Skip to main content

Research on Risk-Based Common European Union Deposit Insurance System in Lithuanian Banks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 8/1))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

Global 2008 financial crisis has shown that the deposit insurance system did not help to maintain depositor confidence and the whole banking sector financial stability in the beginning of banks’ failure. Scientific discussions emphasized that the main problem associated with the current deposit insurance system is the fact that many EU countries, current deposit systems do not evaluate the banks’ risks calculating deposit insurance premiums, and thus do not provide sufficient stability of the banking system. The aim of the research is to evaluate the risk-based common European deposit insurance system impact on deposit insurance premiums to Lithuanian banks. The research period for the analysis of deposit insurance premiums to Lithuanian banks is 2010–2014. In the risk-based model, the main risk indicators are evaluated by European Banking Authority. Performed deposit insurance system problem analysis showed that deposit insurance system has positive characteristics, it is a key tool in the fight against depositors panic and helps to maintain confidence in the financial institutions, but it also has a negative impact. Theoretical deposit insurance models evaluation showed that in many EU countries, the existing deposit insurance systems do not provide sufficient protection on depositors because contributions are not based on banks’ risk assessment, which means that deposit insurance does not perform one of its basic functions. The introduction of risk-based deposit insurance system would redistribute contributions among the Lithuanian banks and thus contribute to the negative effects of deposit insurance systems mitigation and growth of all financial system stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altunbas, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Deposit insurance and private capital inflows: Further evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 27, 243–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angkinand, A., & Wihlborg, C. (2010). Deposit insurance coverage, ownership, and banks’ risk-taking in emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(2), 252–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernet, B., & Walter, S. (2009). Design, structure and implementation of a modern deposit insurance scheme. The European Money and Finance Forum Vienna [pdf]. Accessed March 20, 2016, from https://www.suerf.org/docx/s_6547884cea64550284728eb26b0947ef_2437_suerf.pdf

  • Bijlsma, M., & van der Wiel, K. (2015). Consumer perception of deposit insurance: Little awareness, limited effectiveness? Applied Economics, 47(32), 3439–3461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Chang, C. P. (2015). Should bank loan portfolio be diversified under government capital injection and deposit insurance fund protection? International Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. C. Y., Osborne, D. K., & Horng, M. S. (2010). Random deposits, technical insolvency and deposit insurance pricing. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 13(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, K. H. (2011). Deposit insurance and banking stability. Cato Journal, 31(1), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBA. (2015). Guidelines on methods for calculating contributions to deposit guarantee schemes [online]. Accessed June 10, 2016, from https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1089322/EBA-GL-2015-10+GL+on+methods+for+calculating+contributions+to+DGS.pdf

  • Enkhbold, E., & Otgonshar, B. (2013). The effect of deposit insurance on risk taking in Asian Banks. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1), 104–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2009). Possible models for risk-based contributions to EU deposit guarantee schemes. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council Directive. (2014). Europos parlamento ir tarybos direktyva 2014/49/ES 2014 m. balandžio 16 d. dėl indėlių garantijų sistemų [European parliament and council directive 2014/49/ES 2014 years April 16 on deposit guarantee schemes] [online]. Accessed June 20, 2016, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/lt/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0049&from=EN

  • Gómez-Fernández-Aguado, P., & Partal-Ureña, A. (2013). Evaluating the effects of the EU directive proposal for risk-based deposit insurance premiums in Spain (Working paper series, WP FIECAC 13.01, pp. 1–29).

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Deposit Insurers (IADI). (2014). IADI core principles for effective deposit insurance systems [pdf]. Accessed March 5, 2016, from https://www.fdic.gov/deposit/deposits/international/iadi/CorePrinciplesforEffectiveDepositInsuranceSystems11-2014.pdf

  • Ioannidou, V. P., & Penas, M. F. (2010). Deposit insurance and bank risk-taking: Evidence from internal loan ratings. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. H., & Dewan, H. (2011). Deposit insurance scheme and banking crises: A special focus on less-developed countries. Empirical Economics, 41(1), 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I., Kim, I., & Han, Y. (2014). Deposit insurance, banks’ moral hazard, and regulation: Evidence from the ASEAN countries and Korea. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(6), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakštutienė, A., Krušinskas, R., & Rumšaitė, D. (2011). The influence of deposits insurance on the stability of the Baltic states banking system. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 12(3), 482–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prean, N., & Stix, H. (2011). The effect of raising deposit insurance coverage in times of financial crisis – Evidence from Croatian microdata. Economic Systems, 35(4), 496–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aida Barkauskaite .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lakstutiene, A., Barkauskaite, A. (2018). Research on Risk-Based Common European Union Deposit Insurance System in Lithuanian Banks. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics