Skip to main content

A Characterization of Undirected Graphs Admitting Optimal Cost Shares

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10660))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Chen et al. [7] studied cost sharing protocols for network design with the objective to implement a low-cost Steiner forest as a Nash equilibrium of an induced cost-sharing game. One of the most intriguing open problems to date is to understand the power of budget-balanced and separable cost sharing protocols in order to induce low-cost Steiner forests.

In this work, we focus on undirected networks and analyze topological properties of the underlying graph so that an optimal Steiner forest can be implemented as a Nash equilibrium (by some separable cost sharing protocol) independent of the edge costs. We term a graph efficient if the above stated property holds. As our main result, we give a complete characterization of efficient undirected graphs for two-player network design games: an undirected graph is efficient if and only if it does not contain (at least) one out of few forbidden subgraphs. Our characterization implies that several graph classes are efficient: generalized series-parallel graphs, fan and wheel graphs and graphs with small cycles.

This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - HA 8041/1-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Uniform protocols require that the cost shares on an edge only depend on the edge cost and the set of players, but not on the network itself.

  2. 2.

    The certificate for optimality uses a characterization of uniform protocols by Gopalakrishnan et al. [19].

References

  1. Anshelevich, E., Dasgupta, A., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É., Wexler, T., Roughgarden, T.: The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation. SIAM J. Comput. 38(4), 1602–1623 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilò, V., Bove, R.: Bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games with three players. J. Interconnect. Netw. 12(1–2), 1–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilò, V., Caragiannis, I., Fanelli, A., Monaco, G.: Improved lower bounds on the price of stability of undirected network design games. Theory Comput. Syst. 52(4), 668–686 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilò, V., Flammini, M., Moscardelli, L.: The price of stability for undirected broadcast network design with fair cost allocation is constant. In: 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2013, 26–29 October, 2013, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp. 638–647 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cenciarelli, P., Gorla, D., Salvo, I.: Graph theoretic investigations on inefficiencies in network models. CoRR abs/1603.01983 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, H.L., Roughgarden, T.: Network design with weighted players. Theory Comput. Syst. 45(2), 302–324 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, H.L., Roughgarden, T., Valiant, G.: Designing network protocols for good equilibria. SIAM J. Comput. 39(5), 1799–1832 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, X., Diao, Z.: Network topologies for weakly pareto optimal nonatomic selfish routing. In: Dinh, T.N., Thai, M.T. (eds.) COCOON 2016. LNCS, vol. 9797, pp. 27–38. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42634-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Diao, Z., Hu, X.: Network characterizations for excluding Braess’s paradox. Theory Comput. Syst. 59(4), 747–780 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Christodoulou, G., Chung, C., Ligett, K., Pyrga, E., van Stee, R.: On the price of stability for undirected network design. In: Bampis, E., Jansen, K. (eds.) WAOA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5893, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12450-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Christodoulou, G., Sgouritsa, A.: Designing networks with good equilibria under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016, Arlington, VA, USA, 10–12 January 2016, pp. 72–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Disser, Y., Feldmann, A.E., Klimm, M., Mihalák, M.: Improving the \({H}_k\)-bound on the price of stability in undirected shapley network design games. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 562, 557–564 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein, A., Feldman, M., Mansour, Y.: Efficient graph topologies in network routing games. Games Econom. Behav. 66, 115–125 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. von Falkenhausen, P., Harks, T.: Optimal cost sharing for resource selection games. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1), 184–208 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Fiat, A., Kaplan, H., Levy, M., Olonetsky, S., Shabo, R.: On the price of stability for designing undirected networks with fair cost allocations. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds.) ICALP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4051, pp. 608–618. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gairing, M., Kollias, K., Kotsialou, G.: Tight bounds for cost-sharing in weighted congestion games. In: Halldórsson, M.M., Iwama, K., Kobayashi, N., Speckmann, B. (eds.) ICALP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9135, pp. 626–637. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gairing, M., Kollias, K., Kotsialou, G.: Cost-sharing in generalised selfish routing. In: Fotakis, D., Pagourtzis, A., Paschos, V.T. (eds.) CIAC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10236, pp. 272–284. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57586-5_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gkatzelis, V., Kollias, K., Roughgarden, T.: Optimal cost-sharing in general resource selection games. Oper. Res. 64(6), 1230–1238 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gopalakrishnan, R., Marden, J.R., Wierman, A.: Potential games are Necessary to ensure pure nash equilibria in cost sharing games. Math. Oper. Res. 39(4), 1252–1296 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Harks, T., von Falkenhausen, P.: Optimal cost sharing for capacitated facility location games. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(1), 187–198 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Harks, T., Peis, B.: Resource buying games. Algorithmica 70(3), 493–512 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Harks, T., Huber, A., Surek, M.: A characterization of undirected graphs admitting optimal cost shares (2017). arXiv:1704.01983v2 [cs.GT]

  23. Hoefer, M.: Competitive cost sharing with economies of scale. Algorithmica 60, 743–765 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Klimm, M., Schmand, D.: Sharing non-anonymous costs of multiple resources optimally. In: Paschos, V.T., Widmayer, P. (eds.) CIAC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9079, pp. 274–287. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18173-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kollias, K., Roughgarden, T.: Restoring pure equilibria to weighted congestion games. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 3(4), 1–21 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Schäfer, G., van Zwam, S.: A group-strategyproof cost sharing mechanism for the Steiner forest game. SIAM J. Comput. 37(5), 1319–1341 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, E., Ligett, K.: Improved bounds on the price of stability in network cost sharing games. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2013, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 16–20 June 2013, pp. 607–620 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, J.: An \(o(\log n\log \log n)\) upper bound on the price of stability for undirected shapley network design games. Inf. Process. Lett. 109(15), 876–878 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Mamageishvili, A., Mihalák, M., Montemezzani, S.: An \({H_{n/2}}\) upper bound on the price of stability of undirected network design games. In: Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Dietzfelbinger, M., Ésik, Z. (eds.) MFCS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8635, pp. 541–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44465-8_46

    Google Scholar 

  30. Milchtaich, I.: Network topology and the efficiency of equilibrium. Games Econ. Behav. 57(2), 321–346 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Pál, M., Tardos, É.: Group strategyproof mechanisms via primal-dual algorithms. In: FOCS, pp. 584–593 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roughgarden, T., Schrijvers, O.: Network cost-sharing without anonymity. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 4(2), 8 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Surek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Harks, T., Huber, A., Surek, M. (2017). A Characterization of Undirected Graphs Admitting Optimal Cost Shares. In: R. Devanur, N., Lu, P. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10660. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71924-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71923-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71924-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics