Skip to main content

Theology, Responsibility, and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy
  • 246 Accesses

Abstract

We seem to know what business is, but what does “theology in business” mean? In this paper, I want to show how our contemporary understanding of “business legitimacy” can be translated to the theological concept of “love of your neighbor” which means responsibility toward other human beings. Only if you act responsibly and accountable in your relationships, including economic relationships, are you legitimate in your acts. Responsibility and accountability is a web of relationships. This paper focuses on how responsibility has been interpreted in Protestantism, particularly with regard to the reformed theologian’s, Martin Luther, understanding of responsibility in economy. With the rising capitalism of the Renaissance, new politics was asked for, and intellectual discussions on fairness and justice were part of that. Further, I want to show how this theological understanding of business legitimacy as responsibility is both (1) an invisible underpinning of contemporary business legitimacy and (2) a concept of justice which seems to have disappeared from contemporary, neoliberal debates around economy and business legitimacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquinas T (2016) By Benedikt Koehler: the thirteenth-century economics of Thomas Aquinas. Econ Aff 36(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin W (1977) Illuminationen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmona S, Ezzamel M (2007) Accounting and accountability in ancient civilizations: Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. Account Audit Account J 20(2):177–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710740993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CumExFiles (2018). https://cumex-files.com/

  • Dunn C, Burton BK (2006) Friedman's “the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”: a critique for the classroom. Proc Int Assoc Bus Soc 17:292–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 13(32–33):122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Glebe-Møller J (1982) Politisk Teologi. FK-tryk

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1973) Die Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington B (2016) Capital without borders. Wealth management and the one percent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joas H (2017) Die Macht des Heiligen – Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas H (1984) The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (2007) Globalization, chapter 7. In: Jones G, Zeitlin J (eds) The Oxford handbook of business history. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneer M, Bourgeois-Gironde S (2017) Mens Rea ascription, expertise and outcome effects: professional judges surveyed. Cognition 169:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N, Habermas J (1976) Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1977) Funktion der Religion. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1992) Beobachtungen der Moderne. Westdeutscher Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther M (2016) On worldly authority – to what extent it should be obeyed paperback, 17 April 2016. (Von weltlicher Obrigkeit, wie weit man ihr Gehorsam schuldig sei (1523). Clocktower Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Luther M (2015) On commerce and usury (1524) (Economic Ideas that Built Europe). Von Kauffshandlung vnd Wucher (On Commerce and Usury, 1524). Edited by Philipp Robinson Rössner. Anthem Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin F (2014) Money. The unauthorized biography. Alfred A. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K, Engels F (2012) Das Kapital – capital: critique of political economy, vol vol 1. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 13 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Netterstrøm JB (2007) Feud in medieval and early modern Europe. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  • Panama Papers. http://yourpublicvalue.org/public-value-and-business-legitimacy/

  • Rendtorff JD (ed) (2016a) Power and principle in the marketplace. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2016b) Responsibility as the foundations of ethics. Published in Revista do Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Direito da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2018) The concept of business legitimacy: corporate social responsibility, corporate citizenship, corporate governance as essential elements of ethical business legitimacy

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössner PR (2017a) Martin Luther and economic life. In: Oxford research encyclopedias. http://religion.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-376?mediaType=Article

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössner PR (2017b) Conference paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt C (2005) Political theology. Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. George Schwab (Translator)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling H (2017) Martin Luther. Rebel in an age of upheaval. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sløk C (2009) Disorganization as religion: organization in the Danish evangelical Lutheran National Church. Cybern Hum Know 16(1–2):51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sløk C (2006) Niklas Luhmann's ambiguity towards religion. Soziale Systeme 11(2):327–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Stausholm S, Murphy R (2017) The big four: a study of opacity. http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Documents/GUENGLBigFourWeb.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz G (2015) The richest man who ever lived – the life and times of Jacob Fugger. Simon and Schuster Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610, s. 574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (2002) The protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism: and other writings penguin twentieth-century classics. Paperback – 30 April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott H (1996) Thinking accountability: accounting for the disciplined production of self. In: Munro R, Mouritsen J (eds) Accountability: power, ethos and the technologies of managing. International Thompson Business Press, London, pp 23–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Sløk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sløk, C. (2019). Theology, Responsibility, and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_47-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_47-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics