Skip to main content

After a Flood Event

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flood Risk Management Strategies and Governance

Abstract

This chapter describes common governance challenges and good practices in the recovery phase after a flood event. Initially, all the water needs to be removed, either by flowing away naturally or through pumping out of the area. The area then requires to be cleaned, with any damaged buildings and infrastructure restored.

A common challenge is to make sure that sufficient money is available for recovery. In England as well as Belgium and France, insurance systems are in place. Either as part of the general household insurance such as in England, as part of the risk-fire insurance such as in Belgium, or as part of the private-public Cat Nat system in France. The Netherlands relies on a national compensation fund in case of natural disasters. In England a scheme is in place to compensate local authorities for unexpected costs related to floods.

Maintaining and restoring critical infrastructure, healthcare and other functions is another common challenge in the phase after a flood. In England a specific programme on critical infrastructure was launched that promotes organisations to integrate resilience into their networks to better absorb shocks and recover quicker after a flood event.

Ultimately, after a flood event lessons should be learned to better prepare for the future. In order to learn from the past we can turn to measures such as in England, where independent reviews are organised regarding flood risk management and responses to significant flood events. In Poland, the Millennium floods in 1997 triggered considerable changes in flood risk management resulting in much better preparation and response during the 2010 flood event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    National Reinsurance Company, CCR is a reinsurance company tasked with designing, implementing and managing efficient instruments providing reinsurance cover for exceptional perils to meet the needs of its clients as well as serve the general interest.

  2. 2.

    “Contrats socles” in French.

References

  • Alexander M, Priest S, Micou AP, Tapsell S, Green C, Parker D, Homewood S (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2011) Keeping the country running: natural hazards and infrastructure. Civil Contingencies Secretariat. Cabinet Office; London DG Environment (2014), Study on Economic and Social Benefits of Environmental Protection and Resource Efficiency Related to the European Semester, ENV.D.2/ETU/2013/0048r, Final version

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2013) Securing the future availability and affordability of home insurance in areas of flood risk. A consultation seeking views on the Government’s proposals for securing the availability and affordability of flood insurance in areas of flood risk. Defra, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ek K, Goytia S, Pettersson M, Spegel E (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Sweden – adaptation to climate change? STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann M, Van Doorn-Hoekveld WJ, Gilissen HK, Van Rijswick HFMW (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in the Netherlands. Drowning in safety? STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrue C, Bruzzone S, Lévy L, Gralepois M, Schellenberger T, Trémorin JB, Fournier M, Manson C, Thuilier T (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in France: from state policy to local strategies. STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Matczak P, Lewandowski J, Choryński A, Szwed M, Kundzewicz ZW (2016) Flood risk governance in Poland: looking for strategic planning in a country in transition. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mees H, Suykens C, Beyers JC, Crabbé A, Delvaux B, Deketelaere K (2016) Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Belgium. Dealing with flood risks in an urbanised and institutionally complex country. STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. T. (Tom) Raadgever .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Supplementary Electronic Material (S)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raadgever, G.T., Booister, N., Steenstra, M.K. (2018). After a Flood Event. In: Raadgever, T., Hegger, D. (eds) Flood Risk Management Strategies and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67699-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics