Skip to main content

Human Resource Management and Business Legitimacy: Changing Roles and Legitimacy-as-Process

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy
  • 285 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to analyze the role of legitimacy in mediating the people management-society relationship. Emphasis is on how the historically changing theorizations of people management reflect different institutional and historical contexts, legitimating notions of how to position people management and expectations of the role it ought to play. Also, emphasis is on specific types of blindness preventing long-term sustainability and legitimacy of HRM.

The chapter is based on a legitimacy-as-process perspective claiming theorization as a critical element of legitimation. The theorization of the field of people management (of which HRM is a specific variation) is analyzed based on literature representing highly influential authorships and major knowledge institutions often cited in the literature influencing the field of people management and on secondary literature such as review articles.

A brief historical analysis of the changing core of the people management/HRM ontology, epistemology, and its legitimating notations is performed, and four types of emergent HRM epistemologies and corresponding notions of legitimacy are identified based on the fragmented future HRM landscape.

The findings and practical consequences are that although the perspective of HRM is broadened, blind spots unavoidably generate paradoxes and an ever-existing “crisis” of the HRM project, which must be accepted as a precondition for the profession but also for its adaptation toward current challenges.

The chapter adds to legitimacy and HRM literature by providing an understanding of why the legitimacy-as-property and legitimacy-as-perception perspectives must be subordinated to the legitimacy-as-process perspective and how this appears in the case of HRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackers P (2014) Rethinking the employment relationship: a neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy. Int J Hum Resour Manag 25(18):2608–2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) (2011) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer M, Spector B, Lawrence PR, Mills DQ, Walton RE (1984) Chapter 2, a conceptual view of HRM. In: Managing human assets. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boselie P, Brewster C (2015) Strategic human resource management: a wrong turn for HRM research? In: Örtenblad A (ed) Handbook of research on managerial panaceas: adaptation and context. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 130–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2011) The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence. Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen DE, Ostroff C (2004) Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of “strength” of the HRM system. Acad Manag Rev 29:203–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall PF, Purcell J, Wright P (2007) The goals of HRM. In: Boxall P, Purcell J, Wright P (eds) Oxford handbook of human resource management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall PF, Purcell J, Wright P (2010) Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster C, Walker JT, Woody G (2014) Diversity between and within varieties of capitalism: transnational survey evidence. Ind Corp Chang 23(2):493–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2012) Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. In: SpringerBriefs in business, vol 7. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis EG, Barth TD, Campbell DFJ (2012) The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep 1(2):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter MJ, Charon LCd (2014) Mitigating multigenerational conflict and attracting, motivating, and retaining millennial employees by changing the organizational culture: a theoretical model. J Psychol Issues Org Cult 5(3):68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIPD (2018) Our history. On [https://www.cipd.co.uk/about/who-we-are/history]. Accessed 10 June 2018

  • Clarke J, Newman J (1997) The managerial state. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland JN, Byrne ZN, Cavanagh TM (2015) The future of HR is RH: respect for humanity at work. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):146–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert B (2004) The complex resource-based view: implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management. Acad Manag Rev 29(3):341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cradden C (2011) Unitarism, pluralism, radicalism… and the rest? Université De Genève 36(8):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse D (1999) To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strateg Manag J 20(2):147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery JE, Doty DH (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: test of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manag J 39:802–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürbeck G, Schaumann C, Sullivan H (2015) Human and non-human agencies in the Anthropocene. Ecozon@ 6(1):118–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert I (2009) Sustainable human resource management: a conceptual and exploratory analysis from a paradox perspective. Physica-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehnert I, Harry W (2012) Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: introduction to the special issue. Manag Rev 23(3):221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia H, Mattioli M, Kouper I, Arave G, Ghazinejad A, Bowman T, Suri VR, Tsou A, Weingart S, Sugimoto CR (2015) Big data, bigger dilemmas: a critical review. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 66:1523–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans W (2015) Posthuman rights: dimensions of Transhuman worlds. Revista Teknokultura 12(2):373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol H (1916) Administration industrielle et generale. Dunod, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2014) The fourth revolution – how the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ, Tichy MM, Devanna MA (1984) Strategic human resource management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier V (1998) Stories of development and exploitation: militant voices in an enterprise culture. Organization 5(1):55–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox A (1966) Managerial ideology and labour relations. Br J Ind Relat 4(1–3):366–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox A (1974) Beyond contract: work, power and trust relations. Faber & Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie T (2014) Algorithm [draft] [#digitalkeyword]. Culture digitally. Retrieved 1 Apr 2018, from http://culturedigitally.org/2014/06/algorithm-draft-digitalkeyword/

  • Gonzalez-Diaz E (2010) Paradox, Time, and De-Paradoxication in Luhmann: No Easy Way Out. World Futures 60(1–2):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest D (1987) Human resource management and industrial relations. J Manag Stud 24:503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest D (1990) Human resource management and the American dream. J Manag Stud 27(4):378–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest D (2011) Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers. Hum Resour Manag J 21(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström S (2004) The reflective paradigm. In: van Ruler B, Veris D (eds) Public relations in Europe. de Gruyter, Berling, pp 121–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström S (2005) Reframing public relations: the evolution of a reflective paradigm for organizational legitimization. Public Relat Rev 31(4):497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Seo J (2010) The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organ Manag J 7(4):278–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens M, Steyaert C (2009) HRM and performance: a plea for reflexivity in HRM studies. J Manag Stud 46:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-oja J, Santonen T (2016) Futures of innovation systems and innovation management: open innovation paradigm analysed from futures perspectives, chapter 6. In: Mention A-L, Torkkeli M (eds) Open innovation: a multifaceted perspective, (in 2 parts), vol 2. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman BE (2014) The historical development of American HRM broadly viewed. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):196–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan A, Boselie P (2006) The lack of impact of dissensus inspired analysis on developments in the field of human resource management. J Manag Stud 43(7):1491–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy T (1990) Human resource management: rhetoric, reality and contradiction. Int J Hum Resour Manag 1(3):363–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy T (1997) HRMism and the languages of re-presentation. J Manag Stud 34:825–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy T (1999) HRM as hologram: a polemic. J Manag Stud 36(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy T, Delbridge R (2010) Beyond managerialism? Int J Hum Resour Manag 21(4/6):799–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley T, Kelley D (2013) Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman HC, Hamilton V (1989) Crimes of obedience: toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2017) Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Inf Commun Soc 20(1):14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn E (2005) Designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. Eur Polit Sci 4:328–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn EH, Koppenjan JFM (2012) Governance network theory: past, present, and future. Policy Polit 40(4):187–206. Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 231–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan TA (2004, first published 2013) Restoring trust in the human resource management profession. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 42:132–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramar R (2014) Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int J Hum Resour Manag 25(8):1069–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge K (1989) Human resource management: a critical analysis. In: Storey J (ed) New perspectives on human resource management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge K (1995) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Legge K (2005) Human resource management: rhetorics and realities, anniversary edition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • León DS d, LaVelle K, Cantrell SM (2013) Trends reshaping the future of HR. Tapping skills anywhere, anytime. Accenture. Institute for High Performance, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucio MMn, Stuart M (2004) Swimming against the tide: social partnership, mutual gains and the revival of ‘tired’ HRM. Int J Hum Resour Manag 15(2):410–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1993) Risk, a sociological theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrialized civilization. Macmillan Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe J (2009) HRM and performance: achievements, methodological issues and prospects. J Manag Stud 46(1):129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persky J (1995) Retrospectives: the ethology of homo economicus. J Econ Perspect 9(2):221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasch W (2000) Niklas Luhmann’s modernity: the paradoxes of differentiation. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes C, Harvey G (2012) Agonism and the possibilities of ethics for HRM. J Bus Ethics 111:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson R, Thompson M (1999) The impact of people management practices on business performance: a literature review. Institute of Personnel and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylander A (2009) Design thinking as knowledge work: epistemological foundations and practical implications. Des Manag J 4(1):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappey J, Sappey R, Burgess J (2014) New directions in industrial relations research? Employ Relat Rec 14(2):4–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears L (2010) Next generation HR. Time for change – towards a next generation for HR. CIPD, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears L (2011) Next Generation HR. Insight driven, CIPD, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheliazhenko Y (2017) Artificial personal autonomy and concept of robot rights. Eur J Law Polit Sci. Retrieved 2 Apr 2018: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/artificial-personal-autonomy-and-concept-of-robot-rights

  • Sørensen E, Torfing J (eds) (2007) Theories of democratic network governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Brown G (1969) Laws of Form, fifth, intern. ed. 2008, Bohmeier, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone DL, Deadrick DL (eds) (2014) HRM past, present and future. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):193–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone DL, Deadrick DL (eds) (2015) HRM past, present and future. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):139–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone DL, Deadrick DL, Lukaszewski KM, Johnson R (2015) The influence of technology on the future of human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):216–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey J (1989) From personnel management to human resource management. In: Storey J (ed) New perspectives on human resource management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey J (1995) Human resource management: still marching on or marching out? In: Storey J (ed) Human resource management: a critical text. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang D, Meyer J (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory Soc 22(4):487–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm Sci Q 50(1):35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R, Bitektine A, Haack P (2017) Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals 11(1):451–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor FW (1911) The principles of scientific management. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner G (2002) Hybrid laws: constitutionalizing private governance networks. In: Robert Kagan R, Winston K (eds) Legality and community. Berkeley Public Policy Press, Berkeley, pp 311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Triantafillou P (eds) (2011) Interactive policymaking, metagovernance, and democracy. ECPR Press, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley B (1990) Foucault, power/knowledge and its relevance for HRM. Manag Res News 13(6):23–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truss C, Gratton L, Hope-Hailey V, McGovern P, Stiles P (1997) Soft and hard models of human resource management: a reappraisal. J Manag Stud 34(1):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich D, Dulebohn JH (2015) Are we there yet? What’s next for HR? Hum Resour Manag Rev 25(2):188–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich D, Younger J, Brockbank W, Ulrich M (2012) HR from the outside in: the next era of human resources transformation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Veruggio G (2007) The EURON roboethics roadmap. HUMANOID 06: 612. Retrieved 2 Apr 2018: http://www.roboethics.org/atelier2006/docs/ROBOETHICS%20ROADMAP%20Rel2.1.1.pdf

  • Weber M (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Mohr-Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1947) Legitimate authority and bureaucracy. In: The theory of social and economic organisation. The Free Press, New York, pp 328–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM (1998) Strategy-HR fit: does it really matter? Hum Resour Plan 21(4):56–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM, McMahan GC (1992) Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. J Manag 18(2):295

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM, McMahan GC (2011) Exploring human capital: putting “human” back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal 21(2): 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margit Neisig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Neisig, M. (2019). Human Resource Management and Business Legitimacy: Changing Roles and Legitimacy-as-Process. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics