Skip to main content

Learning Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performing Arts as High-Impact Practice

Part of the book series: The Arts in Higher Education ((AHE))

  • 517 Accesses

Abstract

The goals of learning communities—extensive student–faculty interaction, collaboration with peers, and active learning—are often achieved through the embodied learning that is a part of performing arts courses, and learning communities offer performing arts faculty a fertile territory for developing somatic pedagogies. Brian LaDuca’s case study looks at the University of Dayton’s Institute of Applied Creativity for Transformation’s (IACT) transdisciplinary humanity-centered educational framework where students discover potential solutions and ideas for life’s big questions. Blake Stevens and Bill Manaris discuss their First-Year learning community at the College of Charleston, which combines introductory training in music and applied knowledge of music theory and practice to the creation of musical transcriptions of pre-existing works, beginning compositional exercises, and laptop orchestra performance through computer coding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Defining Features,” The National Resource Center for Learning Communities.

  2. 2.

    For some representative studies and summaries of research on Learning Communities, see Anne Goodsell Love, “The Growth and Current State of Learning Communities in Higher Education”; Tiffany Cambridge-Williams, Adam Winsler, Anastasia Kitsantas, and Elizabeth Bernard, “University 100 Orientation Courses and Living-Learning Communities Boost Academic Retention and Graduation via Enhanced Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning”; Gene Popiolek, Ricka Fine, and Valerie Eilman, “Learning Communities, Academic Performance, Attrition, and Retention: A Four-Year Study.”

  3. 3.

    Emily Lardner and Gillies Malnarich, “A New Era in Learning-Community Work: Why the Pedagogy of Intentional Integration Matters.”

  4. 4.

    Some research on the positive impact of learning communities on various aspects of student learning and acclimation to college can be found in the NSSE publication “Experiences That Matter: Enhancing Student Learning and Success, Annual Report 2007.”

  5. 5.

    Emily Lardner, “What Campuses Assess When They Assess Their Learning Community Programs: Selected Findings from a National Survey of Learning Community Programs,” 6. For the various types of student engagement as measured by the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), see “NSSE/Engagement Indicators.”

  6. 6.

    Gary R. Pike, George D. Kuh, and Alexander C. McCormick, “An Investigation of the Contingent Relationships between Learning Community Participation and Student Engagement,” 314.

  7. 7.

    Patricia G. Sandoval and Jack J. Mino, “The Play’s the Thing: Embodying Moments of Integration Live, on Stage,” 1.

  8. 8.

    Robyn Tudor, “The Pedagogy of Creativity: Understanding Higher Order Capability Development in Design and Arts Education.”

  9. 9.

    See Iannis Xenakis, Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics in Composition.

  10. 10.

    See Bamberger, Jeanne Shapiro, The Development of Musical Intelligence I: Strategies for Representing Simple Rhythms; Andrew R. Brown and Steve C. Dillon, “Networked Improvisational Musical Environments: Learning through online collaborative music making”; Bill Manaris and Andrew R. Brown, Making Music with Computers: Creative Programming in Python.

  11. 11.

    Funding for this work was provided in part by the National Science Foundation (DUE-1044861).

  12. 12.

    David Williamson Shaffer and Mitchel Resnick, “‘Thick’ Authenticity: New Media and Authentic Learning”; Felipe Otondo, “Using spatial sound as an interdisciplinary teaching tool.”

  13. 13.

    George D. Kuh and Carol Geary Schneider, High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter.

  14. 14.

    Bill Manaris, Juan Romero, Penousal Machado, Dwight Krehbiel, Timothy Hirzel, Walter Pharr, and Robert B. Davis, “Zipf’s Law, Music Classification, and Aesthetics.”

  15. 15.

    Melissa E. O’Neill, “Automated Use of a Wiki for Collaborative Lecture Notes.”

  16. 16.

    JythonMusic is an environment for music making and creative activities based on the programming language Python (see http://jythonmusic.org).

  17. 17.

    Louis Niebur, “‘Switched-On Bach’–Wendy Carlos (1968).”

  18. 18.

    Daniel Trueman, Perry Cook, Scott Smallwood, and Ge Wang, “PLOrk: The Princeton Laptop Orchestra, Year 1”; Daniel Trueman, “Why a laptop orchestra?”

  19. 19.

    Tom Mudd, “Developing transferable skills through engagement with higher education laptop ensembles.”

  20. 20.

    Andrew Sorensen, “The Many Faces of a Temporal Recursion.”

  21. 21.

    Peter Vergo, The Music of Painting: Music, Modernism and the Visual Arts from the Romantics to John Cage.

  22. 22.

    Nandini McCauley, “Computing in the Arts Exhibition: Visual Soundscapes.”

  23. 23.

    Bill Manaris, Blake Stevens, and Andrew R. Brown, “JythonMusic: An environment for teaching algorithmic music composition, dynamic coding and musical performativity.”

  24. 24.

    Again, see Manaris et al. “JythonMusic: An environment for teaching algorithmic music composition, dynamic coding and musical performativity,” for the specific questions asked.

  25. 25.

    See Manaris et al. “JythonMusic: An environment for teaching algorithmic music composition, dynamic coding and musical performativity,” 49–51.

  26. 26.

    For example, see Brown and Dillon, “Networked Improvisational Musical Environments”; Tom Mudd, “Developing transferable skills through engagement with higher education laptop ensembles”; Shaffer and Resnick, “‘Thick’ Authenticity”; Trueman “Why a laptop orchestra?”; Trueman et al. “PLOrk”; Ge Wang and Perry Cook. “ChucK: A Concurrent, On-the-fly, Audio Programming Language.”

  27. 27.

    E.J. West, Shaw on Theatre, 59.

  28. 28.

    Raymond Williams, Drama from Ibsen to Brecht, 37.

  29. 29.

    Victor Turner, On the Edge of the Bush: Anthropology as Experience, 196–197.

  30. 30.

    Stephen Stanton, Camille and Other Plays, xiv–xv.

  31. 31.

    Elizabeth Bell, “Social Dramas and Cultural Performances: All the President’s Women.”

  32. 32.

    Dan P. McAdams, “Personal Narrative and the Life Story,” 242–243.

  33. 33.

    Tacy Trowbridge, “Closing the Skills Gap: Why Creativity is Essential to Students’ Workplace Success.”

  34. 34.

    Fernando Lozano and Amanda Sabicer, “Creativity and Innovation: Building Ecosystems to Support Risk Taking, Resiliency, and Collaboration.”

  35. 35.

    Ideo.org .

  36. 36.

    “The Catholic and Marianist Philosophy of Community Living at the University of Dayton.”

  37. 37.

    Maggie Fiegl, “FEAR Makes its Way into ArtStreet’s IAN Installation Series.”

  38. 38.

    Julie Turkewitz, “Oregon Gunman Smiled, Then Fired, Student Says.”

  39. 39.

    Grant Wiggins, “On Assessing for Creativity: Yes You Can, and Yes You Should.”

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hayford, M., Kattwinkel, S. (2018). Learning Communities. In: Hayford, M., Kattwinkel, S. (eds) Performing Arts as High-Impact Practice. The Arts in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72944-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72944-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72943-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72944-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics