Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Origin of the Legitimacy of Organizations and Their Determining Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex Systems: Solutions and Challenges in Economics, Management and Engineering

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 125))

Abstract

The aim of this research consists in analysing to what extent personal characteristics have an influence on the assessment process of organizational legitimacy. For this purpose, a questionnaire was used which examines the effect of five personal characteristics on four types of legitimacy. Subsequently, regression analysis was applied on a sample of 258 individuals. The results have shown that the persons with higher social awareness are more prone to make decisions about organizations taking into account the moral, regulatory and cognitive legitimacy. This type of assessment also occurs when the fear of receiving a social sanction increases. Likewise in the perception of a higher economic risk inherent to the result of a decision, people are more likely to make decisions based on cognitive and pragmatic legitimacy. Future research projects may confirm if the results of this investigation are repeated among different activity sectors and different sociodemographic environments. Accordingly, it would be possible to design a conceptual framework where the legitimacy preferences of interest groups are explained by sectors and personal characteristics. The results of this study extend the knowledge in the field of Institutional Theory about the origin of organizational legitimacy and the causes which condition it. It also facilitates improving the strategic planning of organizations by displaying the legitimacy preferences based on each person’s profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aldrich, H.E., Fiol, C.M.: Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Manag. Rev. Acad. Manag. 19(4), 645–670 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso-Almeida, M., Fernández de Navarrete, F.C., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J.: Corporate social responsibility perception in business students as future managers: a multifactorial analysis. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 24(1), 1–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bitektine, A.: Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36(1), 151–179 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco-González, A., Cruz-Suárez, A., Díez-Martín, F.: The EFQM model as an instrument to legitimise organisations. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J., Rueda-Armengot, C. (eds.) Achieving Competitive Advantage through Quality Management, pp. 155–169. Springer International Publishing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, A.D.: Narrative, politics and legitimacy in an IT implementation. J. Manag. Stud. 35(1), 35–58 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaney, D., Lunardo, R., Bressolles, G.: Making the store a place of learning: the effects of in-store educational activities on retailer legitimacy and shopping intentions. J. Bus. Res. (2016). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.104

  7. Chen, J., Wu, H., Yao, X.: Status, legitimacy, and the presence of outside directors in China. Manag. Decis. 54(5), 1205–1221 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, J.Y., Berger, B.K., DeCoster, J.: Developing measurement scales of organizational and issue legitimacy: a case of direct-to-consumer advertising in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Bus. Ethics (2015). http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2498-8

  9. Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, A., Prado-Román, M.: Cognitive legitimacy, resource access, and organizational outcomes. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas 54(5), 575–584 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., Díez-Martín, F.: Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 23(1), 22–30 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., Escamilla-Solano, S.: Nations of entrepreneurs: a legitimacy perspective. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Sahut, J.-M. (eds.) New Challenges in Entrepreneurship and Finance, pp. 157–168. Springer International Publishing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deephouse, D., Carter, S.: An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. J. Manag. Stud. 42(2), 329–360 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deephouse, D.L.: Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Manag. J. 39(4), 1024–1039 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deephouse, D.L., Suchman, M.: Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 49–77. Sage Publications, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C.: Measuring organizational legitimacy: the case of mutual guarantee societies. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 43(junio), 115–144 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C.: Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: a legitimacy perspective. Int. Entrepreneurship Manag. J. 12(4), 1079–1102 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Román, C., Blanco-González, A.: Efecto del plazo de ejecución estratégica sobre la obtención de legitimidad organizativa. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa 19(2), 120–125 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., Blanco-González, A.: Beyond legitimacy: legitimacy types and organizational success. Manag. Decis. 51(10), 1954–1969 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Drori, I., Honig, B.: A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organ. Stud. 34(3), 345–376 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., Jackson, P.R.: Management Research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards, P.J., Roberts, I., Clarke, M.J., Diguiseppi, C., Wentz, R., Kwan, I., Cooper, R., et al.: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Finch, D., Deephouse, D., Varella, P.: Examining an individual’s legitimacy judgment using the value-attitude system: the role of environmental and economic values and source credibility. J. Bus. Ethics 127(2), 265–281 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garud, R., Schildt, H.A., Lant, T.K.: Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5), 1479–1492 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gil Aluja, J.: La selección de inversiones en futuro incierto. Revista de economía y empresa 7(17–18), 61–80 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gil Aluja, J.: El riesgo y la incertidumbre en el momento actual. Revista de economía y empresa 8(20–21), 7–28 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., Hinings, C.R.: Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Manag. J. 45(1), 58–80 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haveman, H.A., David, R.J.: Ecologists and institutionalists: friends or foes? In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., Suddaby, R. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 573–595. Sage, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Iglesias Pérez, F.: Estudio de la economía sumergida: relación entre legitimidad y medidas para combatirla. Tesis Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaufmann, A., Gil Aluja, J.: La programación de actividades por el método del semáforo. Revista europea de dirección y economía de la empresa 1(1), 7–14 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liñán, F., Urbano, D., Guerrero, M.: Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship Reg. Dev. (Routledge) 23(3–4), 187–215 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maguire, S., Hardy, C.: Discourse and deinstitutionalization: the decline of DDT. Acad. Manag. J. 52(1), 148–178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Manrai, A.K., Andrews, R.L.: Two-stage discrete choice models for scanner panel data: an assessment of process and assumptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 111(2), 193–215 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Meyer, J., Rowan, B.: Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83(2), 340–363 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mingo, S.: Entrepreneurial ventures, institutional voids, and business group affiliation: the case of two Brazilian start-ups, 2002–2009. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración 26(1), 61–76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oliver, C.: Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(1), 145–179 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.R.: The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pollack, J.M., Rutherford, M.W., Nagy, B.G.: Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract. 36(5), 915–939 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: Rosch, E., Lloyd, B.B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization, pp. 27–48. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ruef, M., Scott, W.: A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Adm. Sci. Q. 43(4), 877–904 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rutherford, M.W., Buller, P.F.: Searching for the legitimacy threshold. J. Manag. Inquiry 16(1), 78–92 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations. SAGE Publications (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Shepherd, D., Zacharakis, A.: A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: an assessment by customers. J. Small Bus. Manag. 41(2), 148–167 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Singh, J., Tucker, D., House, R.: Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Adm. Sci. Q. 31(2), 171–193 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Suchman, M.C.: Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20(3), 571 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas, T.E.: Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 14(3), 186–197 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Überbacher, F.: Legitimation of new ventures: a review and research programme. J. Manag. Stud. 51(4), 667–698 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wood, D.J.: Corporate social performance revisited. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16(4), 691–718 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zimmerman, M., and Zeitz, G.J.: Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(3), 414 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zuckerman, E.W.: The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Am. J. Sociol. 104(5), 1398–1438 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Paseo de Los Artilleros, s/n, 28032, Madrid, Spain

    Camilo Prado-Román, Francisco Díez-Martín, Alicia Blanco-González & Alberto Prado-Román

Authors
  1. Camilo Prado-Román
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Díez-Martín
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alicia Blanco-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alberto Prado-Román
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilo Prado-Román .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lyon Neurosciences Research Center and Biomechanical and Impacts Laboratory, University Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France

    Christian Berger-Vachon

  2. Department of Economics and Business Organization, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Anna María Gil Lafuente

  3. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Janusz Kacprzyk

  4. Department of Intelligent Information Systems, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine

    Yuriy Kondratenko

  5. Department of Management Control and Information Systems, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile

    José M. Merigó

  6. Department of Civil, Energy, Environment and Materials Engineering, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

    Carlo Francesco Morabito

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prado-Román, C., Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, A. (2018). The Origin of the Legitimacy of Organizations and Their Determining Factors. In: Berger-Vachon, C., Gil Lafuente, A., Kacprzyk, J., Kondratenko, Y., Merigó, J., Morabito, C. (eds) Complex Systems: Solutions and Challenges in Economics, Management and Engineering. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69989-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69989-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69988-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69989-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation