Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evidence Gathering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of European Criminal Procedure

Abstract

Evidence gathering in the European context is regulated on the basis of the transnational cooperation model. Its fundamental instruments are the newborn European Investigation Order (EIO), which includes some elements of the mutual recognition logic. and the traditional letter rogatory inspired by the mutual assistance principle, that now has a much more reduced operational scope. Both are subject to refusal grounds, which aim to protect the fundamental principles of the execution States’ domestic law. The admissibility of the evidence collected is regulated by each national system. The danger of the use of such instruments is that, in order to achieve the maximum of efficiency, they compromise procedural guarantees provided by national law. A desirable remedy is the use of the proportionality test provided by Art. 52.1 of the Nice Charter: in each concrete situation, the investigation acts may interfere with a fundamental right only in the measure that is strictly necessary to carry them out and they do not impair the essential core of such right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Allegrezza S (2011) Critical remarks on the green paper on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one member state to another and securing its admissibility. (9) www.zis-online.com

  • Allegrezza S (2014) Collecting criminal evidence across the European Union: the European Investigation Order between flexibility and proportionality. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 51 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos K (2010) Transnationale Beweiserlangung: 10 Thesen zum Grünbuch der EU-Kommission “Erlangung verwertbarer Beweise in Strafsachen aus einem anderen Mitgliedstaat”. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, pp 557 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambos K (ed) (2011) Europäisches Strafrecht post-Lissabon. Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Arasi S (2014) The EIO proposal and the rules on interception of telecommunications. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Armada I (2015) The European Investigation Order and the lack of European standards for gathering evidence: is a fundamental rights-based refusal the solution? New J Eur Crim Law 6(1):8 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier L (2010) European Investigation Order for obtaining evidence in the criminal proceedings: study of the proposal for a European Directive. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, pp 581 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier Winter L (2013) Transnational criminal proceedings, witness evidence and confrontation: lessons from the ECtHR’s case law. Utrecht Law Rev 9(4):127 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier Winter L (2014) The proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order and the grounds for refusal: a critical assessment. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 71 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier Winter L (2015) Towards the transposition of Directive 2014/41 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. Eucrim (2), pp 47 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmaier Winter L (2017) Cross-border investigation of tax offences in the EU: scope of application and grounds for refusal of the European Investigation Order. Eur Crim Law Rev (1), pp 46 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore R (2014) Critical remarks on the proposal for a European Investigation Order and some considerations on the issue of mutual admissibility of evidence. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 91 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore R (2014) Exchange of DNA data across the EU: issues and perspectives in light of the principle of proportionality. In: Ruggeri F (ed) Criminal proceedings, languages and the European Union. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 181 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore R (2015) The European Investigation Order in criminal matters: developments in evidence-gathering across the EU. Eur Crim Law Rev (3), pp 312 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belluta H (2015) Protection of particularly vulnerable victims in the Italian criminal process. In: Lupària L (ed) Victims and criminal justice. Wolters Kluwer, Assago, pp 251 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Biral M (2014) The right to examine or have examined witnesses as a minimum right for a fair trial. Eur J Crime Crim Law Crim Just 5(4):331 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock J (2010) The European Investigation Order. New J Eur Crim Law 1(4):481 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Buono L (2010) The global challenge of cloud computing and EU law. Eucrim (3), pp 117 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos J (2015) Ladrón de Guevara, La Orden Europea de Investigación Penal en España, aplicación y contenido posible: relación con la Orden Europea de Protección. Diario La Ley, no. 8661

    Google Scholar 

  • Caianiello M (2014) To sanction (or not to sanction) procedural flaws at EU level? Eur J Crime Crim L Crim Just 22(4):317 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderoni F (2010) The European legal framework on cybercrime: striving for an effective implementation. Crime Law Soc Change, pp 339 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Camaldo L (2014) The European Investigation Order. In: Ruggeri F (ed) Criminal proceedings, languages and the European Union. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 203 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli F (2013) Report on Italy. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational inquiries and the protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 439 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Crupi F (2015) New perspectives for the protection of personal data in criminal proceedings in the European Union and repercussions on the Italian legal system. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Human rights in European criminal law. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 261 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniele M (2014) Testimony through a live link in the perspective of the right to confront witnesses. Crim Law Rev (3), pp 189 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniele M (2015) Evidence gathering in the realm of the European Investigation Order: from national rules to global principles. New J Eur Crim Law 6(2):179 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hert P, Papakonstantinou V (2016) The new police and criminal justice data protection directive: a first analysis. New J Eur Crim Law 7(1):7 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hert P, Weiss K, Cloosen X (2009) The framework decision of 18 December 2008 on the European Evidence Warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters - a critical assessment update. New J Eur Crim Law, pp 55 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Depauw S (2017) A European evidence (air)space? Taking cross-border legal admissibility of forensic evidence to a higher level. Eur Crim Law Rev (1), pp 82 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Farries A (2010) The European Investigation Order: stepping forward with care. New J Eur Crim Law 1(4):425 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartunova M (2013) La preuve dans le droit de l'Union européenne. Primento, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher M, Lööf R, Gilmore B (2013) EU criminal law and justice, II edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Flore D (2014) Droit penal européen. Les enjeux d’une justice pénale européenne, II edn. Larcier, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcimartín Montero R (2017) The European investigation order and the respect for fundamental rights in criminal investigations. Eucrim, pp 45 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Gialuz M (2015) Victim’s protection in the case law of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. In: Lupària L (ed) Victims and criminal justice. Wolters Kluwer, Assago, pp 21 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Gless S (2005) Mutual recognition, judicial inquiries, due process and fundamental rights. In: Vervaele JAE (ed) European Evidence Warrant. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 121 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Gless S (2007) Beweisgrundsätze einer grenzüberschreitenden Strafverfolgung. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gless S (2013) Transnational cooperation in criminal matters and the guarantee of a fair trial: approaches to a general principle. Utrecht Law Rev 9(4):90 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Jara Diez C (2010) Models for a system of European criminal law: unification vs. harmonization. New J Eur Crim Law 1(3):385 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss R (2014) Criminal fair trial rights. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grio A (2014) The defendant’s rights in the hearing by videoconference. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 119 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Heard C, Mansell D (2011) The European Investigation Order: changing the face of evidence-gathering in EU cross-border cases. New J Eur Crim Law 2(4):353 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker B (2013) Mutual recognition and transfer of evidence. The European Evidence Warrant. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational inquiries and the protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 269 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker B (2015) Europäisches Strafrecht. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Illuminati G (2015) The victim as a witness. In: Lupària L (ed) Victims and criminal justice. Wolters Kluwer, Assago, pp 65 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssens C (2013) The principle of mutual recognition in EU law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Villarejo Fernández F (2011) Orden europea de investigación: adiós a las comisiones rogatorias? In: Arangüena Fanego C (ed) Cooperación judicial civil y penal en el nuevo escenario de Lisboa. Editorial Comares, Granada, pp 201 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimek L (2012) Free movement of evidence in criminal matters. (4). http://www.ilaw.cas.cz/tlq/index.php/tlq

  • Klimek L (2016) Mutual recognition of judicial decisions in European criminal law. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Klip A (2016) European criminal law. An integrative approach, 3rd edn. Intersentia, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusak M (2017) Common EU minimum standards for enhancing mutual admissibility of evidence gathered in criminal matters. Eur J Crim Pol Res. 14 Mar 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusak M (2017) Mutual admissibility of evidence in criminal matters in the EU. A study of telephone tapping and house search. Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen-Apeldoorn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach A (2009) Transnational gathering of evidence in criminal cases in the EU de lege lata and de lege ferenda. Eucrim (3), pp 107 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Luif P, Trauner F (2014) The Prüm process: the effects of enhanced cooperation within Europe and with the United States in combating serious crime. In: Holzhacker RL, Luif P (eds) Freedom, security and justice in the European Union. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 101 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupària L (2014) Los veinticinco años del proceso penal italiano y las tendencias de reforma en Europa. www.penalecontemporaneo.it, 17 Nov 2014

  • Mangiaracina A (2014) A new and controversial scenario in the gathering of evidence at the European level: the proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order. Utrecht Law Rev 10(1):113 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín García AL, Bujosa Vadell LM (2016) La obtención de prueba en materia penal en la Unión Europea. Editorial Atelier, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez García E (2016) La orden europea de investigación. Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia

    Google Scholar 

  • McClean D (2012) International co-operation in civil and criminal matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen S (2013) Criminal law and policy in the European Union. Routledge, London-New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsilegas V (2009) EU criminal law. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsilegas V (2016) EU criminal law after Lisbon. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy CC (2011) The European Evidence Warrant: mutual recognition and mutual (dis)trust? In: Eckes C, Konstadinides T (ed) Crime within the area of freedom, security and justice. A European public order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 224 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak C (ed) Evidence in EU fraud cases. Wolters Kluwer, Assago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormazábal Sánchez G (2006) La formación del espacio judicial europeo en materia penal y el principio de reconocimiento mutuo. Especial referencia a la extradición y al mutuo reconocimiento de pruebas. In: Armenta Deu T, Gascón Inchausti F, Cedeño Hernán M (eds) El derecho procesal penal en la Unión Europea. Colex, Madrid, pp 37 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaraci T (2014) General considerations on the European Investigation Order. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 37 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan A (2014) Towards a system of European criminal justice: the problem of admissibility of evidence. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri S (2013) Horizontal cooperation, obtaining evidence overseas and the respect for fundamental rights in the EU. From the European Commission’s proposals to the proposal for a Directive on a European Investigation Order: towards a single tool of evidence gathering in the EU? In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational inquiries and the protection of fundamental rights in criminal proceedings. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 279 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri S (2014) Introduction to the proposal of a European Investigation Order: due process concerns and open issues. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Transnational evidence and multicultural inquiries in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri S (2015) Die Verwertung im Ausland erhobener Beweise im europäischen Rechtsraum. Grundrechtliche Probleme und neue Herausforderungen am Beispiel des italienischen Strafprozessrechts. (9). www.zis-online.com

  • Ruggeri S (2015) Transnational prosecutions, methods of obtaining overseas evidence, human rights protection in Europe. In: Ruggeri S (ed) Human rights in European criminal law. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 147 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers D (2011) The European Investigation Order. Travelling without a ‘roadmap’. http://www.ceps.eu

  • Sicurella R, Scalia V (2013) Data mining and profiling in the area of freedom, security and justice. New J Eur Crim Law 4(4):409 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber U, Brüner FH, Satzger H, Von Heintschel-Heinegg B (eds) (2011) Europaieshes Strafrecht. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonato M (2014) Defence rights and the use of information technology in criminal procedure. Rev Int Droit Pen Law, pp 301 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleto Muñoz H, Fiodorova A (2014) DNA and law enforcement in the European Union: tools and human rights protection. Utrecht Law Rev 10(1):149 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JR (2008) The problems of trans-border evidence and European initiative to resolve them. In: Grasso G, Sicurella R (eds) Per un rilancio del progetto europeo. Esigenze di tutela degli interessi comunitari e nuove strategie di integrazione penale. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 471 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinière R, Vial C (2015) Protection des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union Européenne: entre évolution et permanence. Primento, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro G (2015) The Italian system for the protection of victims of crime: analysis and prospects. In: Lupària L (ed) Victims and criminal justice. Wolters Kluwer, Assago, pp 101 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vlis EJ (2012) Videoconferencing in criminal proceedings. In: Braun S, Taylor JL (eds) Videoconference and remote interpreting in criminal proceedings. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 13 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen G (2011) Free gathering and movement of evidence in criminal matters in the EU. Thinking beyond borders, striving for balance, in search of coherence. Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen-Apeldoorn

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen G, De Bondt W, Van Damme Y (2010) EU cross-border gathering and use of evidence in criminal matters. Maklu Publishers, Antwerpen-Apeldoorn

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervaele JAE (ed) (2005) European Evidence Warrant: transnational judicial inquiries in the EU. Intersentia, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuille J, Lupària L, Taroni F (2017) Scientific evidence and the right to a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR. Law Probab Risk (1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyembergh A, De Biolley S (2006) The EU mutual legal assistance convention of 2000 and the interceptions of telecommunications. Eur J Law Reform (2–3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C (2005) Overview of the commission’s proposal for a framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant. In: Vervaele JAE (ed) European Evidence Warrant. Intersentia, Cambridge, pp 69 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarza AG (2015) Exchange of information and data protection in cross-border criminal proceedings in Europe. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerbes I (2015) Legal issues of transnational exchange of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. Eur Crim Law Rev (3), pp 304 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann F, Glaser S, Motz A (2011) Mutual recognition and its implications for the gathering of evidence in criminal proceedings: a critical analysis of the initiative for a European Investigation Order. Eur Crim Law Rev (1), pp 56 ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Marcello Daniele

  2. Italian Court of Cassation, Rome, Italy

    Ersilia Calvanese

Authors
  1. Marcello Daniele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ersilia Calvanese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Daniele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Roberto E. Kostoris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daniele, M., Calvanese, E. (2018). Evidence Gathering. In: Kostoris, R. (eds) Handbook of European Criminal Procedure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72462-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72462-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72461-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72462-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation