Skip to main content

Human-in-the-Loop Thermal Management for Smart Buildings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligent Building Control Systems

Part of the book series: Advances in Industrial Control ((AIC))

  • 1931 Accesses

Abstract

While the primary purpose of most buildings is to provide a safe and comfortable environment for its occupants, most of the current studies and solutions developed for building thermal control have been designed independent of the occupant feedback. An acceptable temperature range for the occupancy level is estimated, and control input is designed to maintain temperature within that range during occupancy hours. Consider office floors, conference rooms, student dorms, homes, and other multi-occupant spaces where temperature is chosen irrespective of the number of occupants and their individual preferences. This existing approach is not only non- user-centric but also suboptimal from both energy consumption and occupant satisfaction/productivity perspectives. It is thus highly desirable for such multi-occupant spaces to have a mechanism that would take into account each occupant’s individual comfort preference and the energy cost, to come up with optimal thermal setting. Individual occupant’s feedback and preference can be obtained through wearable sensors or smart phone applications. In this chapter, we propose algorithms that take into account each occupant’s preferences along with the thermal correlations between different zones in a building, to arrive at optimal thermal settings for all zones of the building in a coordinated manner. First, we present a control algorithm that uses binary occupant feedback based on singular perturbation theory to minimize aggregate user discomfort and total energy cost. A consensus algorithm for attaining a common temperature setpoint in a typical multi-occupant space is presented next that uses Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to solve the consensus problem. We use our Watervliet, NY-based test facility to demonstrate the performance of our algorithms.

Parts of the work in this chapter have been extracted from [1] (©[2015] IEEE. Reprinted, with permission, from S.K. Gupta, K. Kar, S. Mishra, J.T. Wen, “Collaborative energy and thermal comfort management through distributed consensus algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Automation Science and Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1285–1296, Oct. 2015.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta SK, Kar K, Mishra S, Wen JT (2015) Collaborative energy and thermal comfort management through distributed consensus algorithms. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 12(4):1285–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo W, Zhou M (2009) Technologies toward thermal comfort-based and energy efficient HVAC systems: A review. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, Oct. 2009. San Antonio, TX

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karjalainen S, Koistinen O (2007) User problems with individual temperature control in offices. Build Environ 42(8):2880–2887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Times union (2016). http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/This-cold-war-too-has-roots-in-the-past-6422917.php/. Accessed Mar 21 2016

  5. Ma Y, Anderson G, Borrelli E (2011) A distributed predictive control approach to building temperature regulation. In: Proceedings of the american control conference, San Francisco, CA, Jun–Jul 2011

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erickson VL, Cerpa AE (2012) Thermovote: Participatory sensing for efficient building hvac conditioning. In: BuildSys 2012 Proc. Fourth ACM Workshop on embedded sensing systems for energy efficiency in buildings, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. Home nest (2016). http://www.nest.com. Accessed 21 Mar 2016

  8. Hoff JV (2008) Forty years of fanger’s model of thermal comfort: Comfort for all? Indoor Air 18(3):182–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphreys MA, Hancock M (2007) Do people like to feel neutral?: Exploring the variation of the desired thermal sensation on the ASHRAE scale. Energy Build 39(7):867–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McIntyre DA (1982) Chamber studies reductio ad absurdum? Energy Build 5(2):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ASHRAE (2004) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy, ASHRAE Standard 55-2004, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolokotsa D, Niachou K, Geros V, Kalaitzakis K, Stavrakakis GS, Santamouris M (2005) Implementation of an integrated indoor environment and energy management system. Energy Build 37(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dalamagkidis K, Kolokotsa D, Kalaitzakis K, Stavrakakis GS (2007) Reinforcement learning for energy conservation and comfort in buildings. Building Environ 42(7):2686–2698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bermejo P, Redondo L, Ossa L, Puerta JM (2012) Design and simulation of a thermal comfort adaptive system based on fuzzy logic and online learning. Energy Build 49(6):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tse WL, Chan WL (2008) A distributed sensor network for measurement of human thermal comfort feelings. Sens Actuators A: Phys 144(2):394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang J, Kim Y, Kim H, Jeong J, Park S (1997) Comfort sensing system for indoor environment. In: International conference on solid state sensors and actuators, Chicago, IL, Jun 1997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guillemin A, Morel N (2002) Experimental results of a self-adaptive integrated control system in buildings: a pilot study. Sol Energy 72(5):397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murakamia Y, Terano M, Mizutani K, Harada M, Kuno S (2007) Field experiments on energy consumption and thermal comfort in the office environment controlled by occupants requirements from PC terminal. Build Environ 42(12):4022–4027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Daum D, Haldi F, Morel N (2011) A personalized measure of thermal comfort for building controls. Build Environ 46(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Purdon S, Kusy B, Jurdak R, Challen G (2013) Model-free HVAC control using occupant feedback. In: IEEE 38th Conference on LCN workshops, Sydney, NSW, Oct 2013

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao QC, Cheng Z, Wang F, Jiang Y, Ding J (2014) Experimental study of group thermal comfort model. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering, Taipei, Aug 2014

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao QC, Zhao Y, Wang F, Jiang Y, Jiang Y, Zhang F (2014) Preliminary study of learning individual thermal complaint behavior using one-class classifier for indoor environment control. Build Environ 72(2):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jazizadeh F, Ghahramani A, Becerik-Gerber B, Kichkaylo BT, Orosz M (2014) User-led decentralized thermal comfort driven HVAC operations for improved efficiency in office buildings. Energy Build 70(2):398–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao J, Lam KP, Ydstie BE, Loftness V (2016) Occupant-oriented mixed-mode energy - plus predictive control simulation. Energy Build 117(4):362–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sustainable buildings technology laboratories (Living Labs): Center for high performance buildings. https://engineering.purdue.edu/CHPB/Facilities/LivingLab. Last Accessed 21 Mar 2016

  27. Choi J, Loftness V, Lee D (2012) Investigation of the possibility of the use of heart rate as a human factor for thermal sensation models. Build Environ 50(4):165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gagge AP, Nishi Y (1971) An effective temperature scale based on a simple model of human physiological regulatory response. ASHRAE Trans 77:247–262

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stolwijk JAJ (1980) Mathematical model of thermo regulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 355:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang H, Arens E, Huizeng C, Han T (2010) Thermal sensation and comfort models for non-uniform and transient environments, part III: Whole body sensation and comfort. Build Environ 45(2):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Raja IA (2007) Field studies of thermal comfort and the progress of the adaptive model. Adv Build Energy Res 1(1):55–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dear RJd, Brager GS (1998) Towards an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans 104(1):145–167

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mebee B (2011) Computational approaches to improving room heating and cooling for energy efficiency in buildings, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept Math, Virginia State and Polytech Inst

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riederer P, Marchiob D, Visier JC, Husaunndee A, Lahrech R (2002) Room thermal modeling adapted to the test of hvac control systems. Build Environ 37(8):777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyer H, Chabriat JP, Grondin-Perez B, Tourrand C, Brau J (1996) Thermal building simulation and computer generation of nodal models. Build Environ 31(3):207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fraisse G, Viardot C, Lafabrie O, Achard G (2002) Development of simplified and accurate building model based on electrical analogy. Energy Build 34(10):1017–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu B, Fu L, Di H (2008) Dynamic simulation of space heating systems with radiators controlled by TRVs in buildings. Energy Build 40(9):1755–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Athienitis AK (1985) Modeling and analysis of thermal networks through subnetworks for multi zone passive solar buildings. Appl Math Model 9(2):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ghiaus C (2013) Causality issue in the heat balance method for calculating the design heating and cooling load. Energy 50(1):292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chandan V (2010) Modeling and control of hydronic building HVAC systems, Master’s thesis, Dept Mech Eng, Univ Illinois Urbana-Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  41. Privara S, Siroky J, Ferkl L, Cigler J (2011) Model predictive control of a building heating system: The first experience. Energy Build 43(2):564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Khalil H (2002) Nonlinear Systems. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Kokotovic P, Khalil HK, O’Reilly J (1986) Singular perturbation methods in control. Analysis and design. Academic Press, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Gupta SK, Kar K, Mishra S, Wen J (2014) Building temperature control with active occupant feedback. In: Proceedings of the 19th IFAC world congress, Cape Town, South Africa, Aug. 2014

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bertsekas D, Tsitsiklis J (1989) Parallel and distributed computation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Sturzenegger D, Gyalistras D, Semeraro V, Morari M, Smith RS (2014) BRCM MATLAB toolbox: Model generation for model predictive cuilding control. In: Proceedings of the american control conference, Portland, OR, Jun 2014

    Google Scholar 

  47. Minakais M, Mishra S, Wen JT, Lagace L, Castiglia T (2015) Design and instrumentation of an intelligent building testbed. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering, Gothenberg, Sweden, Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award - 1230687.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh K. Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gupta, S.K., Kar, K. (2018). Human-in-the-Loop Thermal Management for Smart Buildings. In: Wen, J., Mishra, S. (eds) Intelligent Building Control Systems. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68462-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68462-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68461-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68462-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics