Skip to main content

Foreshadowing of the Future in the Critical Analysis of the Present

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Unfinished System of Karl Marx

Part of the book series: Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy ((LISPE))

  • 1016 Accesses

Abstract

Karl Marx’s Capital (and its various manuscripts) are mostly read as an excellent but disputed analysis of the capitalist mode of production in its ‘classical’ stage in mid-nineteenth century Great Britain, isolated from Marx’s life-long historical-philosophical and strategic-political search for a communist alternative. Brie challenges the view that Marx’s Capital and his economic manuscripts are merely an analysis of the capitalist mode of production, stressing the importance of the historical elements of Marx’s masterpiece and the permanent elaboration of a post-capitalist, that is, communist society in all of the drafts. This approach reveals the embeddedness of Marx’s economic analysis in his search for a strategy of transformation beyond capitalism, and its close link to the workers’ and socialist movements of his time. Brie demonstrates the critical importance of such a Marxian reading for current discussions around socio-ecological transformation towards a post-growth society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    By communism as a social order I understand, in a Marxian sense, an ‘association , in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all’ (Marx and Engels 1848/1976, p. 506) both in this instance and in the following.

  2. 2.

    Here and in the following I refer to ‘Capital’ in its ‘canonical’ form (see Heinrich 2014)—i.e. in three volumes as published in the lifetime of Marx and/or Engels and (as contained) in the ‘Theories of Surplus Value’ based on Marx’s manuscripts from 1861–1863. For the objective of this chapter, the differences between this ‘canonised’ oeuvre and the one constituted by the manuscripts composed between 1857 and 1878 is of no greater relevance (on Marx’s plans for Capital, see Vollgraf 2015; Bock 2015).

  3. 3.

    Likewise, the innovative thrust in Marx’s thought between 1842–1846 was politically inspired: it was a result of his experience as editor of the Rheinische Zeitung and his subsequent involvement in the French communist circles and the Communist League. The same applies to the period from the late 1860s, which saw the emergence of revolutionary tendencies in Russia, the Paris Commune and the rise of particularly German Social Democracy.

  4. 4.

    Marx had come across this problem when he read ‘Labour’s wrongs and labour’s remedy’ by John Francis Bray (1809–1897) in Manchester in 1845. He compiled a remarkably extensive excerpt (Marx 2015) from which he drew time and again (for more elaboration on the reading of Bray see Marx Bohlender 2014, 2015).

  5. 5.

    This particularly includes the works of Justus von Liebig and Carl Fraas (see Saito 2016).

  6. 6.

    General overviews are provided by, inter alia, W.S. Wygodski (1978), Wolfram Storch (1981), Michael Brie (2009) and Peter Hudis (2017).

  7. 7.

    ‘The study of viable alternatives asks of proposals for transforming existing social structures and institutions whether, if implemented, they would generate – in a sustainable, robust manner – the emancipatory consequences that motivated the proposal’ (Wright 2010, p. 21). On the critique of an understanding of communism as a monosubject, or indivisible community, see Brie (1990a) und Ruben (1990, 1995).

Bibliography

  • Arndt, A. (2011). Karl Marx. Versuch über den Zusammenhang seiner Theorie. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzac, H. (2001). The Unknown Masterpiece. New York: NYRB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, J., Fiehler, F., Hüning, H., Lieber, C., Otto, A., Wolfteich, W., & Zieher, A. (1993). Ausbeutung, Selbstverrätselung, Regulation. Der 3. Band des ‘Kapital’. Hamburg: VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1995). The Principle of Hope. Vol. 1. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K.-D. (2015). Zu Inhalten der von Marx geplanten Bücher über das Grundeigentum, den Staat und über den auswärtigen Handel und den Weltmarkt. In R. Hecker, R. Sperl, & C.-E. Vollgraf (Eds.), Marx’ Sechs-Bücher-Plan. Eine Debatte. Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung (pp. 28–36). Hamburg: Argument. Neue Folge 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlender, M. (2014). Marx, ein Exzerpt und der “falsche Bruder”. Zu einer Genealogie der “Kritik der politischen Ökonomie”. In R. Jaeggi & D. Loick (Eds.), Karl Marx—Perspektiven der Gesellschaftskritik (pp. 109–121). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlender, M. (2015). Einführung. In Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), Vierte Abteilung, Band 5: Exzerpte und Notizen, Juli 1845 bis Dezember 1850 (pp. 337–361). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. F. (1839). Labour’s Wrongs and Labour’s Remedy. Leeds: David Green. Retrieved from https://archive.org/download/labourswrongsan01braygoog/labourswrongsan01braygoog.pdf

  • Brie, M. (1990a). Die Erarbeitung einer Konzeption des modernen Sozialismus. Thesen in der Diskussion. Deutsche Zeitschrift Für Philosophie, 38 (3), 218–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brie, M. (1990b). Wer ist Eigentümer im Sozialismus? Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brie, M. (2009). Die Bildungselemente einer neuen Gesellschaft in Marx’ “Kapital”. Blendungseffekte im Verhältnis von Kapitalismusanalyse und kommunistischer Prognose. In e. V. Helle Panke (Ed.), Marx’ Kritik der politischen Ökonomie und die Linke heute. Beiträge eines internationalen Workshops. Pankower Vorträge, Heft 135 (pp. 43–51). Berlin: Helle Panke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brie, M. (2016). A Critical Reception of Accumulation of Capital. In J. Dellheim & F. O. Wolf (Eds.), Rosa Luxemburg: A Permanent Challenge for Political Economy. On the History and the Present of Luxemburg’s “Accumulation of Capital” (pp. 261–303). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M. (1998). Burning Questions of an Old Book: Commodity Fetishism and Class Relations in Volume III of Capital. In R. Bellofiore (Ed.), Marxian Economics. A Reappraisal. Volume 2: Essays on Volume III of Capital Profit, Prices and Dynamics (pp. 276–290). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, P. (2011). Philosophical Thought Experiments: In or Out of the Armchair? In K. Ierodiakonou & S. Roux (Eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts (pp. 145–163). Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. [1844] (1975). Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy. In MECW (Vol. 3, pp. 418–443). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. [1883] (1989). The Funeral of Karl Marx. In MECW (Vol. 24, pp. 467–471). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. [1891] (1989). Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. In MECW (Vol. 24, pp. 281–325). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. [1894] (1981). Preface. In Capital, Volume 3 (pp. 91–111). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. (2014). Von den ‘kanonischen’ Texten zu Marx’ ungeschriebenem Kapital. In R. Jaeggi & D. Loick (Eds.), Karl Marx—Perspektiven der Gesellschaftskritik (pp. 122–440). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, P. (2017). Imagining Society Beyond Capital. In I. Schmidt & C. Fanelli (Eds.), Reading “Capital” Today. Marx after 150 Years (pp. 181–199). London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. (2013). Das Morgen tanzt im Heute. Transformation im Kapitalismus und über ihn hinaus. Hamburg: VSA. Retrieved from http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/sonst_publikationen/VSA_Klein_Das_Morgen.pdf

  • Mach, E. (1917). Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1939] (1973). Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1844a] (1974). Economic-Philosophical Manuscripts (1844). In Early Writings (pp. 279–400). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1844b] (1975). Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. Introduction. In MECW (Vol. 3, pp. 175–187). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1846] (1976). The Poverty of Philosophy. In MECW (Vol. 6, pp. 105–212). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1851a] (1982). To Engels, 7 January 1951. In MECW (Vol. 38, pp. 258–263). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1851b] (1982). To Engels, 14 August 1851. In MECW (Vol. 38, pp. 422–425). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1857] (1982). To Engels, 8 December 1957. In MECW (Vol. 40, pp. 214–217). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1859] (1983). To Joseph Weydemeyer, 1 February 1959. In MECW (Vol. 40, pp. 374–377). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1961–63] (1989). Economic Manuscripts of 1861–1863. In MECW (Vol. 32). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1867] (1976). Capital, Volume 1. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1867] (1987). To Johann Philipp Becker, 17 April 1867. In MECW (Vol. 42, pp. 358–359). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1868). Letter to Ludwig Kugelmann, 17 March 1968. In MECW (Vol. 42, pp. 551–553).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1874] (1989). Notes on Bakunin’s Book Statehood and Anarchy. In MECW (Vol. 24, pp. 485–526). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1875] (1989). Critique of the Gotha Program. In MECW (Vol. 24, pp. 75–99). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. [1894] (1981). Capital, Volume 3. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1890). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. In MEW, Bd. 23. Berlin: Dietz (In English: Marx, K. [1894] (1981). Capital (Vol. 3). London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2015). Exzerpte aus John Francis Bray: Labour’s Wrongs and Labour’s Remedy. In MEGA, IV. Abt., Bd. 5: Exzerpte und Notizen. Juli 1845 bis Dezember 1850 (pp. 5–59). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. [1848] (1976). Manifesto of the Communist Party. In MECW (Vol. 6, pp. 477–519). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. [1845/56] (1975). The German Ideology. MECW, 5, 19–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (1991). Über Marx’ Entwurf des dritten Buches des “Kapitals.”. In C.-E. Vollgraf, R. Sperl, & R. Hecker (Eds.), Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung. Neue Reihe: Studien zum Werk von Marx und Engels (pp. 119–129). Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2005). Über den Glauben an den ökonomischen Determinismus [1947]. In K. Polanyi, M. Cangiani, K. Polanyi-Levitt, & C. Thomasberger (Eds.), Chronik der großen Transformation: Artikel und Aufsätze (1920–1945). Bd. 3: Menschliche Freiheit, politische Demokratie und die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Sozialismus und Faschismus (pp. 325–334). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, H. (2007). Zum Problem der dialektischen Darstellung ökonomischer Kategorien im Rohentwurf des Kapitals. In R. Hecker, R. Sperl, & C.-E. Vollgraf (Eds.), Geld—Kapital -Wert. Beiträge zur Marx-Engels-Forschung. Neue Folge 2007 (pp. 87–104). Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röttgers, K. (1975). Kritik und Praxis: Zur Geschichte des Kritikbegriffs von Kant bis Marx. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, P. (1990). Was ist Sozialismus? Zum Verhältnis von Gemein- und Personeneigentum an Produktionsmitteln. Initial, 2, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruben, P. (1995). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft—erneut betrachtet. In Philosophische Schriften—Online-Edition. Retrieved from www.peter-ruben.de

  • Saito, K. (2016). Natur gegen Kapital. Marx’ Ökologie in seiner unvollendeten Kritik des Kapitalismus. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1964). Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York/London: McGraw-Hill Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieferle, R. P. (2011). Karl Marx zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, W. (1981). Die Ausarbeitung der politischen Ökonomie der Arbeiterklasse im “Kapital” und ihre Bedeutung für die Weiterentwicklung der Erkenntnisse über die kommunistische Gesellschaft. In R. Dlubek & R. Merkel (Eds.), Marx und Engels über die sozialistische und kommunistische Gesellschaft. Die Entwicklung der marxistischen Lehre von der kommunistischen Umgestaltung (pp. 188–245). Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wygodski, W. S. (1978). Das Werden der ökonomischen Theorie von Marx und der wissenschaftliche Kommunismus. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brie, M. (2018). Foreshadowing of the Future in the Critical Analysis of the Present. In: Dellheim, J., Wolf, F. (eds) The Unfinished System of Karl Marx. Luxemburg International Studies in Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70347-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70347-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70347-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics