Skip to main content

Ductile Fracture Assessment of 304L Stainless Steel Using 3D X-ray Computed Tomography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
TMS 2018 147th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings (TMS 2018)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Stainless steel manufactured by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) has been shown to exhibit significant differences in ductile fracture behavior when compared to equivalently graded forged steel, due to differences in oxide particle concentration between the two manufacture routes. Herein we analyse and quantify the ductile damage characteristics in the fracture process zone of equivalently graded forged and HIP 304L steel using 3D X-ray computed tomography (CT). Ductile void characteristics have been found to vary in size, shape, and spatial distribution; data which are in agreement with the differences in distribution of initiation particles in HIP and forged steel. Using advanced X-ray CT to characterize ductile damage, experimentally determined data can be employed to calibrate existing well-known ductile failure models, developing both our current understanding of ductile failure as well as a predictive tool to simulate fracture in novel HIP components.

The original version of this chapter was revised: Chapter author name has been updated. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72526-0_91

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rao GA, Kumar M (1997) High performance stainless steel via powder metallurgy hot isostatic pressing. Mater Sci Technol 13:1027–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barre C (1999) Hot isostatic pressing. Adv Mater Process 155:47–48

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeon YC, Kim KT (1999) Near-net-shape forming of 316L stainless steel powder under hot isostatic pressing. Int J Mech Sci 41:815–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson HV, Davies S (2000) Fundamental aspects of hot isostatic pressing: an overview. Metall Mater Trans A 31:2981–3000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnberg L, Karlsson A (1988) Influence of powder surface oxidation on some properties of a hiped martensitic chromium steel. Int J Powder Met 24:107–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomason PF (1990) Ductile fracture of metals. Pergamon Press

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson TL, Anderson T (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sato Y, Maie T, Kuwana T (1995) Influence of oxygen on the impact toughness and microstructure of steel weld metal. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering—OMAE 1995, pp 485–490

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper AJ, Smith RJ, Sherry AH (2017) An assessment of the ductile fracture behavior of hot isostatically pressed and forged 304L stainless steel. Metall Mat Trans A 48:2207–2221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper AJ, Cooper NI, Bell A, Dhers J, Sherry AH (2015) A microstructural study on the observed differences in charpy impact behavior between hot isostatically pressed and forged 304L and 316L Austenitic stainless steel. Met Mat Trans A 46:5126–5138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper AJ, Cooper NI, Dhers J, Sherry AH (2016) Effect of Oxygen content upon the microstructural and mechanical properties of type 316L Austenitic stainless steel manufactured by hot isostatic pressing. Met Mat Trans A 47:4467–4475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper AJ, Dhers J, Sherry AH (2016) Mechanistic studies on type 300 stainless steels manufactured by hot isostatic pressing: the impact of Oxygen involvement on fracture behaviour. V06ATA012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor KL, Sherry AH (2012) The characterization and interpretation of ductile fracture mechanisms in AL2024-T351 using X-ray and focused ion beam tomography. Acta Mater 60:1300–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hosokawa A, Wilkinson DS, Kang J, Kobayashi M, Toda H (2013) Void growth and coalescence in model materials investigated by high-resolution X-ray microtomography. Int J Fract 181:51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Daly M, Leonard F, Sherry AH (2014) Application of 3D X-ray tomography to enhance the calibration of ductile fracture models. In: ASME 2014 Pressure vessels and piping conference: American society of mechanical engineers, pp V005T11A7-VT11A7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daly M, Burnett TL, Pickering EJ, Tuck OCG, Léonard F, Kelley R et al (2017) A multi-scale correlative investigation of ductile fracture. Acta Mater 130:56–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McClintock FA (1968) A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech 35:363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tvergaard V (1981) Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 17:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tvergaard V (1982) On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids. Int J Fract 18:237–252

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Met 32:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bernauer G, Brocks W (2002) Micro-mechanical modelling of ductile damage and tearing: results of a European numerical round robin. Blackwell, Oxford, ROYAUME-UNI

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Z (1996) A sensitivity analysis of material parameters for the Gurson constitutive model. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 19:561–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM E112-96: standard test methods for determining average grain size (1996) ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM E1820: standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness (2003) ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rice JR, Tracey DM (1969) On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields∗. J Mech Phys Solids 17:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the UK EPSRC for funding of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cooper, A.J., Tuck, O.C.G., Burnett, T.L., Sherry, A.H. (2018). Ductile Fracture Assessment of 304L Stainless Steel Using 3D X-ray Computed Tomography. In: & Materials Society, T. (eds) TMS 2018 147th Annual Meeting & Exhibition Supplemental Proceedings. TMS 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72526-0_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics