Skip to main content

Health Information Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chronic Illness Care

Abstract

Health information technology (IT) systems have been demonstrated to improve the processes of care and outcomes related to chronic disease. Less than 25% of ambulatory practices were using electronic health records (EHRs) in 2004; however, this number increased to more than 80% a decade later. This expansion can be attributed to the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), which was designed to stimulate adoption of EHRs into the US healthcare system. HITECH promoted the “meaningful use” of EHRs in ways that would (1) electronically capture key patient health information, (2) use electronic patient information to facilitate clinical decision support, (3) facilitate reporting of quality measures to inform quality improvement efforts and to facilitate pay-for-performance reimbursement structures, (4) encourage patient self-management, and (5) improve transitions of care by facilitating sharing of patient information among treating providers. Sociotechnical factors are strong determinants for the successful implementation of health IT which involve end users in the implementation process, responsiveness to end-user feedback, adequate user training, and consideration of clinical workflow. The future success of health IT has less to do with advances in technology and more to do with viewing health IT as a key tool that needs to successfully integrate into clinical workflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. HealthIT.gov. Basics of health IT 2013. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/patients-families/basics-health-it.

  2. ONC. Office-based physician electronic health record adoption: 2004–2014. Washington, DC: The Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology; 2015. Available from: http://dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physician-ehr-adoption-trends.php.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gillum RF. From papyrus to the electronic tablet: a brief history of the clinical medical record with lessons for the digital age. Am J Med. 2013;126(10):853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang PC, McDonald CJ. Electronic health record systems. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, editors. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 3rd ed: Springer Science, Berlin, Germany; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devine EB, Wilson-Norton JL, Lawless NM, Hansen RN, Hazlet TK, Kelly K, et al. Characterization of prescribing errors in an internal medicine clinic. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64(10):1062–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, Borus J, Burdick E, Poon EG, et al. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(9):837–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brodell RT, Helms SE, KrishnaRao I, Bredle DL. Prescription errors. Legibility and drug name confusion. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(3):296–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(2):166–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Congress.gov. American recovery and reinvestment act of 2009. Washington, DC: Library of Congress; 2009. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. HealthIT.gov. Health IT legislation and regulations 2016. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/policy-researchers-implementers/health-it-legislation.

  14. Sittig DF, Murphy DR, Smith MW, Russo E, Wright A, Singh H. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(4):900–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenes RG. Clinical decision support: the road ahead. 1st ed. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friedlin J, Dexter PR, Overhage JM. Details of a successful clinical decision support system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007:254–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cimino JJ, Li J. Sharing infobuttons to resolve clinicians’ information needs. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:815.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Sappagh S, El-Masri S. A distributed clinical decision support system architecture. J King Saud Univ – Comput Inf Sci. 2013;26(1):69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ACC. 2013 Prevention guidelines ASCVD risk estimator: American College of Cardiology; 2013. Available from: http://www.acc.org/tools-and-practice-support/mobile-resources/features/2013-prevention-guidelines-ascvd-risk-estimator.

  21. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(Suppl 3):i68–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. IOM. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine (IOM), National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fathima M, Peiris D, Naik-Panvelkar P, Saini B, Armour CL. Effectiveness of computerized clinical decision support systems for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes RB, Team CSR. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013;30(6):739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nies J, Colombet I, Degoulet P, Durieux P. Determinants of success for computerized clinical decision support systems integrated in CPOE systems: a systematic review. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:594–8.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, Garg AX, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Souza NM, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Prorok JC, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci. 2011;6:87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nanji KC, Slight SP, Seger DL, Cho I, Fiskio JM, Redden LM, et al. Overrides of medication-related clinical decision support alerts in outpatients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(3):487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wennberg JE. Practice variation: implications for our health care system. Manag Care. 2004;13(9 Suppl):3–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. RWJF. The value of personal health records and web portals to engage consumers and improve quality: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2012. Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2012/07/the-value-of-personal-health-records-and-web-portals-to-engage-c.html.

  31. Krist AH, Woolf SH. A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA. 2011;305(3):300–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R, HEAL NY. Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York State. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long-term funding remains a concern. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(8):1486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rudin RS, Motala A, Goldzweig CL, Shekelle PG. Usage and effect of health information exchange: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(11):803–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fontaine P, Ross SE, Zink T, Schilling LM. Systematic review of health information exchange in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(5):655–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, Shoai RS, Perrin R, Chaney E, et al. Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(2):156–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Research2Guidance. mHealth app developer economics 2016: the current status and trends of the mHealth market; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  38. WeightWatchers. Weight watchers mobile: weight watchers; 2016. Available from: http://www.weightwatchers.com/templates/marketing/marketing_utool_1col.aspx?pageid=1191351.

  39. Miller AS, Cafazzo JA, Seto E. A game plan: gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(2):184–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fitocracy. Fitocracy: Fitocracy; 2016. Available from: https://www.fitocracy.com/.

  41. FitnessKeeper. RunKeeper: FitnessKeeper; 2016. Available from: https://runkeeper.com/.

  42. MangoHealth. Mango Health: Mango Health; 2016. Available from: https://www.mangohealth.com/.

  43. mySugr. mySugr: mySugr; 2016. Available from: https://mysugr.com/.

  44. Gee PM, Greenwood DA, Paterniti DA, Ward D, Miller LM. The eHealth enhanced chronic care model: a theory derivation approach. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlton R. Moore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moore, C.R. (2018). Health Information Technology. In: Daaleman, T., Helton, M. (eds) Chronic Illness Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71812-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71812-5_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71811-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71812-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics