Skip to main content

Marketing Insects: Superfood or Solution-Food?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

In entering Western markets, edible insects are typically framed as the ‘solution’ to a number of challenges caused by unsustainable global food systems, such as climate change and global health issues. In addition, some media outlets also frame insects as the next ‘superfood’. Superfood is a marketing term for nutrient-packed foods, which are successfully promoted to Western consumers with the promises of health, well-being and beauty. However, the increase in the demand in the West is argued to cause negative social, environmental, economic and cultural consequences – externalities – felt by those who traditionally produce and consume the foods. These actors are located far away from where the superfood phenomenon materializes. Therefore, we detect a possibly contentious framing strategy through double-framing insects as both a solution and a superfood. We ask: how can insects be promoted as the solution to the negative externalities that arise from unsustainable Western consumption patterns, while at the same time being framed as a ‘superfood’, which cause those very externalities? As a point of departure for this chapter, we build on the research article Entomophagy and Power by Müller et al. (J Insect Food Feed 2(2):121–136, 2016), who raise a concern that the growth of Western insect industries might reproduce, rather than challenge, power imbalances in global food systems. Our analysis suggests that the tensions of double-framing insects as both ‘solution’ and ‘superfood’ might be the first step of pushing insects towards an unsustainable future, particularly because of two pitfalls common for superfoods: firstly, the homogenization of diverse practice, and secondly, universalized sustainability and apolotical solutions. However, our study finds also that insects differ from superfoods for two main reasons: for insects’ ability to add value locally and because of the involvement of sustainably-driven actors from the beginning of industry formation. Due to these differences, this study concludes that if the superfood pitfalls are avoided, insects have a potential to become a truly ‘sustainable superfood’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See trend development for acai, quinoa, avocado and edible insects from 2004–2016 here: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=Acai,Avocado,Quinoa,edible%20insect*.

  2. 2.

    The guiding research questions for studying superfoods are the following: What is the traditional state of the food item in question? How does the food item enter the West? Who begins to frame the food item in question as a superfood? What qualities is the food item promoted for? Which externalities does a food item’s superfood status cause for its traditional consumers and producer communities? Who are the key actors in the process of ‘superfoodization’, whose voice is being heard, who is being excluded from the conversation, and who is driving the change? What rules, norms, incentives and values guide behaviour? What tensions arise along the process of ‘superfoodization’?

  3. 3.

    To ensure comparability to the superfood media studies, the research questions for studying edible insects are the same as for superfoods.

  4. 4.

    For more insight into the terms and themes identified by Müller et al. (2016) used for analyzing marketing claims for edible insects, see www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/suppl/10.3920/JIFF2016.0010/suppl_file/jiff2016.0010_esm_s5_categories+and+codes+used+in+analysis.pdf.

  5. 5.

    For a full analysis, see Kaukua and Schiemer (2017).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Schiemer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiemer, C., Halloran, A., Jespersen, K., Kaukua, P. (2018). Marketing Insects: Superfood or Solution-Food?. In: Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N. (eds) Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74011-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics