Skip to main content

The ‘Get Out of Jail Card’: The Immunity Risk Provides Financial Markets and Regulators from the Consequences of Their Mistakes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations
  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

Despite its history of triggering major mistakes, so much dubious financial risk management remains taken for granted and promoted by markets and regulators. As evermore sophisticated financial processes of operationalising and commodifying an indeterminate future subscribe to a false dichotomy between (quantitative) risk and (qualitative) uncertainty, this chapter problematises how this approach aggravates the asymmetric relationship between private, techno-scientific epistocracy and public democracy. Conventional risk management is analysed through the categories of market/systematic, operational/business and credit risk to reveal their distortions and mistakes. Notwithstanding its repetitious failures, the performativity of risk management/discourse creates and legitimises the conditions and subjectivities that validate its continued utility and normative authority. Immunising market entities from serious public contestation and reform, this depoliticises the constitution of authoritative knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Typically, ri sk is considered as a tangible, empirical phenomenon with probabilistic coordinates. Uncertainty, conversely, eludes quantitative capture and demands more subjective estimations and contingent information. Both are modes of framing the future as a problem of government.

  2. 2.

    Developed by anthropologist Gregory Bateson to define a self-amplifying process of divergence and conflict.

  3. 3.

    Beta is a measure of the volatility (systematic risk) of a security or portfolio relative to that of the market.

  4. 4.

    ‘Beating the market’ is nearly impossible over time.

  5. 5.

    As of January 2017.

  6. 6.

    As of January 2017.

  7. 7.

    Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can also be actively managed, margined or sold short.

  8. 8.

    The contention is that the past reproduces itself at regular intervals.

  9. 9.

    According to a March 2016 Ope rational Riskdata Exchange (ORX) benchmark exercise with a sample of 54 banks from Australia , Canada , Europe, South Africa and USA .

  10. 10.

    An options pricing formula that calculates theoretical pricing of put and call options.

  11. 11.

    In reference to physics, it explores stochastic processes in continuous time.

References

  • Aitken, Rob. 2007. Performing Capital: Toward a Cultural Economy of Popular and Global Finance. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Analytics, Moody’s. 2010. EDF Measures for Sovereigns. New York: Moody’s Analytics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2011a. Principles for the Sound Management of Operational Risk. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Operational Risk – Supervisory Guidelines for the Advanced Measurement Approaches. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Reducing Excessive Variability in Banks’ Regulatory Capital Ratios, A Report to the G20’. Basel: BIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank. 2013. Ideas and Policy Change. Governance 26 (2): 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Jacqueline. 2008. Ambiguity, Uncertainty and Risk: Rethinking Indeterminacy’. International Political Sociology 2 (4): 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The Limits of Financial Risk Management: Or, What We Didn’t Learn from the Asian Crisis. New Political Economy 15 (1): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. When Crises Are Failures: Contested Metrics in International Finance and Development. International Political Sociology 10 (1): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, Mark. 2013. Paradigms and Paradox: The Politics of Economic Ideas in Two Moments of Crisis. Governance 26 (2): 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2010. Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel, ed. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel, and John Law. 2003. On Qualculation, Agency and Otherness. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5): 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, Bruce. 2013. From Uncertainty toward Risk: The Case of Credit Ratings. Socio-Economic Review 11 (3): 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, Franck. 2008. Calculation, Qualculation, Calqulation. Marketing Theory 8 (1): 15–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 2004. Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework. New York: COSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Banking Federation. 2016. EBF Final Response to the BCBS Consultative Document on the Standardised Measurement Approach for Operational Risk. Brussels: EBF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch Ratings. 2012/2014. Sovereign Rating Criteria. New York: Fitch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. Two Lectures. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, ed. Colin Gordon, 78–108. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Norbert. 2014. What is the Value of Sovereign Ratings? German Economic Review 15 (1): 208–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, Andrew. 2009. The Spectre at the Feast. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gapen, Michael T., Dale F. Gray, Cheng Hoon Lim, and Yingbin Xiao. 2005. Measuring and Analyzing Sovereign Risk with Contingent Claims’. IMF Working Paper 05/155. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • deGoede, Marieke. 2004. Repoliticizing Financial Risk. Economy and Society 33 (2): 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Virtue, Fortune, and Faith: A Genealogy of Finance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, Andrew, Glen Hoggarth, and Victoria Saporta. 2000. Assessing Financial System Stability, Efficiency and Structure at the Bank of England, 1. BIS Papers: Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Colin. 2004. The Normalizing Role of Rationalist Assumptions in the Institutional Embedding of Neoliberalism. Economy and Society 33 (4): 500–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, Eric. 2014. The Status Quo Crisis: Global Financial Governance after the 2008 Meltdown. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2010. Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding, and Systemic Liquidity. Washington: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, Philippe. 1997. Value at Risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John M. 1921/1979. Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan, AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. 1921/1964. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: A.M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Alex Preda, eds. 2005. The Sociology of Financial Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, Greta. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, Paul. 2008. The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lépinay, Vincent-Antonin. 2011. Codes of Finance:Engineering Derivatives in a Global Bank. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald. 2003. Long-Term Capital Management and the Sociology of Arbitrage. Economy and Society 32 (3): 349–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Opening the Black Boxes of Global Finance. Review of International Political Economy 12 (5): 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Credit Crisis as a Problem in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 1778–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service. 2008. Rating Migration and Default Rates of Non-U.S. Sub-Sovereign Debt Issuers, 1983–2007. New York: MIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morningstar. 2016. Morningstar’s Active/Passive Barometer. Morningstar Manager Research, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschella, Manuela. 2012. Governing Risk: The IMF and Global Financial Crises. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münnich, Sascha. 2015. Readjusting Imagined Markets: Morality and Institutional Resilience in the German and British Bank Bailout of 2008. Socio-Economic Review 14 (2): 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, Pat. 1996. Risk and Responsibility. In Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government, ed. Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 189–207. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: The Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2017. OECD Sovereign Borrowing Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paudyn, Bartholomew. 2014. Credit Ratings and Sovereign Debt: The Political Economy of Creditworthiness Through Risk and Uncertainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Struggle to Perform the Political Economy of Creditworthiness. Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (6): 655–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, Michael. 2005. The Invention of Operational Risk. Review of International Political Economy 12 (4): 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth Rogoff. 2010. Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review 100 (2): 573–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1996. Governing “Advanced” Liberal Democracies. In Foucault and Political Reason, ed. Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose, 37–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Ravi K., Arthur T. Denzau, and Thomas D. Willett, eds. 2007. Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s. 2010. Guide to Credit Ratings Criteria. New York: S&P.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Sovereign Rating Methodology. New York: S&P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s Dow Jones. 2016. SPIVA Europe Scorecard. October 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph, and Daniel Heymann, eds. 2014. Life After Debt: The Origins and Resolutions of Debt Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2012. On the Performative Power of Financial Models. Economy and Society 41 (3): 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. 1996. Shut Up and Dance, or, is the World Economy Knowable? In The Global Economy in Transition, ed. P.W. Daniels and W.F. Lever, 11–23. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner Review. 2009. Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis. London: FSA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paudyn, B. (2018). The ‘Get Out of Jail Card’: The Immunity Risk Provides Financial Markets and Regulators from the Consequences of Their Mistakes. In: Kruck, A., Oppermann, K., Spencer, A. (eds) Political Mistakes and Policy Failures in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68173-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics