Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility as a Voluntary Initiative But a Mandatory Non-financial Reporting Link Between the Social and Financial Performance of Romanian Companies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

This chapter covers the issue of social responsibility in a double sense: a pragmatic research on how Romanian companies publish information on social responsibility and an empiric research on the connection between the social (CSR) and financial performance of companies (CFP). The conclusion drawn from the study of the official websites of 665 companies shows quite a low interest in CSR reporting. The link between CSR and CFP was only analysed for companies identified as publishing non-financial information. A linear regression model with a numeric endogenous variable (the turnover index, IT) and a dummy exogenous variable (CSR, with value 1 - for involvement in CSR projects; 0 - for non-involvement in CSR projects). The results of tests show a very weak connection between IT and CSR, with a slight trend to disfavour companies showing CSR-related concerns, compared to those who do not have such a focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Order of the Ministry of Public Finance no. 1938 of August 17, 2016, published in the Official Gazette of Romania no. 680 of September 2, 2016, available on http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/181377

References

  • Adeneye, Y. B., & Ahmed, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and company performance. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 7(1), 151–166. ISSN 2152-1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E. (1984). An empirical measure of corporatesocial orientation. In L. E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy (Vol. 6, pp. 27–54). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlea Schiopoiu, A., Ionascu, C., Siminica, M., Craciun, L., & Mitrache, M. (2009). The corporate social responsibility on the Romanian. Management & Avenir, 23(3), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byus, K., Deis, D., & Ouyang, B. (2010). Doing well by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and profitability. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 75(1), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2010). Notes: Dummy-variable regression. York SPIDA. Retrieved from http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Courses/SPIDA/dummy-regression-notes.pdf

  • Garcia-Castro, R., Arino, M. A., & Canela, M. A. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0143-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groening, C., Vanitha, S., & Vikas, M. (2015). A contingency framework of firm’s corporate social responsibility profile and firm value. Working paper, Kent State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovic-Djukic, M., & Lepojevic, V. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and firm efficiency in Serbia. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 26(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.26.5.8756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Eilert, A. M. (2013). Product and environmental social performance: Varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(10), 1255–1264. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C., Germann, F., & Grewal, R. (2016). Washing away your sins? Corporate social responsibility, corporate social irresponsibility, and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 80, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2015). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015. Retrieved from https://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015-O-201511.pdf

  • Lech, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Theoretical and empirical aspects. Comparative Economic Research., 16(3), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madorran, C., & Garcia, T. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The Spanish case. Revista de Administracao de Empresas, 56(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020160103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S. (2012). Standalone CSR reports: A Canadian analysis. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 6(1/2), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303258971.

  • Popescu, M., Stegăroiu, I., & Crenicean, N. (2015). Considerations regarding the analysis between corporate governance and social responsibility in Romanian companies, in the context of knowledge based economy. Revista de Management È™i Inginerie Economică, 14(2), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reputation Institut, CSR RepTrak® 100. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.reputationinstitute.com/CMSPages/GetAzureFile.aspx?path=~\media\media\documents\global-csr-reptrak-2016_1

  • Thorne, L., Mahoney, L., & Manetti, G. (2014). Motivations for issuing standalone CSR reports: A survey of Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(4), 686–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2013-1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WankeunOh and SeunghoPark. (2015). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in Korea. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, S85–S94. doi:10.1e080/1540496X.2015.1039903

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 16691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00274.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirela Sichigea (Ganea) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex: Results of Quantitative Research

Annex: Results of Quantitative Research

Field of activity

Total comp.

Comp_CSR

Comp_non CSR

Comp_ not investgtd

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

A—Agriculture, forestry and fishing

8

1

13

5

63

2

25

    01 Agriculture, hunting and attached services

7

1

14

4

57

2

29

    02 Forestry and forest management

1

 

0

1

100

 

0

B—Extracting industry

7

2

29

4

57

1

14

    05 Extraction of high and low quality coal

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    06 Extraction of raw oil and natural gas

2

2

100

0

0

0

0

    07 Extraction of metals

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    08 Other extracting activities

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    09 Service activities incidental to extraction

2

0

0

1

50

1

50

C—Processing industry

292

84

29

167

57

41

14

    10 Food industry

29

9

31

18

62

2

7

    11 Manufacture of beverages

10

4

40

6

60

0

0

    12 Manufacture of tobacco products

2

2

100

0

0

0

0

    13 Manufacture of textiles

9

1

11

7

78

1

11

    14 Manufacture of clothes

38

3

8

23

61

12

32

    15 Tanning and dressing of leather; manufacture of luggage, handbags, saddlery and harness n.e.c.

11

1

9

4

36

6

55

    16 Wood processing, manufacture of wood products except furniture n.e.c.

6

4

67

2

33

0

0

    17 Manufacture of paper and paper products

2

1

50

0

0

1

50

    19 Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    20 Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

7

1

14

5

71

1

14

    21 Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations

3

2

67

1

33

0

0

    22 Manufacture of plastic items

15

3

20

11

73

1

7

    23 Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products

7

1

14

6

86

0

0

    24 Manufacture of basic metals

12

7

58

5

42

0

0

    25 Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment

10

2

20

6

60

2

20

    26 Manufacture of computers, electronic and optical products

13

4

31

7

54

2

15

    27 Manufacture of electrical equipment

16

6

38

9

56

1

6

    28 Manufacture of machinery, tools and equipment n.e.c.

18

5

28

12

67

1

6

    29 Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers

47

19

40

19

40

9

19

    30 Manufacture of other transport equipment

13

4

31

8

62

1

8

    31 Manufacture of furniture

18

2

11

16

89

0

0

    32 Other industrial activities n.e.c.

1

0

0

0

0

1

100

    33 Repair, maintenance and installation of machinery and equipment

4

3

75

1

25

0

0

D—Electricity, heating, gas, hot water and air conditioning supply

21

10

48

8

38

3

14

    35 Production and supply of electricity and heating, gas, hot water and air conditioning

21

10

48

8

38

3

14

E—Water distribution; sanitation; waste management, decontamination activities

35

10

29

25

71

0

0

    36 Water collection, treatment and supply

26

4

15

22

85

0

0

    38 Waste collection, treatment and removal; recovery of recyclable materials

9

6

67

3

33

0

0

F—Constructions

23

6

26

13

57

4

17

    41 Constructions of buildings

6

1

17

4

67

1

17

    42 Electrical engineering

12

3

25

7

58

2

17

    43 Special construction works

5

2

40

2

40

1

20

G—Wholesale and retail; Repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles

60

16

27

35

58

9

15

    45 Wholesale and retail; maintenance and repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles

5

0

0

4

80

1

20

    46 Wholesale, except for sale of motor vehicles and motorcycles

22

5

23

13

59

4

18

    47 Retail, except for sale of motor vehicles and motorcycles

33

11

33

18

55

4

12

H—Transport and storage

48

9

19

37

77

2

4

    49 Road transport and pipe-based transport

28

5

18

21

75

2

7

    50 Water-borne transport

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    51 Air-borne transport

2

0

0

2

100

0

0

    52 Storage and support activities for transportation

11

4

36

7

64

0

0

    53 Mail and courier activities

6

0

0

6

100

0

0

I—Hotels and restaurants

13

3

23

9

69

1

8

    55 Hotels and other accommodation facilities

7

0

0

7

100

0

0

    56 Restaurants and other catering services

6

3

50

2

33

1

17

J—Information and communication

32

7

22

21

66

4

13

    58 Editing activities

2

0

0

1

50

1

50

    60 Television programming and broadcasting activities

2

1

50

1

50

0

0

    61 Telecommunications

12

3

25

7

58

2

17

    62 IT service activities

13

3

23

10

77

0

0

    63 Computer service activities

3

0

0

2

67

1

33

K—Financial intermediation and insurance

23

8

35

12

52

3

13

    64 Financial intermediation, except insurance and pension funding

18

6

33

10

56

2

11

    65 Insurance, re-insurance and pension funding (except public insurance funding )

5

2

40

2

40

1

20

L—Real estate transactions

3

1

33

2

67

0

0

    68 Real estate transactions

3

1

33

2

67

0

0

M— Professional , scientific and technical activities

22

7

32

10

45

5

23

    69 Legal and accounting activities

1

0

0

0

0

1

100

    70 Activities of (central) departments, central administrative offices; management and management consulting activities

5

1

20

3

60

1

20

    71 Architecture and engineering activities; testing

7

4

57

3

43

0

0

    72 Research and development

2

1

50

1

50

0

0

    73 Advertising and market study activities

5

0

0

2

40

3

60

    74 Other professional, scientific and technical activities

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    75 Veterinary activities

1

1

100

0

0

0

0

N—Administrative and supporting services

64

13

20

35

55

16

25

    78 Workforce service activities

17

3

18

10

59

4

24

    79 Activities of travel agents and tour operators; other booking and tourist support services

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    80 Investigation and project-related activities

28

4

14

16

57

8

29

    81 Landscaping and building service activities

5

1

20

3

60

1

20

    82 Secretarial activities, support services and other services mainly provided to companies

13

5

38

5

38

3

23

O— Public administration and defence; public social security

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    84 Public administration and defence; public social security

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

Q—Health and social work

6

0

0

6

100

0

0

    86 Human health-related activities

6

0

0

6

100

0

0

R—Shows, cultural and recreational activities

5

0

0

3

60

2

40

    92 Gambling and betting activities

5

0

0

3

60

2

40

S—Other services

2

0

0

2

100

0

0

    95 Repairs of computers, personal items and household items

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

    96 Other services activities

1

0

0

1

100

0

0

Total

665

177

–

395

–

93

–

  1. Source: Authors’ processing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siminica, M., Sichigea (Ganea), M. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Voluntary Initiative But a Mandatory Non-financial Reporting Link Between the Social and Financial Performance of Romanian Companies. In: Idowu, S., Sitnikov, C., Simion, D., Bocean, C. (eds) Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70449-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics