Skip to main content

Understanding Anthropomorphism: Anthropomorphism is not a Reverse Process of Dehumanization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10652))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Anthropomorphism plays an important role in human interaction with robots. However, our understanding of this phenomenon is still limited. In the previous research, we proposed to look at the work on dehumanization in order to understand what factors can affect a robot’s anthropomorphism. Moreover, considering that there are two distinct dimensions of humanness, a two-dimensional model of anthropomorphism was proposed. In this paper we present a study in which we manipulated the perceived intentionality of a robot and appearance (Robovie R2 vs Geminoid HI-2), and measured how they affected the anthropomorphization of the robots on two dimensions of humanness. We did not find statistically significant differences in attribution of human traits and mind along two dimensions of humanness. However, after dividing the traits based on their valence, we found that Geminoid HI-2 was attributed significantly more negative human traits than Robovie R2. These results do not support the proposed two-dimensional model of anthropomorphism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bastian, B., Laham, S.M., Wilson, S., Haslam, N., Koval, P.: Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: the implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 50(3), 469–483 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., Wagner, C.: Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: a case study. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Viareggio, Italy, pp. 646–651 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, K., Lohan, K.S., Foth, K.: Levels of embodiment: linguistic analyses of factors influencing HRI. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2012), pp. 463–470 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gray, H.M., Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812), 619 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray, K., Wegner, D.: Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1), 125–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray, K., Waytz, A., Young, L.: The moral dyad: a fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychol. Inq. 23(2), 206–215 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haslam, N.: Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10(3), 252–264 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., Bain, P.: Attributing and denying humanness to others. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 19(1), 55–85 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho, C., MacDorman, K.: Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: developing and validating an alternative to the godspeed indices. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1508–1518 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahn Jr., P.H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B.T., Ruckert, J.H., Shen, S., Gary, H.E., Reichert, A.L., Freier, N.G., Severson, R.L.: Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? In: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 33–40. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamide, H., Eyssel, F., Arai, T.: Psychological anthropomorphism of robots: measuring mind perception and humanity in Japanese context. In: Herrmann, G., Pearson, M.J., Lenz, A., Bremner, P., Spiers, A., Leonards, U. (eds.) ICSR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8239, pp. 199–208. Springer, Cham (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Salem, M., Eyssel, F., Rohlfing, K., Kopp, S., Joublin, F.: Effects of gesture on the perception of psychological anthropomorphism: a case study with a humanoid robot. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) ICSR 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7072, pp. 31–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., Scassellati, B.: No fair!! an interaction with a cheating robot. In: 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2010, Osaka, Japan, pp. 219–226 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sims, V.K., Chin, M.G., Lum, H.C., Upham-Ellis, L., Ballion, T., Lagattuta, N.C.: Robots’ auditory cues are subject to anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 3, pp. 1418–1421 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, E., Lignos, C., Vatsal, A., Scassellati, B.: Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanold robot behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2006), vol. 2006, pp. 180–185 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Złotowski, J., Strasser, E., Bartneck, C.: Dimensions of anthropomorphism: from humanness to humanlikeness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 66–73. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kaiko Kuwamura, Daisuke Nakamichi, Junya Nakanishi, Masataka Okubo and Kurima Sakai for their help with data collection. This work was partially supported by JST CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) research promotion program “Creation of Human-Harmonized Information Technology for Convivial Society” Research Area, ERATO and ISHIGURO symbiotic Human-Robot Interaction Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Złotowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Złotowski, J., Sumioka, H., Bartneck, C., Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H. (2017). Understanding Anthropomorphism: Anthropomorphism is not a Reverse Process of Dehumanization. In: Kheddar, A., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10652. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70021-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70022-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics