Skip to main content

Introduction: From Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Business Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Models

Abstract

The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR), defined here as coordinated business actions aimed at a more sustainable world, has always been fairly controversial, both from the perspective of academic discourse and from the perspective of corporate practice. In its most basic terms, questions have been asked about whether corporations can and should actually have social responsibilities and, if so, to what extent? (cf. Davis 1973; Moon et al. 2005). Reflecting on the social responsibilities of business, a scholarly debate has developed that has given rise to a multitude of conceptions on the roles and responsibilities of business in society. These conceptions roughly vary from Friedman’s position that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (Friedman 1970) to positions about CSR that reflect the principle of sustainable development as formulated in the well-known “Brundtland report” as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED 1987: 204) and that now extend to and is operationalized through the Sustainable Development Goals. While different positions on the responsibilities of business in society remain to be held, partly motivated by political beliefs and worldviews, the question “what is a business for?” is nowadays answered in a way that aligns with a broader conception including taking into account the interests of and being accountable to a broader set of stakeholders than merely those with a financial or otherwise economic concern as well as society as a whole, nature and future generations. A survey among consumers from 10 of the world’s largest countries showed that some 81% thought that firms have responsibilities going (far) beyond creating shareholder value, with 31% thinking that firms should change the way they operate to align with greater social and environmental needs (Cone Communications/Echo 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the comprehensive literature review of Zott et al. (2011) for on overview of definitions.

References

  • Al-Debei, M., & Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2010a). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2010b). Business model innovation: Creating value in times of change. Working paper WP-870. Barcelona: IESE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 464–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P. (2007). The evolution of corporate responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6), 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone Communications/Echo. (2013). 2013 Global CSR study. Boston: Cone Communications/Echo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, D. (2005). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Minnows, mammoths and markets. Futures, 37(2/3), 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman. (2017). 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. New York: Edelman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globescan. (2012). Credibility gap persists around companies’ CSR communications. Featured findings. Accessed at: http://www.globescan.com/commentary-and-analysis/featured-findings/entry/credibility-gap-persists-around-companies-csr-communications.html

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2009). Business model concepts in corporate sustainability contexts: From rhetoric to a generic template for ‘business models for sustainability’. Working paper, Center for Sustainability Management, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys, T., Naughton, J., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, F. (2016). 4th Generation sustainable business models. NHTV: Breda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2006). Environment and modernity in transitional China: Frontiers of ecological modernization. Development and Change, 37(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L. (2014). The perversity of business case approaches to CSR: Nuancing and extending the critique of Nijhof & Jeurissen. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(9/10), 654–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L. (2015). Standardizing a better world? Essays and critical reflections on the ISO 26000 standard for corporate social responsibility. Heerlen: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2010). The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility: Consequences of a business case approach to CSR. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(2), 618–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challenges. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a new wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Going one’s own way: Drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a ‘sustainable business model’. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SustainAbility. (2014). Model behavior: 20 business model innovations for sustainability. London: SustainAbility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terlaak, A. (2007). Order without law: The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired form behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 968–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. Report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (2013). Business models for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, F. (2010). For better or for worse: Corporate responsibility beyond ‘do no harm’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (2016). Living planet report 2016: Risk and resilience in a new era. Gland: WWF International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Moratis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S.O. (2018). Introduction: From Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Business Models. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics