Abstract
This chapter examines Critical Physical Geography’s (CPG) pursuit of integrative and transformative research in a spirit of self-criticism and reflexivity. We question the distinctiveness of CPG, the values and politics embedded within it, and the risks and benefits of endeavoring to produce transformative research. Three overarching questions guide our discussion: (1) What, if anything, does CPG offer that is distinct? (2) Can engagement with the politics of knowledge production strengthen rather than undermine scientific inquiry? and (3) Can science be normative, and what are critical physical geographers trying to change?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asafu-Adjaye, J., L. Blomqvist, S. Brand, B. Brook, R. DeFries, E. Ellis, C. Foreman, et al. 2015. An ecomodernist manifesto. [Online]. http://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto-english/. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
Blue, B., and G. Brierley. 2016. ‘But what do you measure?’ Prospects for a constructive Critical Physical Geography. Area 48 (2): 190–197.
Castree, N. 2015. Geographers and the discourse of an earth transformed: Influencing the intellectual weather or changing the intellectual climate? Geographical Research 53 (3): 244–254.
Crowley, K. 2016. Our thinking about crossover scholarship is wrong. Inside Higher Ed. [Online]. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/04/05/value-crossover-scholarship-academics-essay. Accessed 2 Mar 2017.
Davis, M., M. Chew, R. Hobbs, A. Lugo, J. Ewel, G. Vermeij, J. Brown, et al. 2011. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474: 153–154.
Dyer, J.M. 2010. Land-use legacies in a central appalachian forest: Differential response of trees and herbs to historic agricultural practices. Applied Vegetation Science 13: 195–206.
Fischer-Kowalski, M., and H. Haberl. 2002. Sustainable development: Socio-economic metabolism and colonization of nature. International Social Science Journal 50: 573–587.
Galusky, W. 2000. The promise of conservation biology: The professional and political challenges of an explicitly normative science. Organization and Environment 13 (2): 226–232.
Haraway, D. 2015. Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities 6 (1): 159–165.
Jasanoff, S. 2007. Technologies of humility. Nature 450: 33.
———. 2008. Speaking honestly to power. American Scientist 6 (3): 240.
Johnston, R.J. 1986. Fixations and the quest for unity in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 11: 449–453.
Klepeis, P., and B.L. Turner. 2001. Integrated land history and global change science: The example of the southern yucatan peninsular region project. Land Use Policy 18 (1): 27–39.
Kristof, N. 2014. Smart minds, slim impact. The New York Times, 15 February. SR11.
Lackey, R. 2004. Normative science. Fisheries 29: 38–39.
Lahsen, M. 2005. Seductive simulations? uncertainty distribution around climate models. Social Studies of Science 35 (6): 895–922.
Lambin, E.F., B.L. Turner, H.J. Geist, S.B. Agbola, A. Angelsen, J.W. Bruce, O.T. Coomes, et al. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11 (4): 261–269.
Landis, W. 2007. The Exxon Valdez oil spill revisited and the dangers of normative science. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 3 (3): 439–441.
Lane, S.N. 2017. Slow science, the geographical expedition, and Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 61 (1): 84–101.
Lave, R., M. Wilson, E. Barron, C. Biermann, M. Carey, C. Duvall, L. Johnson, et al. 2014. Intervention: Critical Physical Geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 58 (1): 1–10.
Moore, A. 2015. The Anthropocene: A critical exploration. Environment and Society 6 (1): 1–3.
Mountz, A., A. Bonds, B. Mansfield, J.M. Loyd, J. Hyndman, M. Walton-Roberts, R. Basu, et al. 2015. For slow scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 14 (4): 1235–1259.
Pain, R. 2014. Impact: Striking a blow or working together? ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 13 (1): 19–23.
Pielke, R. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Proctor, J.D. 1998. The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (3): 352–376.
Soulé, M. 1995. Reinventing nature?: Responses to postmodern deconstruction. Chicago: Island Press.
Sundberg, M. 2009. The everyday world of simulation modeling: The development of parameterizations in meteorology. Science, Technology and Human Values 34: 162–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biermann, C., Lane, S.N., Lave, R. (2018). Critical Reflections on a Field in the Making. In: Lave, R., Biermann, C., Lane, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71460-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71461-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)