Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Statistics ((BRIEFSSTATIST))

  • 1726 Accesses

Abstract

The data for MDS, proximities, are discussed. Proximities can be collected directly as judgments of similarity; proximities can be derived from data vectors; proximities may result from converting other indexes; and co-occurrence data are yet another popular form of proximities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For other forms of standardization, the results are essentially the same. For example, when turning the variables first into z-scores (with mean zero and \(sd=1\)), Eq. (4.1) changes to \(const= \sqrt{2N}\). Note, however, that when you compute a product-moment correlation, you implicitly standardize your variables. If that makes sense, you should also standardize them before computing distances, but then using correlations or distances does not make a difference in ordinal MDS.

  2. 2.

    An R-function, dist.binary(), for computing ten different S-coefficients—including \(S_2\), \(S_3\), and \(S_4\) – among the columns of a binary data matrix can be found at https://rdrr.io/rforge/ade4/src/R/dist.binary.R.

  3. 3.

    If you have many cases of no co-occurrence, then your dissimilarity matrix becomes very sparse. Then, of course, MDS may become rather arbitrary, producing fancy configurations based on almost no data.

References

  • Bilsky, W., Borg, I., & Wetzels, P. (1994). Assessing connfict tactics in close relationships: A reanlysis of a research instrument. In J. J. Hox, P. G. Swanborn, & G. J. Mellenbergh (Eds.), Facet theory: Analysis and design (pp. 39–46). Zeist, The Netherlands: Setos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I. (1988). Revisiting Thurstone’s and Coombs’ scales on the seriousness of crimes and offences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. F. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. F., & Cox, M. A. A. (2000). Multidimensional scaling (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, A. P. M., & Jones, C. L. (1978). The images of occupational prestige: A study in social cognition. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • England, G., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. (1994). How working is defined: Structure and stability. In I. Borg & S. Dolan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Work and Organizational Values (pp. 104–113). Montreal: ISSWOV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. (1975). Pattern goodness and redundancy revisited: Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering analyses. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 158–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. (1985). Measures of similarity, dissimilarity, and distance. In S. Kotz, N. L. Johnson, & C. B. Read (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 397–405). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graef, J., & Spence, I. (1979). Using distance information in the design of large multidimensional scaling experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., & Wind, Y. (1973). Multivariate decisions in marketing: A measurement approach. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P., Rusch, T., & Hornik, K. (2014). The grand old party: A party of values? SpringerPlus, 3(697), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle, F. (1959). A metric and an ordering on sets. Psychometrika, 24, 207–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, I., & Domoney, D. W. (1974). Single subject incomplete designs for nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 39, 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W., & Wineburg, S. (1971). A cappadocian speculation. Nature, 231, 39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingwer Borg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borg, I., Groenen, P.J.F., Mair, P. (2018). Proximities. In: Applied Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding. SpringerBriefs in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73471-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics