Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of philosophy of education as positioned in between the discourses and concerns of philosophy, on the one hand, and education, on the other. Maintaining credibility with both domains presents philosophy of education with certain dilemmas, which this chapter tries to address. Three ways of minimizing these dilemmas are explored: the development of non-ideal theories, philosophy of education as a situated practice, and the use of case-based methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 669.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Michael A Peters, Nicholas C. Burbules, and Paul Smeyers, Showing and Doing: Wittgenstein as a Pedagogical Philosopher (Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishing, 2008). Revised and reissued with a new Preface and Postscript (2010).

  2. 2.

    Another example, concerning education in John Locke’s theory, is Nazar, Hina. “Locke, Education, and ‘Disciplinary Liberalism’.” The Review of Politics 79, no. 2 (2017): 215–238.

  3. 3.

    This account is partly inspired by Jim Giarelli’s distinction of philosophy of education, philosophy and education, and philosophy as education, though I frame the issues slightly differently than he did. James Giarelli, “Philosophy, Education, and Public Practice,” in Philosophy of Education 1990, ed. David Ericson (Normal, Ill.: Philosophy of Education Society, 1991).

  4. 4.

    Nicholas C. Burbules, “Continuity and diversity in philosophy of education: An introduction.” Educational Theory, Vol. 41 No. 3 (1991): 257–263.

  5. 5.

    This section is excerpted and adapted from Nicholas C. Burbules, “Non-ideal theory and the philosophy of education,” Philosophical Studies in Education Vol. 46 (2015): 25–35.

  6. 6.

    This section is excerpted and adapted from Nicholas C. Burbules and Kathleen Knight Abowitz, “A situated philosophy of education.” Philosophy of Education Society Yearbook, 2008, Ron Glass, ed. (Urbana, Illinois: Philosophy of Education Society, 2009), pp. 268–276.

  7. 7.

    Albert R. Jonsen and Stephen Toulmin. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Univ of California Press, 1988.

  8. 8.

    Meira Levinson and Jacob Fay. Dilemmas of Educational Ethics: Cases and Commentaries. Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, 2016: pp. 3–4.

  9. 9.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem [Accessed January 17, 2017].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas C. Burbules .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burbules, N.C. (2018). Philosophy of Education. In: Smeyers, P. (eds) International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_98

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_98

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72759-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72761-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics