Skip to main content

Abstract

Recent literature on technological changes has highlighted the role of knowledge recombination in innovation. Evidence suggests that the production of scientific and technological knowledge is becoming an increasingly collective phenomenon. Thus, in rapidly developing industries, it is almost inevitable to develop inter-organizational collaborations to identify new opportunities for new technologies.

The aim of this chapter was to explore the innovative activities and networks in European regions (EU 27 plus Norway and Switzerland) from 1980 to 2010. Specifically, we analysed the most innovative sectors: environmental (green), biotechnology (biotech), laser and optic technology and nanotechnology (nanotech). This longitudinal study relies on European Patent Office (EPO) patents and inventors’ data by year and region, as provided by OECD-Regpat database. Our main findings emphasize the rise of co-inventions in intra-regional and inter-regional inventive networks, the concentration of innovations in central regions and peripheral regions’ reliance on external knowledge flows to compensate for their technological weaknesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reg_share is less than 1if the inventor is assigned to different regions because of moving in the three years preceding the patent’s priority year. Inv_share is less than 1 when patent is co-invented.

  2. 2.

    Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.

References

  • Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45, 875–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. (2011). A functional theory of technology and technological change. In Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change (p. 286). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2010). The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 120–135). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassi, L., & Plunket, A. (2015). Research collaboration in co-inventor networks: Combining closure, bridging and proximities. Regional Studies, 49(6), 936–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003a). The era of open innovation. The MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(Spring), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003b). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J., Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1984). Long waves, inventions and innovations. In C. Freeman (Ed.), Long waves and the world economy. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2007). Eurostat indicators on high-tech industry and knowledge – Intensive services, Annex 6 – High-tech aggregation by patents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2014). Aggregations of manufacturing based on NACE Rev. 2, Annex 3 – High-tech aggregation by NACE Rev. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1991). Network of innovators: A synthesis of research issue. Research Policy, 20, 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1994). The handbook of industrial innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, C., Latham, W., & Le Bas, C. (2008). Collective knowledge, prolific inventors and the value of inventions: An empirical study of French, German and British patents in the US, 1975–1999. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1–2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, J., Sawers, D., & Stillerman, R. (1958). The sources of invention. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. A. (2011). Complexity and innovation dynamics. In Handbook on the economic complexity of technological change (Vol. 63). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (1992). Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal, 102(2), 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2000, January). Evolutionary phenomena in technological change. In Technological innovation as an evolutionary process (pp. 52–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1999). Technology, management and systems of innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3), 228–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Giannella, E. (2010). Collective invention and inventor networks. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1, 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallet, A., & Torre, A. (1999). Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? GeoJournal, 49(4), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1947). The creative response in history. Journal of Economic History, 7(02), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strumsky, D., Lobo, J., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2011). Measuring the relative importance of reusing, recombining and creating technologies in the process of invention, SFI Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strumsky, D., Lobo, J., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2012). Using patent technology codes to study technological change. Economics of Innovation and New technology, 21(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Wal, A. L. (2013). The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: Geographic proximity versus triadic closure. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 589–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushmann, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Looy, B., Vereyen, C., & Schmoch, U. (2014, October). Patent statistics: Concordance IPC V8 – NACE REV.2, Eurostat, Euopean Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youn, H., Bettencourt, L., Strumsky, D., & Lobo, J. (2014). Invention as a combinatorial process: Evidence from US patents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2938.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This EU research project was funded under the FP7 grant number 320131, SMARTSPEC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiorenza Belussi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Technological manufacturing industry classifications
Table 7 NACE Rev. 2—IPC V8 concordance (NACE 2-digit level)
Table 8 Innovative industry classifications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Belussi, F., De Noni, I., Orsi, L. (2018). Mapping Inventors’ Networks to Trace Knowledge Flows Among EU Regions. In: Isaksen, A., Martin, R., Trippl, M. (eds) New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics