Abstract
Modern physics unfolds on the stage of four-dimensional spacetime. Grappling with century-old ideas of space and time, Albert Einstein revolutionized our understanding of the cosmos by merging space and time into a four-dimensional entity that takes an active role in shaping the laws of physics. While experiments have repeatedly confirmed Einstein’s theories, the abstract character of this physical knowledge contradicts the common sense of many. Based on the physics of relativity and the mathematics of differential geometry, scientists have developed visualizations and representations of spacetime to make Einstein’s ideas more intelligible. This chapter explores the links between the mathematics of space and time and our historic struggle to visualize these concepts. Technology serves as the lens to unpack the fruitful interplay between mathematics, physics, and arts that has shaped our understanding of spacetime. Linking mathematical concepts with physical intuition and artistic vision, imaginative thinkers developed representations that led from simple spacetime diagrams and analogies to powerful numerical simulations and virtual environments that allow exploring the extreme physics of black holes and gravitational waves. Visualizations of spacetime continue to be an active field of research that is driven by interdisciplinary efforts to understand the cosmos.
References
Abbott BP et al (2016) Observation of gravitational waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys Rev Lett 116(6):061102
Akiyama K et al (2019) First M87 event horizon telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole. Astrophys J 875(1):L1
Alcubierre M, Brugmann B (2001) Simple excision of a black hole in 3+1 numerical relativity. Phys Rev D 63(10):104006
Anninos P, Camarda K, Masso J, Seidel E, Suen W-M, Towns J (1995) Three dimensional numerical relativity: the evolution of black holes. Phys Rev D 52(4):2059–2082
Arnowitt R, Deser S, Misner CW (1962) The dynamics of general relativity. In: Witten L (ed) Gravitation: an introduction to current research. Wiley, New York, p 227
Baumgarte TW, Shapiro SL (2010) Numerical relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Born M (1968) Bern’s colloquium, 1955. In: Physics in my generation. Springer, New York
Brandt S, Bruegmann B (1997) A simple construction of initial data for multiple black holes. Phys Rev Lett 78(19):3606–3609
Carbone L, Bond C, Brown D, BrĂĽckner F, Grover K, Lodhia D, Mingarelli CM, Fulda P, Smith RJ, Unwin R, Vecchio A, Wang M, Whalley L, Freise A (2012) Computer-games for gravitational wave science outreach: Black hole pong and space time quest. J Phys Conf Ser 363(1):012057
Carroll SM (2003) Spacetime and geometry: an introduction to general relativity. Pearson, Chicago
Chandler M (1994) Philosophy of gravity: intuitions of four- dimensional curved spacetime. Sci Educ 3(2):155–176
Chandrasekhar S (1992) A mathematical theory of black holes. Oxford University Press, New York
Cole KC (2019) The simple idea behind Einstein’s greatest discoveries. Quanta Magazine, https://www.quantamagazine.org/einstein-symmetry-and-the-future-of-physics-20190626/
Durell CV (1926) Readable relativity. G. Bell & Sons LTD., London
Einstein A (1905) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [On the electrodynamics of moving bodies]. Annalen der Physik 17(10):891–921
Einstein A (1915) Grundgedanken der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie und Anwendung dieser Theorie in der Astronomie [Fundamental ideas of the general theory of relativity and the application of this theory in astronomy]. Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Satzungsberichte 1(1):315
Galison P (1979) Minkowski’s spacetime: from visual thinking to the absolute world. Hist Stud Phys Sci 10:85–121
Gamow G (1940) Mr Tompkins in wonderland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, reprint 19 edition
Goodman AA (2012) Principles of high-dimensional data visualization in astronomy. Astron Nachr 333(5–6):505–514
Guidry M (2019) Modern general relativity: black holes, gravitational waves, and cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hartle JB (2003) Gravity: an introduction to Einstein’s general relativity. Addison-Wesley, San Francisco
Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper and Row, New York
Hentschel K (ed) (1998) The collected papers of Albert Einstein, Volume 8 (English) The Berlin years: correspondence, 1914–1918. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hesse M (1953) Models in physics. Br J Philos Sci 4:98–214
James O, von Tunzelmann E, Franklin P, Thorne KS (2015) Visualizing interstellar’s wormhole. Am J Phys 83(6):486–499
Kapon S, DiSessa AA (2012) Reasoning through instructional analogies. Cogn Instr 30(3):261–310
Kersting M, Steier R (2018) Understanding curved spacetime – the role of the rubber sheet analogy in learning general relativity. Sci Educ 27(7):593–623
Key JS, Hendry M (2016) Defining gravity. Nat Phys 12(6):524–525
Kraus U (2008) First-person visualizations of the special and general theory of relativity. Eur J Phys 29(1):1–13
Minkowski H (1909) Raum und Zeit [Space and Time]. Jahresbericht Deutscher Mathematischer Verein 18:75–88
Minkowski H (1915) Das Relaitivitätsprinzip [The principle of relativity]. Jahresbericht Deutscher Mathematischer Verein 24:372–382
Owen R, Brink J, Chen Y, Kaplan JD, Lovelace G, Matthews KD, Nichols DA, Scheel MA, Zhang F, Zimmerman A, Thorne KS (2011) Frame-dragging vortexes and tidal tendexes attached to colliding black holes: visualizing the curvature of spacetime. Phys Rev Lett 106(15):4–7
Petkov V (2014) Physics as spacetime geometry. In: Springer handbook of spacetime. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–164
Petkov V, Ashtekar A (eds) (2014) Springer handbook of spacetime. Springer, Berlin
Pretorius F (2005) Evolution of binary black-hole spacetimes. Phys Rev Lett 95(12):121101
Ruder H, Weiskopf D, Nollert HP, MĂĽller T (2008) How computers can help us in creating an intuitive access to relativity. New J Phys 10:125014
Russell B (1925) ABC of relativity. Allen & Unwin, London
Stark RF, Piran T (1985) Gravitational-wave emission from rotating gravitational collapse. Phys Rev Lett 55(8):891–894
Steier R, Kersting M (2019) Metaimagining and embodied conceptions of spacetime. Cogn Instr 37(2):145–168
Varma V (2019) Black hole simulations: from supercomputers to your laptop. Ph.D. thesis
Varma V, Stein LC, Gerosa D (2019) The binary black hole explorer: on-the-fly visualizations of precessing binary black holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity 36(9):095007
Vygotsky LS (1998) The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, 5th edn. Springer, New York
Wald RM (1984) General relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Walter S (2014) The historical origins of spacetime. In: Petkov V, Ashtekar A (eds) Springer handbook of spacetime. Springer, Berlin
Weiskopf D, Borchers M, Ertl T, Falk M, Fechtig O, Frank R, Grave F, King A, Kraus U, Müller T, Nollert H-P, Rica Mendez I, Ruder H, Schafhitzel T, Schär S, Zahn C, Zatloukal M (2006) Explanatory and illustrative visualization of special and general relativity. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 12(4):522–34
Wheeler JA (1998) Geons, black holes, and quantum foam: a life in physics. W.W. Norton&Company, New York
Woodhouse NMJ (2014) Relativity today. In: Petkov V, Ashtekar A (eds) Springer handbook of spacetime. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kersting, M. (2020). Visualizing Four Dimensions in Special and General Relativity. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_120-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70658-0_120-1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70658-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering