Skip to main content

John Laws/Sade: Postmodern or Postdramatic?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Postdramatic Theatre
  • 791 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of postdramatic theatre by offering two readings of The Sydney Front’s 1987 production John Laws/Sade. Initially described as a work of postmodern performance, the work displays many of the features Lehmann identifies with postdramatic theatre. It examines the similarities and differences between the vocabularies of postmodern theatre and postdramatic theatre as they are used to describe and redescribe John Laws/Sade, respectively. The chapter pays particular attention to the relationship between postdramatic theatre and the tradition of twentieth-century avant-garde drama in Europe by identifying the ways that Péter Szondi’s book Theory of Modern Drama informs Lehmann’s concept of the postdramatic. The chapter concludes with an account of the ethical perils generated by teaching avant-garde performance through practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Artaud, Antonin. 1958. The Theater and Its Double. Translated by Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. The Theatre and Its Double. In Collected Works, translated by Victor Corti, vol. 4. London: Calder & Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auslander, Philip. 2002. From Acting to Performance: Essays in Modernism and Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1983. Simulations. Translated by Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Birringer, Johannes. 1991. Theatre, Theory, Postmodernism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Marvin. 1996. Performance: A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Steven. 1989. Postmodernist Culture: An Introduction to Theories of the Contemporary. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1978. The Theater of Cruelty and the Closure of Representation. In Writing and Difference, 292–316. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frow, John. 1991. What Was Postmodernism? Sydney: Local Consumption Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Elinor. 1996. The Death of Character: Perspectives on Theater after Modernism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, Jane. 1994. Artaud and the Gnostic Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Clare. 2012. Staging the Audience: The Sydney Front 1986–1993. Melbourne: Contemporary Arts Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1983. Modernity—An Incomplete Project. In The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, ed. Hal Foster, 3–15. Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Margaret. 2008. Postdramatic Theatre and Australia: A ‘New’ Theatre Discourse. Australasian Drama Studies 52: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, Michael. 1983. Drama and Dramatic Theory: Péter Szondi and the Modern Theater. Boundary 2 (11): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvel, Michael Vanden. 2001. “Is Postmodernism?” Stoppard Amongst/Against the Postmoderns. In The Cambridge Companion to Tom Stoppard, ed. Katherine E. Kelly, 213–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, Linda. 1989. The Politics of Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, Fredric. 1998. Postmodernism and Consumer Society. In The Cultural Turn. Essays on the Postmodern 1983–1998, 111–125, 1–20. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürs-Munby, Karen. 2006. Translator’s Introduction to Postdramatic Theatre, 1–15. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürs-Munby, Karen, Jerome Carroll, and Steve Giles, eds. 2013. Postdramatic Theatre and the Political: International Perspectives on Contemporary Performance. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Nick. 1994. Postmodernism and Performance. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Alan. 2006. The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond. Philosophy Now, 34–37, November/December.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Digimodernism: How New Technologies Dismantle the Postmodern and Reconfigure Our Culture. New York and London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ladies Lounge. 1997. Presented by Judith Lucy and Helen Razer. Triple J, ABC Australia, broadcast date unknown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Translated and with an introduction by Karen Jürs-Munby. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoffrey Bennington and Brian Massumi. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealon, Jeffrey. 2012. Post-Postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavis, Patrice. 1992. Theatre at the Crossroads of Culture. Translated by Loren Kruger. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggioli, Renato. 1968. The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1984. Habermas and Lyotard on Post-Modernity. Praxis International 4 (1): 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, Kerrie. 1999. The Politics of Poaching in Postmodern Performance: A Case Study of the Sydney Front’s Don Juan in Rehearsal and Performance. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiderman. 2002. DVD. Directed by Sam Raimi. Los Angeles: Columbia Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szondi, Péter. 1987. Theory of the Modern Drama. Edited and translated by Michael Hays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waites, James. 1991. Treading a Fine Line. The Sydney Front and Don Juan: Exploring the Actor-Audience Nexus. The Sydney Review (April): 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

D’Cruz, G. (2018). John Laws/Sade: Postmodern or Postdramatic?. In: Teaching Postdramatic Theatre. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71685-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics