Skip to main content

The Aesthetic Pursuit of Educational Leadership for Social Justice: Grace in the Struggle

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

Attention to aesthetics in educational leadership literature and organizational leadership has increased over the last two decades. However, this attention has seldom included grace. We highlight emerging contemplations of grace to bring attention to conceptions of injustice and justice (i.e., transitional justice, global justice) through micro and macro-lenses (i.e., affective economy). This pairing of ethics and aesthetics provides an entry point for developing ways of being and doing educational leadership to enter the struggles against social injustices in and beyond schools and school districts. We first trace grace as a philosophical construct of European discourse up to the eighteenth century, including how it has become more broadly conceived as physical movement and within political movements and how some conceptions of it can undermine leadership intending to advance (social) justice. We then illustrate shifts away from conceptions of grace as a singularly intellectual or physical process to conceptions of grace as an affective and ethical process. These shifts are exemplified in historical and contemporary events including the Black Art Movements, Indigenous perspectives, and public mourning over the loss of children or grandchildren. Given the increasing examples of hostilities in schools that include mass shootings and confrontations between students and staff over politically and racially charged discourse, those preparing to engage in educational leadership are challenged to enter the field poised to “act ugly” in confrontation with monsters, monstrosities, atrocities, and their own Shadow-Beast. This chapter aims to encourage educational leadership, as a field of performances, to perceive and practice grace informed by conceptions of it that support struggles for social justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M. H. (1953). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. (1997). Aesthetic theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosto. (2018). Molding curriculum leadership theory. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision, 36(4), 6–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosto, V., & Roland, E. (2018). Intersectionality and educational leadership: A critical review. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 255–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands: La Frontera. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, M. (2003). Ugliness. In R. S. Nelson & R. Schiff (Eds.), Critical terms for art history (2nd ed., pp. 281–295). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, N. (2018). Ugliness. In S. Rodrigues & E. Przybylo (Eds.), On the politics of ugliness (pp. 31–49). Cham, CH: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, J. (2004). Conduct book. In R. Clark & J. Todd (Eds.), Literary encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://www.literarydictionary.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. (1963). A talk to teachers. In W. C. Johnson (Ed.), Child development and learning (pp. 7–12). New York, NY: MSS Information Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (1996). How is it, then, that we still remain barbarians? Foucault, Schiller, and the aestheticization of ethics. Political theory, 24(4), 653–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. L. (1979). The meaning of “grace” in Pope’s aesthetic. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 94(3), 434–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brissenden, R. F. (1974). Virtue in distress: Studies in the novel of sentiment from Richardson to Sade. London, England: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgdorf, M. P., & Burgdorf, R., Jr. (1974). A history of unequal treatment: The qualifications of handicapped persons as a suspect class under the equal protection clause. Santa Clara Lawyer, 15(4), 855–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmodernism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, E. A. (2007). Transitional justice and the reform of history education. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(1), 115–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. J. (1892). A voice from the South. Xenia, OH: The Aldine Printing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csengei, I. (2011). Sympathy, sensibility, and the literature of feeling in the eighteenth century. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, L., Addica, M., Rokos, W., Forster, M., Thornton, B. B., Ledger, H., Berry, H., Diddy, Mos, D., Calhoun, C., Boyle, P., Schaefer. R., Cheesé, M., Fleming, F., & Monroe, K. (2002). Lions Gate Home Entertainment. Monster’s ball.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deligiorgi, K. (2006). Grace as a guide to morals? Schiller’s aesthetic turn in ethics. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 23(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2000). Aesthetics and the practices of qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L. (1986). The aesthetics of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1990). The ideology of the aesthetic. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, L. C., & English, F. W. (2012). Leadership as dance: A consideration of the applicability of the ‘mother’ of all arts as the basis for establishing connoisseurship. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(4), 454–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2007). Anatomy of professional practice: Promising research perspectives on educational leadership. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, R. (1952). Invisible man. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandsman, A. E. (2012). Retributive justice, public intimacies and the micropolitics of the restitution of kidnapped children of the disappeared in Argentina. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6(3), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudelli, W., & Hewitt, R. (2010). The aesthetic potential of global issues curriculum. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 44(2), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. (2018). Layers of rotting wood: A meditation on the curricular value of the ugly. Cogent Education, 5, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernized universities: Epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 11(1), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H., Ropo, A., & Sauer, E. (2007). Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, S. (2017). An (in) visible universe of grief: Performative disidentifications with white motherhood in the ‘we are not Trayvon Martin’ blog. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 10(1), 62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohr, H. (2002). Does beauty matter in education? Friedrich Schiller’s neohumanistic approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsford, S. D., Scott, J. T., & Anderson, G. L. (2018). The politics of education policy in an era of inequality: Possibilities for democratic schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (2013). Oppression, privilege, & aesthetics: The use of the aesthetic in theories of race, gender, and sexuality, and the role of race, gender, and sexuality in philosophical aesthetics. Philosophy Compass, 8(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1992). Force fields. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenlink, P. M. (2006). Aesthetics in education: Definitions and issues. In F. W. English (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration (pp. 32–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412939584

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. (2014). Culturally responsive leadership for community empowerment. Multicultural Education Review, 6(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krečic, J., & Žižek, S. (2016). Ugly, creepy, disgusting, and other modes of abjection. Critical Inquiry, 43, 60–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumashiro, K. K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oppressive education. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lashway, L. (2006). Ethical leadership. In S. C. Smith & P. K. Piele (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence in student learning (pp. 130–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, A. E. (2015). Navigating cultural borders in diverse contexts: Building capacity through culturally responsive leadership and critical praxis. Multicultural Education Review, 7(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, H. J. (2018a). Conceptualizing indigeneity and gender in educational leadership inquiry: Applying a framework for systemic critique to problems of practice. In E. T. Murakami & H. J. Mackey (Eds.), Beyond marginality: Understanding the Intersection of race, ethnicity, gender and difference in educational leadership research (pp. 53–61). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, H. J. (2018b). Contemporary decononloziation [sic]: Dismantling policy barriers to systemic equity and self-determination. In R. Papa & S. W. J. Armfield (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of educational policy (pp. 267–287). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Male, J. (2005, October). Wheels welcome. Dance Magazine, pp. 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, S. H. (1944). A “grace beyond the reach of art”. Journal of the History of Ideas, 5(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of color and the performance of politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2003). Reculturing educational leadership: The ISLLC standards ten years out. Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, L. (1968). The black arts movement. The Drama Review, 12(4), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, S. (2005). Ugly feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T. G., Wenzel, M., & Feather, N. T. (2009). Beyond retribution: Conceptualizing restorative justice and exploring its determinants. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips-Fein, J. (2007). Dance and activism. In G. Anderson & K. G. Herr (Eds.), Encyclopedia of activism and social justice (pp. 419–421). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, A. J. (2014). Toward an aesthetics of race: Bridging the writings of Gloria Anzaldúa and José Vasconcelos. Inter-American Journal of Philosophy, 5(1), 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, A. (1711/1903). Essay on criticism. London, England: JM Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2007). The emancipated spectator. Artforum International, 45(7), 270–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rishol, K. C., & Tingley, S. (1995). Lessons in grace. Executive Educator, 17(4), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santana, C. (2017). Monstrous anthropology: The appearance of colonisation. Third Text, 31(4), 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, K. (1983/2015). Aesthetik des Hässlichen/Aesthetics of the ugly (D. Kliche, Ed.). Leipzig, Germany: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, K. (1996). Ästhetik des Häβlichen (1853). Reclam: Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samier, E. A., & Bates, R. (Eds.). (2006). The aesthetic dimensions of educational administration & leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. (1793/2005). On grace and dignity (J. V. Curran, Trans.). In J. V. Curran & C. Fricker (Eds.), Schiller’s ‘on grace and dignity’ in its cultural context: Essays and a new translation (pp. 123–170). Rochester, NY: Camden House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. (1795/1967). On the aesthetic education of man (E. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby, Ed. and Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweik, S. M. (2009). The ugly laws: Disability in public. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B. (1994). The ragged edge: The disability experience from the pages of the first fifteen years of the disability rag. Louisville, KY: Avocado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strati, A. (2000). Aesthetic theory. In S. Linstead & H. Höpfl (Eds.), The aesthetics of organization (pp. 13–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. G. (2003). Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G. P. (1973) Affective economy (Paper 2765). Master’s theses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy, 23(1), 102–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vonzell Agosto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Agosto, V., Westberry, G. (2020). The Aesthetic Pursuit of Educational Leadership for Social Justice: Grace in the Struggle. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_126-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_126-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics