Abstract
As a result of deteriorating demographics and associated fiscal problems, many European countries face reforms that are believed to reduce pension system generosity. However, despite the fact that generosity is a term that is very often used in reference to the social policy outcomes, the current literature does not define it precisely, relying instead on its intuitive meaning. The paper aims at identifying and discussing different approaches to the concept of pension system generosity as seen from the microeconomic and macroeconomic perspective. It also attempts to evaluate and compare the generosity of pension systems in the European countries. The empirical research covers aggregated data for 27 states and employs selected indicators of pension system generosity associated with its identified dimensions. Statistical correlation analysis is also used to compare the convergence of the results of the generosity assessment from different perspectives. Consequently, this paper presents and collates several rankings of the studied countries in terms of the generosity of their pension systems. The main finding of the study is that the concept of pension system generosity is multidimensional and the perspective chosen affects the results of the assessment.
Notes
- 1.
This kind of replacement rate is sometimes called the benefit ratio (see Grech 2015).
- 2.
Originally, in the study of Andrews and Rashid (1996) GDP/contributor is used. However, due to the data availability in this study it GDP/employed is analyzed as a proxy.
- 3.
The employed formula accounts for ties.
References
Andrews, E. S., & Rashid, M. (1996). The financing of pension systems in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Technical Paper No. 339, Washington.
Borella, M., & Fornero, E. (2009). Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: An analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates. ENEPRI Research Report No. 68.
Chybalski, F. (2014). Financial stability of pension systems: A cross country analysis. In D. Stavarek & P. Vodova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on finance and banking (pp. 150–158). Karvina: Silesian University.
Clark, R. L., & Craig, L. A. (2011). Determinants of the generosity of pension plans for public school teachers, 1982–2006. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(1), 99–118.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gora, M. (2008). Retirement decisions, benefits and the neutrality of pension systems. ENEPRI Research Report No. 51.
Grech, A. G. (2013). How best to measure pension adequacy. CASE/172, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. London: London School of Economics.
Grech, A. G. (2015). The financial crisis and differences in state pension generosity across EU countries. CESifo DICE Report: A Quarterly Journal for Institutional Comparisons, 13(2), 36–41.
Kendall, M. G., & Babington Smith, B. (1939). The problem of m rankings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10, 275–287.
Marcinkiewicz, E., & Chybalski, F. (2014). How to measure and compare pension expenditures in cross-country analyses? Some methodological remarks. International Journal of Business and Management, 2(4), 43–59.
Meyer, T., Bridgen, P., & Andow, C. (2013). Free movement? The impact of legislation, benefit generosity and wages on the pensions of European migrants. Population, Space and Place, 19, 714–726.
Plesniak, A. (2011). Hojność systemów zabezpieczenia emerytalnego a oszczędzanie na starość [Pension systems generosity and saving for old age]. Polityka Społeczna, 2, 5–7.
Rajevska, O. (2016). Adequacy and equity of pensions as a function of pension system institutional design: A case of the Baltic States. Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia.
Scruggs, L. (2014, February). Social welfare generosity scores in CWED 2: A methodological genealogy. CWED Working Paper 01.
Wolf, F., Zohlnhofer, R., & Wenzelburger, G. (2014). The politics of public and private pension generosity in advanced democracies. Social Policy & Administration, 48(1), 86–106.
Zohlnhofer, R., Wolf, F., & Wenzelburger, G. (2012). Political parties and pension generosity in times of permanent austerity. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(1), 28–53.
Acknowledgements
This paper forms part of the project funded by the National Science Centre (Poland) under grant number DEC-2014/15/D/HS4/01238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marcinkiewicz, E. (2018). How Generous Are Contemporary Pension Systems? A Comparative Study of the European Countries. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67915-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67916-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)