Abstract
Our second core tenet of Critical Physical Geography contends that environmental science is composed of value-laden choices that do not simply reflect the biophysical world and that such choices produce material consequences. This chapter elaborates these claims through constructing a framework for understanding the politics of environmental science. We identify distinct moments within the scientific process that can be used as entry points for thinking about choices and their consequences. Looking inside the ‘black box’ of science, we explore how the scientific process is political in its theory, data, methods, and intended application. The choices that scientists make about these aspects of the scientific process are products of, and in turn reproduce, particular socio-political values and framings of the world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashmore, P. 2015. Towards a sociogeomorphology of rivers. Geomorphology 251: 149–156.
Bauer, B.O., T.T. Veblen, and J.A. Winkler. 1999. Old methodological sneakers: Fashion and function in a cross-training era. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 89 (4): 679–687.
Blue, B., and G. Brierley. 2016. “But what do you measure?” Prospects for a constructive Critical Physical Geography. Area 48 (2): 190–197.
Callon, M. 1999. The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 81–94.
Carey, M., et al. 2016. Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research. Progress in Human Geography 40 (6): 1–24.
———. 2017. Impacts of glacier recession and declining meltwater on mountain societies. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2): 350–359.
Castree, N. 2016. Geography and the new social contract for global change research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3): 328–347.
Church, M. 2009. Relevance: The application of physical geographic knowledge. In Key concepts in geography, ed. N.J. Clifford et al. London: SAGE.
———. 2011. Observation and experiments. In The SAGE handbook of geomorphology, ed. K. Gregory and A.S. Goudie, 121–142. London: SAGE.
Clark, W.C., et al. 2016. Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17): 4570–4578.
Clarke, G.K.C. 1987. A short history of scientific investigations on glaciers. Journal of Glaciology (Special Issue): 4–24.
Cruikshank, J. 2005. Do glaciers listen? Local knowledge, colonial encounters, and social imagination. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Cullum, C., et al. 2016. Ecological classification and mapping for landscape management and science. Progress in Physical Geography 40 (1): 38–65.
Davenport, C., et al. 2015. Greenland is melting away. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/27/world/greenland-is-melting-away.html.
Delborne, J.A. 2008. Transgenes and transgressions: Scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice. Social Studies of Science 38 (4): 509–541.
Dozier, J. 1976. An examination of the variance minimization tendencies of a supraglacial stream. Journal of Hydrology 31: 359–380.
Fernández, R.J. 2016. How to be a more effective environmental scientist in management and policy contexts. Environmental Science and Policy 64: 171–176.
Forsyth, T. 2003. Critical political ecology: The politics of environmental science. Oxon: Routlledge.
———. 2015. Integrating science and politics in political ecology. In The international handbook of political ecology, ed. R.L. Bryant, 103–116. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Goldman, M.J., P. Nadasdy, and M.D. Turnder, eds. 2011. Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iken, A. 1981. The effect of the subglacial water pressure on the sliding velocity of a glacier in an idealized numerical model. Journal of Glaciology 27 (97): 407–421.
Kennedy, B.A. 2006. Inverting the earth: Ideas on landscape development since 1740. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Knight, P.G. 1999. Glaciers. Cheltenham, UK: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.
Kuhn, T.S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lane, S.N. 2001. Constructive comments on D Massey’s ‘Space-time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geography’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographies 26 (2): 243–256.
———. 2017. Slow science, the geographical expedition, and Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer 61 (1): 84–101.
Larson, B. 2011. Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, R., et al. 2014. Intervention: Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer 58: 1–10.
Merton, R.K., 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Ed. N.W. Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Noh, M.-J., and I.M. Howat. 2015. Automated stereo-photogrammetric DEM generation at high latitudes: Surface Extraction with TIN-based Search-space Minimization (SETSM) validation and demonstration over glaciated regions. GIScience & Remote Sensing 52 (2): 1–20.
O’Reilly, J. 2017. The technocratic Antarctic: An ethnography of scientific expertise and environmental governance. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Olefs, M., and A. Fischer. 2008. Comparative study of technical measures to reduce snow and ice ablation in Alpine glacier ski resorts. Cold Regions Science and Technology 52 (3): 371–384.
Rhoads, B.L., and C.E. Thorn. 2011. The role and character of theory in geomorphology. In The SAGE handbook of geomorphology, ed. K.J. Gregory and A.S. Goudie, 59–77. London: SAGE.
Salas-Zapata, W.A., L.A. Rios-Osorio, and A.L. Trouchon-Osorio. 2013. Typology of scientific reflections needed for sustainability science development. Sustainability Science 8: 607–612.
Salmond, J.A., M. Tadaki, and M. Dickson. 2017. Can big data tame a “naughty” world? The Canadian Geographer 61 (1): 52–63.
Sarewitz, D. 2004. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy 7: 385–403.
Schekman, R. 2013. How journals like nature, cell and science and damaging science. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science.
Shean, D.E., et al. 2016. An automated, open-source pipeline for mass production of digital elevation models (DEMs) from very-high-resolution commercial stereo satellite imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 116: 101–117.
Sherman, D.I. 1996. Fashion in geomorphology. In The scientific nature of geomorphology, ed. B.L. Rhoads and C.E. Thorn, 87–114. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Sismondo, S. 2010. Introduction to science and technology studies. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Smith, L.C., et al. 2015. Efficient meltwater drainage through supraglacial streams and rivers on the southwest Greenland ice sheet. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (4): 1001–1006.
Spencer, T., and S.N. Lane. 2017. Reflections on the IPCC and global change science: Time for a more (physical) geographical tradition. The Canadian Geographer 61 (1): 124–135.
Tadaki, M. 2017. Rethinking the role of critique in physical geography. The Canadian Geographer 61 (1): 73–83.
Thatcher, J., D. O’Sullivan, and D. Mahmoudi. 2016. Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6): 990–1006.
Vaughan, D.G., J.C. Comison, et al. 2013. Observations: Cryosphere. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. T.F. Stocker et al. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
King, L., Tadaki, M. (2018). A Framework for Understanding the Politics of Science (Core Tenet #2). In: Lave, R., Biermann, C., Lane, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71460-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71461-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)