Skip to main content

Well Governed, Sustainable and Socially Responsible Financial Corporations: Remote or Real Expectations?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalisation of Corporate Social Responsibility and its Impact on Corporate Governance
  • 1148 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers the efficacy of key reforms across the finance sector since the major crisis in 2008, including capital management standards, responsible lending standards, and the establishment of an incremental framework governing systemically important financial institutions. It suggests that in a best-case scenario, these reforms will enhance the survival prospects of finance entities and the continued functioning of financial systems during extreme events without support from public sources. But without more, these reforms, are unlikely to prevent or mitigate many of the most devastating economic and social costs of financial crises and deep recessions on society. Interest rates are still relatively low and continued access to cheap credit in many countries is undermining lending standards and resulting in levels of indebtedness that are unsustainable and that will exacerbate the resilience of governments and populations in coming decades. Moreover, policies introduced to promote financial stability are not preventing an accumulation of systemic risks and the world is ill-prepared for further financial crises and adverse economic shocks. Mounting systemic risks are exacerbated by fragile financial and economic environments in key areas, high levels of private and or public indebtedness in many countries, greater interconnections between finance and economic activities worldwide, a continuing concentration of assets, liabilities and risks across the finance sector, and increasing levels of financial activity relative to the real economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    King (2016), pp. 2–3 citing a senior Chinese central banker.

  2. 2.

    King (2016), p. 40.

  3. 3.

    Financial Stability Board (2017a).

  4. 4.

    Financial Stability Board (2017b).

  5. 5.

    European Central Bank (2016), p. 3. See also Schinasi (2004). Schinasi notes that financial stability is a broad concept that encompasses private and public participants and the financial infrastructure, including the legal system and regulatory frameworks for financial regulation, supervision and surveillance. He suggests that financial stability entails preventative and remedial dimensions and arises along a continuum. He limits the concept to potential consequences for the real economy and notes that policies aimed at financial stability often involve a trade-off between resilience and efficiency. For example, higher capital requirements reduce the risk of a bank failure but also result in higher capitals costs and foregone investment opportunities.

  6. 6.

    European Central Bank (2016), p. 3. See also International Monetary Fund, Financial Stability Board and Bank for International Settlements (2016), p. 4. This multibody document defines systemic risk as ‘the risk of widespread disruption to the provision of financial services that is caused by an impairment of all or parts of the financial systems, and which can cause serious negative consequences for the real economy.’

  7. 7.

    European Central Bank (2016), p. 3.

  8. 8.

    Bank for International Settlements, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/about.htm?m=3%7C14%7C573.

  9. 9.

    These committees include the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Committee on the Global Financial System, the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, the Markets Committee, the Central Bank Governance Forum, and the Irving Fisher Committee on Central Bank Statistics.

  10. 10.

    These independent organisations include the Financial Stability Board, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors, and the International Association of Deposit Insurers.

  11. 11.

    Membership of the Basel Committee is comprised of the central bank governors and national bank regulators of G20 countries. For an outline of transnational coordination of private law governing international finance, see Brummer (2011), p. 257.

  12. 12.

    The G20 (or Group of Twenty) is an international forum for the governments and central bank governors from 20 major economies. The members include 19 individual countries—Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States, as well as the European Union (EU). The primary aim of the G20 is to promote international financial stability.

  13. 13.

    Of course, the full efficacy of these established standards and rules will only be tested when extreme events or conditions arise and the financial survival of specific corporations are at stake.

  14. 14.

    Corderoy (2016). For an update on the implementation of the Basel standards, see Bank for International Settlements (2016).

  15. 15.

    See e.g., The Joint Forum (2015), p. 11.

  16. 16.

    For an outline of the Basel III standards, see Keefe and Pfleiderer (2013).

  17. 17.

    King (2016), p. 4.

  18. 18.

    European Central Bank (2016), p. 15.

  19. 19.

    Moral hazard exists in banking when bankers are not adequately incentivised to guard against risk because they are protected from the consequences of their actions. Some commentators suggest that moral hazard concerns remain because deposit insurance coverage has generally increased since the crisis. See e.g., Cihak and Demirguc-Kunt (2013), p. 8.

  20. 20.

    The Joint Forum (2015), pp. 1–2.

  21. 21.

    The Joint Forum (2015), pp. 1–2.

  22. 22.

    The Joint Forum (2015), p. 7.

  23. 23.

    Byres (2015), pp. 2–3; Caprio (2013), pp. 2–3, 8–13.

  24. 24.

    The Joint Forum (2015), pp. 1–2.

  25. 25.

    See Clark and Drage (2000), pp. 164–165.

  26. 26.

    See, e.g., European Banking Authority (2016).

  27. 27.

    Federal Reserve (2016), p. 1.

  28. 28.

    See Allen et al. (2014), pp. 14–15.

  29. 29.

    See, e.g., Commonwealth of Australia, Financial System Inquiry (2014), p. 47.

  30. 30.

    The Joint Forum (2015), pp. 2, 7. See also European Central Bank (2016), p. 136.

  31. 31.

    See e.g., Dell’Ariccia et al. (2016), p. 1093.

  32. 32.

    Cerutti et al. (2012), pp. 12, 15. See also Lim and Minne (2014), pp. 2, 8 citing Reinhart and Rogoff (2009), which documents 2678 domestic financial crises (measured on a yearly basis) in the 47 countries for which data was available between 1800 and 2005. Of these events, 919 were currency crises, 155 were domestic debt crises, 532 were banking crises, and 1072 were stock market crashes.

  33. 33.

    Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016).

  34. 34.

    See Crowe et al. (2011).

  35. 35.

    Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016), p. 5. See also Igan and Loungaini (2012).

  36. 36.

    Igan and Loungaini (2012).

  37. 37.

    Aizenman and Pinto (2011), p. 24. Aizenman and Pinto note that the economic output and social costs associated with financial crisis are estimated to average more than 10% of GDP.

  38. 38.

    See, e.g., International Monetary Fund (2012), pp. 14–15.

  39. 39.

    International Monetary Fund (2008), p. 6. See also The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011), pp. xvii–xx; International Monetary Fund Staff Discussion Note (2012), p. 9. The issuance and sale of securitised products across the globe, particularly those linked to subprime mortgages, grew at exponential levels during the 1990s and 2000s.

  40. 40.

    International Monetary Fund (2011), pp. 4–7.

  41. 41.

    The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011).

  42. 42.

    Financial contagion can be defined as ‘a price movement in one market resulting from a shock in another market’: Kodres and Pritsker (2002), p. 772.

  43. 43.

    International Monetary Fund (2016), pp. 61–62. This report notes that legacy economic and financial issues remain today.

  44. 44.

    Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016), p. 9 citing Floden (2014) and Cecchetti et al. (2011). Floden found that countries with higher levels of aggregate household debt to income in 2007 suffered larger consumption reductions controlling for other factors. Ceccchetti examined the relationship between debt and economic growth in 18 advanced countries since 1980 and found that high levels of public and corporate debt adversely affected economic growth and there was a negative relationship between high levels of household debt (above 85% of GDP) and future economic growth.

  45. 45.

    Igan and Loungaini (2012), Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016), p. 7 citing Amronin and Paulson (2009) and Demyanyk and Van Hemert (2011).

  46. 46.

    See Mian and Sufi (2009) and Dynan (2012).

  47. 47.

    Bunn and Rostom (2014), pp. 304–315; Anderson et al. (2014). The Bunn study estimates that the high levels of household debt in the UK resulted in a fall in private consumption of around 2% between 2007 and 2012. The Anderson et al. study found that households with LVRs of 100% reduced their consumption between 2007 and 2011 significantly more than households with LVRs of 60%.

  48. 48.

    Ogawa and Wan (2007).

  49. 49.

    Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016) citing Kelly (2011).

  50. 50.

    See North (2015). See also Igan and Loungaini (2012).

  51. 51.

    See Benes et al. (2016).

  52. 52.

    The Joint Forum (2010).

  53. 53.

    Financial Stability Board (2011a, b, c). Mortgage underwriting concerns the processes lenders use to evaluate loan applications, including the risks of offering a mortgage loan to a borrower.

  54. 54.

    Financial Stability Board (2011a, b, c).

  55. 55.

    Financial Stability Board (2011a, b, c).

  56. 56.

    Financial Stability Board (2011a, b, c), pp. 2–9.

  57. 57.

    European Central Bank (2016), pp. 100–101 and International Monetary Fund, Financial Stability Board and Bank for International Settlements (2016).

  58. 58.

    Aizenman and Pinto (2011), p. 25.

  59. 59.

    See Benes et al. (2016), Dell’Ariccia et al. (2016) and Lim et al. (2015). Dell’Ariccia et al. found that macroprudential tools can reduce the incidences of credit booms and decrease the probability that booms end badly. Lim et al. found that macroprudential tools such as loan-to-valuation and debt-to-income caps, ceilings on credit growth, reserve requirements and dynamic provisioning rules can mitigate the procyclicality of credit.

  60. 60.

    Kragh-Sorenson and Solheim (2014).

  61. 61.

    Reserve Bank of New Zealand (2016).

  62. 62.

    See, e.g., The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011).

  63. 63.

    Many countries now have responsible lending rules. For example, in the United States, Title XIV of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) (the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act) imposes new mortgage underwriting standards, prohibits or restricts specified mortgage lending practices and regulates payments to mortgage loan officers and brokers. Lenders are banned from steering consumers into high cost, unaffordable loans: § 1403, 124 Stat 1376, 2140. Lenders must also verify a borrower’s ability to repay the mortgage in its entirety, including consideration and documentation of specified factors such as the borrower’s credit history, employment status, income and debt-to-income ratio: § 1411(a)(2), 124 Stat 1376, 2142–3.

  64. 64.

    Caprio (2013), p. 14.

  65. 65.

    Financial Stability Board (2011a, b, c), p. 1.

  66. 66.

    Resolution plans are intended to allow systemically important financial institutions to continue or to wind down in an orderly manner, while still protecting depositors, and without the use of taxpayer funds.

  67. 67.

    See Financial Stability Board (2016). See also Peihani (2014) and Walker (2014).

  68. 68.

    Financial Stability Board (2015). The additional capital requirements range from 1 to 3.5% of risk-weighted assets. The higher loss absorbency requirements (along with capital conservation and countercyclical buffers) will become fully effective on 1 January 2019.

  69. 69.

    See, e.g., Lagarde (2014) Lagarde, the managing director of IMF, concludes that the too-big-to-fail problem has not been solved because the largest financial institutions still pose a major source of systemic risk and their implicit subsidies continue. She suggests the behaviour of the financial sector has not changed sufficiently since the financial crisis because the industry ‘still prizes short-term profit over long-term prudence [and] today’s bonus over tomorrow’s relationship.’ See also Dallas (2013).

  70. 70.

    Sarin and Summers (2016), p. 13. The authors note [at 33] that ‘we have no doubt that but for Dodd Frank and regulatory actions, the financial system today would be much more fragile.’ However, they suggest [at 34] that their results do not go as far as to support heavier regulation of large banks. They conclude that consideration needs to be given to market prices as indicators of asset values. The paper highlights a substantial decline in the price-book ratio for the largest financial institutions and suggests this is consistent with a dramatic decline in franchise value, caused at least in part by new regulations. The present author is an experienced analyst of the finance sector and has reservations concerning the paper’s focus on price to book ratios and the hypothesised linkages between the fall in these ratios and the conclusion that further regulation is not required. She suggests it is not surprising that the price to book ratios are well below pre-crisis levels, given the much higher levels of capital included in the book values of financial institutions. She notes that the valuation of a financial entity reflects a wide range of financial indicators of the institution and the broader environment in which it operates, and as this paper highlights, the prospective earnings potential and health of these environments is fragile.

  71. 71.

    See Allen et al. (2014), pp. 4–5.

  72. 72.

    Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), p. 120; International Monetary Fund (2016), p. xiii. See also King and Low (2014). The author acknowledges that interest rates in the United States have risen from historically low levels over the last year, but other countries have not followed.

  73. 73.

    See King (2016). King describes this as a savings glut. See also Dell’Ariccia et al. (2016). Dell’Ariccia et al. note that both stock and real estate prices surge during credit booms and lose traction at the end of a boom creating balance sheet vulnerabilities for the financial and nonfinancial sectors and repercussions for the broader economy.

  74. 74.

    King (2016), p. 43.

  75. 75.

    European Central Bank (2016), pp. 9–11, 32–33, 59, 67; International Monetary Fund (2016), pp. viii–x.

  76. 76.

    European Central Bank (2016), pp. 4, 16–23, 33, 61; Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), p. 3; International Monetary Fund (2016), p. viii.

  77. 77.

    International Monetary Fund (2016), p. xiii; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014).

  78. 78.

    King (2016), pp. 362–363; Yu and Wu (2016), Scott (2016) and McKay (2016). See also Huang (2015), Liu (2015) and Schwarcz (2016).

  79. 79.

    Das (2016).

  80. 80.

    European Central Bank (2016), pp. 4, 16–23, 33, 61; Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), p. 3; International Monetary Fund (2016), p. viii.

  81. 81.

    International Monetary Fund (2016), p. 1.

  82. 82.

    European Central Bank (2016), pp. 11–12, 24–25, 28–30; Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), p. 34; International Monetary Fund (2016), p. x; Gourinchas and Obstfeld (2012). Gourinchas et al. found that domestic credit expansion and real currency appreciation were the most robust and significant predictors of financial crises during the period from 1973 to 2010.

  83. 83.

    King (2016), p. 46.

  84. 84.

    See North and Buckley (2012).

  85. 85.

    North and Buckley (2012); Brummer (2011), p. 265; Aizenman and Pinto (2011), p. 24; Lothian (2012), p. 416. Lothian suggests that the primary aim of regulation should be to ‘ensure the predominance of financial deepening over financial hypertrophy’.

  86. 86.

    Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016), p. 6; European Central Bank (2016), pp. 54–56; Bank for International Settlements (2015), p. 23.

  87. 87.

    Yergin and Stanislaw (2002), pp. 394–395, 415.

  88. 88.

    See, e.g., Milan and Sufi (2016), p. 35. The authors note that since 1960 there has been an unprecedented surge in the scale and scope of financial activities in advanced economies. At present, New York and the City of London are the two largest financial centres.

  89. 89.

    Commission of Experts of the President of the UN General Assembly on Reform of the International Monetary and Financial System (2009), p. 47.

  90. 90.

    Monaghan (2009).

  91. 91.

    Turner (2009).

  92. 92.

    Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga (2011). This study found that systemically large banks achieved lower profitability and operated with higher risk than other banks and concludes that it is not in the shareholders’ interest for a bank to become large relative to its national economy. They hypothesise that inadequate corporate governance structures at these banks enabled managers to pursue risky high growth strategies at the expense of shareholders.

  93. 93.

    Cecchetti and Kharroubi (2012). This study found that a fast-growing financial sector is detrimental to aggregate real growth.

  94. 94.

    See also Cecchetti and Kharroubi (2015). This study found that financial growth disproportionately harms financially dependent and research and development intensive industries; Phillippon (2015) and Tankersley (2014).

  95. 95.

    See s 121(a) of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) (Dodd-Frank) allows the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) to:

    1. (1)

      limit the ability of the company to merge with, acquire, consolidate with, or otherwise become affiliated with another company

    2. (2)

      restrict the ability of the company to offer a financial product or products

    3. (3)

      require the company to terminate one or more activities

    4. (4)

      impose conditions on the manner in which the company conducts one or more activities; or

    5. (5)

      If the Board of Governors determines that the actions described in paragraphs (1) through (4) are inadequate to mitigate a threat to the financial stability of the United States in its recommendation, require the company to sell or otherwise transfer assets or off-balance-sheet items to unaffiliated entities.

    The Trump administration has indicated that it wishes to roll back some of the Dodd-Frank reforms, but it is not clear whether this will include the removal of s 121(a).

  96. 96.

    Financial Stability Oversight Council (2011).

  97. 97.

    Creighton (2016), quoting Friedman.

  98. 98.

    Anginer and Demirguc-Kunt (2014). A study of 12,000 publicly traded banks in more than 45 countries over the period 1998–2012 found that macroprudential regulation that emphasised capital measures reduced systemic risk.

  99. 99.

    Eyers and Grey (2016).

  100. 100.

    Corderoy (2016).

  101. 101.

    Corderoy (2016). See also World Economic Forum (2017), preface; Goldcare (2016). Klaus Schwab, the Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, indicates that ‘continued slow growth combined with high debt and demographic change creates an environment that favours financial crises and growing inequality.’ The Goldcare article reports that Japan pressed G7 leaders to note that ‘the risk of the global economy exceeding the normal economic cycle and falling into a crisis if we do not take appropriate policy responses in a timely manner’. It highlights an increase in global debt of $57 trillion since 2007 and suggests there is a risk of debt crises in China, the United States, the Eurozone and the United Kingdom.

  102. 102.

    See Yergin and Stanislaw (2002), p. 402.

References

  • Aizenman J, Pinto B (2011) Managing financial integration and capital mobility: policy lessons from the past two decades. World Bank Policy Research, August. Working Paper No. 5786

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen F, Goldstein I, Jagtiani J, Lang W (2014) Enhancing prudential standards in financial regulation. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, 3 December. Working Paper No. 14-36

    Google Scholar 

  • Amronin G, Paulson AL (2009) Comparing patterns of default among prime and subprime mortgages. Econ Perspect 33(2):18–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A, Duns C, Jensen T (2014) Household debt and consumption during the financial crisis: evidence from Danish micro data. Danmarks Nationalbank, March. Working Paper No. 89

    Google Scholar 

  • Anginer D, Demirguc-Kunt A (2014) Bank capital and systemic risk. World Bank Policy Research, June. Working Paper 6948

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (2015) Developments in credit risk management across sectors: current practices and recommendations. http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/joint37.htm. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Bank for International Settlements (2016) Basel committee on banking supervision: tenth progress report on adoption of the basel regulatory framework. http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d366.htm. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Bank for International Settlements, About the Basel Committee. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/about.htm?m=3%7C14%7C573. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Benes J, Laxton D, Mongardini J (2016) Mitigating the deadly embrace in financial cycles: countercyclical buffers and loan-to-value limits. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 16/87

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer C (2011) How international financial law works (and how it doesn’t). Georgetown Law J 99:257

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn P, Rostom M (2014) Household debt and spending. Bank of England. Q Bull 54(3):304–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Byres W (2015) Matching expectations with reality. 11 November Keynote address at HKMA/ GARP Global Risk Forum, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio G Jr (2013) Financial regulation after the crisis: how did we get here, and how do we get out? London Stock Exchange Financial Markets Group Special Paper Series

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti S, Kharroubi E (2012) Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper 381

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti S, Kharroubi E (2015) Why does financial sector growth crowd out real economic growth? Bank for International Settlements Working Paper 490

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti S, Monhanty S, Zampolli F (2011) The real effects of debt. Bank for International Settlements Working Paper No. 352

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti E, Dagher J, Dll’Ariccia G (2012) Housing finance and real-estate booms: a cross-country perspective. International Monetary Fund Discussion Note 15/12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihak M, Demirguc-Kunt A (2013) Rethinking the State’s role in finance. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6400

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A, Drage J (2000) International standards and codes. Financial stability review: 162

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of Experts of the President of the UN General Assembly on Reform of the International Monetary and Financial System (2009) 21 September. Report of the Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia, Financial System Inquiry (November 2014) Final report

    Google Scholar 

  • Corderoy J (2016) APRA, April, Basel Committee: another GFC is coming. Australian Broker. http://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/apra-basel-committee-another-gfc-is-coming-214105.aspx. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Creighton A (2016) Lawrence summers says regulators fail to make banks safer, The Australian, 19 September. Available at: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/financial-services/lawrence-summers-says-regulators-fail-to-make-banks-safer/news-story/68aa1276ea89180f7cfba7fe7e9864f7. Accessed 26 June 2017

  • Crowe C, Dell’Arricia G, Denis I, Rabanai P (April 1 2011) How to deal with real estate booms: lessons from country experiences. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 11/91

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallas L (2013) Danger lurking in the shadows: why regulators lack the authority to effectively fight contagion in the shadow banking system. Harv Law Rev 127:729

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S (2016) The world isn’t ready for another banking crisis. 28 July. http://www.smh.com.au. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Dell’Ariccia G, Igan D, Laevan L, Tong H (2016) Policies for macrofinancial stability: dealing with credit booms and busts. Econ Policy 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirguc-Kunt A, Huizinga H (2011) Do we need big banks? evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline. February, World Bank Development Research Group Policy Research Working Paper 5576

    Google Scholar 

  • Demyanyk Y, Van Hemert O (2011) Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Rev Finance Stud 24:1848–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynan K (Spring 2012) Is a household debt overhang holding back consumption? Brookings papers on economic activity

    Google Scholar 

  • European Banking Authority (2016) July 2016 EU-wide stress test results

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2016) May, Financial stability review. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/financialstabilityreview201605.en.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Eyers J, Grey J (2016) Basel’s Bill Coen says bank strength extends beyond capital buffers, 5 April. http://smh.com.au. Accessed 17 June 2017

  • Federal Reserve (2016) Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2016: supervisory stress test methodology and results. https://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/stress-tests/2016-supervisory-stress-test-results.htm. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (2011) January, The Financial Crisis Inquiry report

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Stability Board (2011a) Policy measures to address systemically important financial institutions. http://www.fsb.org/2011/11/r_111104bb/. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Financial Stability Board (2011b) Thematic review on mortgage underwriting and origination practices peer review report, 17 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Stability Board (2011c) FSB principles for sound residential mortgage underwriting practices: consultation paper, 26 October

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Stability Board (2015) Update of list of global systemically important banks. http://www.fsb.org/2015/11/2015-update-of-list-of-global-systemically-important-banks-g-sibs/. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Financial Stability Board (November 21 2016) 2016 list of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). http://www.fsb.org/2016/11/2016-list-of-global-systemically-important-banks-g-sibs/. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Financial Stability Board (2017a) About the FSB. http://www.fsb.org/about/. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Financial Stability Board (2017b) What we do. http://www.fsb.org/what-we-do/. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Financial Stability Oversight Council (2011) Study and recommendations regarding concentration limits on large financial companies, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Stability Oversight Council (2016) 2016 Annual report. https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fsoc/studies-reports/Pages/2016-Annual-Report.aspx. Accessed 14 June 2017

  • Floden M (2014) Did household debt matter in the great recession? 16 February. Supplement to Blog Post on ekonomistas.se. http://martinfloden.net/files/hhdebt_supplement_2014.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Goldcare (2016) Global financial crisis coming – Japan warns of ‘Lehman-Scale’ crisis at G7. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-30/global-financial-crisis-coming-%E2%80%93-japan-warns-%E2%80%9Clehman-scale%E2%80%9D-crisis-g7. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Gourinchas P, Obstfeld M (2012) Stories of the twentieth century for the twenty-first. Am Econ J Macroecon 4:226–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RH (2015) The regulation of shadow banking in China: international and comparative perspectives. Bank Finance Law Rev 30:481

    Google Scholar 

  • Igan D, Loungaini P (2012) Global housing cycles. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 12/217

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2008) Global financial stability report financial stress and deleveraging macrofinancial implications and policy, October

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2011) Staff discussion note. Crisis management and resolution: early lessons from the financial crisis, March

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2012) IMF Staff discussion note, December, Shadow banking: economics and policy

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2016) Global financial stability report: potent policies for a successful normalization

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund Financial Stability Board and Bank for International Settlements (2016) IMF-FSB-BIS elements of effective macroprudential polices lessons from international experience

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Forum-Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, The (2015) Developments in credit risk management across sectors: current practices and recommendations, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Forum-Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International Organization of Securities Commissions, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, The (2010) Review of the differentiated nature and scope of financial regulation: key issues and recommendations, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe B, Pfleiderer A (2013) Basel III: what it means for the global banking system. Bank Finance Law Rev 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly R (2011) The good, the bad, the impaired: a credit risk model of the irish mortgage market. Central Bank of Ireland Technical Paper 13/RT/11

    Google Scholar 

  • King M (2016) The end of alchemy: money, banking and the future of the global economy. Little Brown Book Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • King M, Low D (2014) Measuring the ‘world’ real interest rate. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 19887

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodres L, Pritsker M (2002) A rational expectations model of financial contagion. J Finance 57(2):769–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kragh-Sorenson K, Solheim H (2014) What do banks lose money on during crises? Norges Bank Staff Memo No. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde C (2014) Economic inclusion and financial integrity. 27 May speech at conference on inclusive capitalism

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Minne G (2014) Learning from financial crises. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6838

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim G et al (2015) Macroprudential policy: what instruments and how to use them? lessons from country experiences. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No 11/238

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2015) Shadow banking in China. Bank Finance Law Rev 30:127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian T (2012) Beyond macro-prudential regulation: three ways of thinking about financial crisis, regulation and reform. J Glob Policy 3:410–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay H (2016) Does China have too much debt? http://www.bhpbilliton.com/investors/prospects/does-china-have-too-much-debt. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Mian A, Sufi A (2009) The consequences of mortgage credit expansion: evidence from the US mortgage default crisis. Q J Econ 124:1449–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milan A, Sufi A (2016) Household debt and business cycles worldwide. University of Chicago Booth School of Business and Princeton University Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan A (August 2009) Tax ‘socially useless’ banks, says FSA Chief Lord Turner. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6097420/Tax-socially-useless-banks-says-FSA-chief-Lord-Turner.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • North G (2015) Regulation governing the provision of credit assistance & financial advice in Australia: a consumer’s perspective. Federal Law Rev 43:369–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North G, Buckley RP (2012) A financial transactions tax: inefficient or needed systemic reform? Georgetown J Int Law 43:745

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa K, Wan J (2007) Household debt and consumption: a quantitative analysis based on household micro data for Japan. J Hous Econ 16:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014) Focus on top incomes and taxation in OECD Countries: was the crisis a game changer?

    Google Scholar 

  • Peihani M (2014) Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs): an analysis of current regulatory developments. Bank Finance Law Rev 29:129

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillippon T (2015) Has the US finance industry become less efficient? on the theory and measurement of financial intermediation. Am Econ Rev 105:1408–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2009) This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand (July 2016) Bulletin: 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin N, Summers L (2016) Have big banks gotten safer? 15 September Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Conference Draft

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinasi G (2004) Defining financial stability. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 04/187

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarcz S (2016) Shadow banking and regulation in China and other developing countries. 16 September Duke University Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D (2016) The man who cleaned up during the GFC reckons another financial crisis is on the way, 4 February. http://businessinsider.com.au. Accessed 26 June 2017

  • Tankersley J (2014) A black hole for our best and brightest. 16 December. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2014/12/16/a-black-hole-for-our-best-and-brightest/. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  • Turner A (2009) 22 September, Address at the City Banquet. The Mansion House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker GA (2014) Financial crisis and financial resolution. Bank Finance Law Rev 29:55

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2017) Insight report: the global risks report

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin D, Stanislaw J (2002) The commanding heights. Touchstone Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Wu W (2016) China’s shadow bank lending balloons to 58Trn Yuan, as focus shifts to risks from fintech platforms. South China Morning Post. http://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/2040664/chinas-shadow-bank-lending-balloons-58trn-yuan-focus-shifts. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gill North .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

North, G. (2018). Well Governed, Sustainable and Socially Responsible Financial Corporations: Remote or Real Expectations?. In: du Plessis, J., Varottil, U., Veldman, J. (eds) Globalisation of Corporate Social Responsibility and its Impact on Corporate Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69128-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69128-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69127-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69128-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics