Abstract
This chapter aims to analyze the role of legitimacy in mediating the people management-society relationship. Emphasis is on how the historically changing theorizations of people management reflect different institutional and historical contexts, legitimating notions of how to position people management and expectations of the role it ought to play. Also, emphasis is on specific types of blindness preventing long-term sustainability and legitimacy of HRM.
The chapter is based on a legitimacy-as-process perspective claiming theorization as a critical element of legitimation. The theorization of the field of people management (of which HRM is a specific variation) is analyzed based on literature representing highly influential authorships and major knowledge institutions often cited in the literature influencing the field of people management and on secondary literature such as review articles.
A brief historical analysis of the changing core of the people management/HRM ontology, epistemology, and its legitimating notations is performed, and four types of emergent HRM epistemologies and corresponding notions of legitimacy are identified based on the fragmented future HRM landscape.
The findings and practical consequences are that although the perspective of HRM is broadened, blind spots unavoidably generate paradoxes and an ever-existing “crisis” of the HRM project, which must be accepted as a precondition for the profession but also for its adaptation toward current challenges.
The chapter adds to legitimacy and HRM literature by providing an understanding of why the legitimacy-as-property and legitimacy-as-perception perspectives must be subordinated to the legitimacy-as-process perspective and how this appears in the case of HRM.
References
Ackers P (2014) Rethinking the employment relationship: a neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy. Int J Hum Resour Manag 25(18):2608–2625
Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) (2011) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Mills DQ, Walton RE (1984) Chapter 2, a conceptual view of HRM. In: Managing human assets. Free Press, New York
Boselie P, Brewster C (2015) Strategic human resource management: a wrong turn for HRM research? In: Örtenblad A (ed) Handbook of research on managerial panaceas: adaptation and context. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 130–148
Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2011) The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge Press, Cambridge
Bowen DE, Ostroff C (2004) Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of “strength” of the HRM system. Acad Manag Rev 29:203–221
Boxall PF, Purcell J, Wright P (2007) The goals of HRM. In: Boxall P, Purcell J, Wright P (eds) Oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Boxall PF, Purcell J, Wright P (2010) Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, New York
Brewster C, Walker JT, Woody G (2014) Diversity between and within varieties of capitalism: transnational survey evidence. Ind Corp Chang 23(2):493–533
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2012) Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. In: SpringerBriefs in business, vol 7. Springer, New York
Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DFJ (2012) The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep 1(2):2
Carpenter MJ, Charon LCd (2014) Mitigating multigenerational conflict and attracting, motivating, and retaining millennial employees by changing the organizational culture: a theoretical model. J Psychol Issues Org Cult 5(3):68–84
CIPD (2018) Our history. On [https://www.cipd.co.uk/about/who-we-are/history]. Accessed 10 June 2018
Clarke J, Newman J (1997) The managerial state. Sage, London
Cleveland JN, Byrne ZN, Cavanagh TM (2015) The future of HR is RH: respect for humanity at work. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):146–161
Colbert B (2004) The complex resource-based view: implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Acad Manag Rev 29(3):341–358
Cradden C (2011) Unitarism, pluralism, radicalism… and the rest? Université De Genève 36(8):1–22
Deephouse D (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strateg Manag J 20(2):147
Delery JE, Doty DH (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manag J 39:802–835
Dürbeck G, Schaumann C, Sullivan H (2015) Human and non-human agencies in the Anthropocene. Ecozon@ 6(1):118–136
Ehnert I (2009) Sustainable human resource management: a conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Physica-Verlag, Berlin
Ehnert I, Harry W (2012) Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: introduction to the special issue. Manag Rev 23(3):221–238
Ekbia H, Mattioli M, Kouper I, Arave G, Ghazinejad A, Bowman T, Suri VR, Tsou A, Weingart S, Sugimoto CR (2015) Big data, bigger dilemmas: a critical review. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66:1523–1545
Evans W (2015) Posthuman rights: dimensions of Transhuman worlds. Revista Teknokultura 12(2):373–384
Fayol H (1916) Administration industrielle et generale. Dunod, Paris
Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Floridi L (2014) The fourth revolution – how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Fombrun CJ, Tichy MM, Devanna MA (1984) Strategic human resource management. Wiley, New York
Fournier V (1998) Stories of development and exploitation: militant voices in an enterprise culture. Organization 5(1):55–80
Fox A (1966) Managerial ideology and labour relations. Br J Ind Relat 4(1–3):366–378
Fox A (1974) Beyond contract: work, power and trust relations. Faber & Faber, London
Gillespie T (2014) Algorithm [draft] [#digitalkeyword]. Culture digitally. Retrieved 1 Apr 2018, from http://culturedigitally.org/2014/06/algorithm-draft-digitalkeyword/
Gonzalez-Diaz E (2010) Paradox, Time, and De-Paradoxication in Luhmann: No Easy Way Out. World Futures 60(1–2):15–27
Guest D (1987) Human resource management and industrial relations. J Manag Stud 24:503–521
Guest D (1990) Human resource management and the American dream. J Manag Stud 27(4):378–397
Guest D (2011) Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Hum Resour Manag J 21(1):3–13
Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Holmström S (2004) The reflective paradigm. In: van Ruler B, Veris D (eds) Public relations in Europe. de Gruyter, Berling, pp 121–134
Holmström S (2005) Reframing public relations: the evolution of a reflective paradigm for organizational legitimization. Public Relat Rev 31(4):497–504
Jackson S, Seo J (2010) The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organ Manag J 7(4):278–290
Janssens M, Steyaert C (2009) HRM and performance: a plea for reflexivity in HRM studies. J Manag Stud 46:143–155
Kaivo-oja J, Santonen T (2016) Futures of innovation systems and innovation management: open innovation paradigm analysed from futures perspectives, chapter 6. In: Mention A-L, Torkkeli M (eds) Open innovation: a multifaceted perspective, (in 2 parts), vol 2. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
Kaufman BE (2014) The historical development of American HRM broadly viewed. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):196–218
Keegan A, Boselie P (2006) The lack of impact of dissensus inspired analysis on developments in the field of human resource management. J Manag Stud 43(7):1491–1511
Keenoy T (1990) Human resource management: rhetoric, reality and contradiction. Int J Hum Resour Manag 1(3):363–384
Keenoy T (1997) HRMism and the languages of re-presentation. J Manag Stud 34:825–841
Keenoy T (1999) HRM as hologram: a polemic. J Manag Stud 36(1):1–23
Keenoy T, Delbridge R (2010) Beyond managerialism? Int J Hum Resour Manag 21(4/6):799–817
Kelley T, Kelley D (2013) Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Business, New York
Kelman HC, Hamilton V (1989) Crimes of obedience: toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. Yale University Press, New Haven
Kitchin R (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Inf Commun Soc 20(1):14–29
Klijn E (2005) Designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. Eur Polit Sci 4:328–339
Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM (2012) Governance network theory: past, present, and future. Policy Polit 40(4):187–206. Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 231–251
Kochan TA (2004, first published 2013) Restoring trust in the human resource management profession. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 42:132–146
Kramar R (2014) Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int J Hum Resour Manag 25(8):1069–1089
Legge K (1989) Human resource management: a critical analysis. In: Storey J (ed) New perspectives on human resource management. Routledge, London
Legge K (1995) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Legge K (2005) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities, anniversary edition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
León DS d, LaVelle K, Cantrell SM (2013) Trends reshaping the future of HR. Tapping skills anywhere, anytime. Accenture. Institute for High Performance, Philadelphia
Lucio MMn, Stuart M (2004) Swimming against the tide: social partnership, mutual gains and the revival of ‘tired’ HRM. Int J Hum Resour Manag 15(2):410–424
Luhmann N (1993) Risk, a sociological theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrialized civilization. Macmillan Co, New York
Paauwe J (2009) HRM and performance: achievements, methodological issues and prospects. J Manag Stud 46(1):129–142
Persky J (1995) Retrospectives: the ethology of homo economicus. J Econ Perspect 9(2):221–231
Rasch W (2000) Niklas Luhmann’s modernity: the paradoxes of differentiation. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Rhodes C, Harvey G (2012) Agonism and the possibilities of ethics for HRM. J Bus Ethics 111:49–59
Richardson R, Thompson M (1999) The impact of people management practices on business performance: a literature review. Institute of Personnel and Development, London
Rylander A (2009) Design thinking as knowledge work: epistemological foundations and practical implications. Des Manag J 4(1):7–19
Sappey J, Sappey R, Burgess J (2014) New directions in industrial relations research? Employ Relat Rec 14(2):4–23
Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Sears L (2010) Next generation HR. Time for change – towards a next generation for HR. CIPD, London
Sears L (2011) Next Generation HR. Insight driven, CIPD, London
Sheliazhenko Y (2017) Artificial personal autonomy and concept of robot rights. Eur J Law Polit Sci. Retrieved 2 Apr 2018: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/artificial-personal-autonomy-and-concept-of-robot-rights
Sørensen E, Torfing J (eds) (2007) Theories of democratic network governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Spencer-Brown G (1969) Laws of Form, fifth, intern. ed. 2008, Bohmeier, Leipzig
Stone DL, Deadrick DL (eds) (2014) HRM past, present and future. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):193–282
Stone DL, Deadrick DL (eds) (2015) HRM past, present and future. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):139–232
Stone DL, Deadrick DL, Lukaszewski KM, Johnson R (2015) The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):216–231
Storey J (1989) From personnel management to human resource management. In: Storey J (ed) New perspectives on human resource management. Routledge, London
Storey J (1995) Human resource management: still marching on or marching out? In: Storey J (ed) Human resource management: a critical text. Routledge, London
Strang D, Meyer J (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc 22(4):487–511
Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610
Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm Sci Q 50(1):35–67
Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P (2017) Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals 11(1):451–478
Taylor FW (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Row, New York
Teubner G (2002) Hybrid laws: constitutionalizing private governance networks. In: Robert Kagan R, Winston K (eds) Legality and community. Berkeley Public Policy Press, Berkeley, pp 311–331
Torfing J, Triantafillou P (eds) (2011) Interactive policymaking, metagovernance, and democracy. ECPR Press, Colchester
Townley B (1990) Foucault, power/knowledge and its relevance for HRM. Manag Res News 13(6):23–23
Truss C, Gratton L, Hope-Hailey V, McGovern P, Stiles P (1997) Soft and hard models of human resource management: a reappraisal. J Manag Stud 34(1):53–73
Ulrich D, Dulebohn JH (2015) Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):188–204
Ulrich D, Younger J, Brockbank W, Ulrich M (2012) HR from the outside in: the next era of human resources transformation. McGraw-Hill, New York
Veruggio G (2007) The EURON roboethics roadmap. HUMANOID 06: 612. Retrieved 2 Apr 2018: http://www.roboethics.org/atelier2006/docs/ROBOETHICS%20ROADMAP%20Rel2.1.1.pdf
Weber M (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen
Weber M (1947) Legitimate authority and bureaucracy. In: The theory of social and economic organisation. The Free Press, New York, pp 328–340
Wright PM (1998) Strategy-HR fit: does it really matter? Hum Resour Plan 21(4):56–57
Wright PM, McMahan GC (1992) Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. J Manag 18(2):295
Wright PM, McMahan GC (2011) Exploring human capital: putting “human” back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal 21(2): 93–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Neisig, M. (2019). Human Resource Management and Business Legitimacy: Changing Roles and Legitimacy-as-Process. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_6-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_6-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities