2018). Legislative History, Ratio Legis, and the Concept of the Rational Legislator. In: Klappstein, V., Dybowski, M. (eds) Ratio Legis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74271-7_4

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74271-7_4

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

    • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74270-0

    • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74271-7

    • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation