Abstract
This chapter investigates Hans Morgenthau’s last years in Europe, aiming to identify the role that his intellectual socialization in Germany, Spain, and Switzerland played for his later American writings. To that extent, two of Morgenthau’s European writings are being discussed in more detail: The Concept of the Political and the Theory of International Differences and On the Purpose of Science in These Times and on Human Destiny. In these texts, Morgenthau elaborated on the crisis of modern societies and spoke against positivistic sciences. In later years, this would bring him to formulate an ethics of responsibility and to support a reflective, democratic dimension in foreign policymaking, demonstrating the importance of the European Morgenthau for the American Morgenthau.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Letter to Ronald Hilton, 2 October 1937. Morgenthau Papers, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., Box 26.
- 2.
Throughout the chapter, I will refer to this English translation.
- 3.
Wissenschaft (to create knowledge) comprises any form of systematic knowledge creation and thus also comprises humanities. Wissenschaft is not confined to empirically verifiable knowledge, as we find it in the natural sciences. It is in this sense that Morgenthau used the term ‘science’, and it is in this sense that it is used in this chapter.
- 4.
Golo Mann , one of Thomas Mann’s sons, came to a similar conclusion: ‘of course, Morgenthau is now a hyper-American (Hyper-Amerikaner), but I would consider his thought to be very German’ (in Reichwein 2015: 95).
- 5.
All translations are by the author.
- 6.
Given Morgenthau’s odyssey through Europe, Walter Lacqueur’s (2016: 59) self-characterization as a ‘wanderer between several worlds’ might even be more appropriate.
- 7.
- 8.
It is partly in this sense that realism can be understood as an ‘intellectual moment of resistance’ (Mark Philip in Bell 2017: 3).
- 9.
Neumeyer was a law professor specializing in international private law at the University of Munich and from 1931 the dean of the faculty of law. Threatened by deportation into a concentration camp, he and his wife committed suicide in 1941.
- 10.
Letter to Rafael Altamira, 22 November 1939. Morgenthau Papers, Box 3.
- 11.
Most immediately, in 1979, the United States and many other countries faced an economic downturn due to the second oil crisis. The decreased oil production in the wake of the Iranian Revolution irretrievably destroyed the myth of a consistent economic rise to which numerous states under the Bretton Woods System had subscribed since the late 1940s. States could no longer control all the interrelationships of an increasingly globalized economy. Beyond the immediate economic crisis lay the development of nuclear weapons, which would profoundly affect Morgenthau’s ideas. Like that of many of his coevals, including Herz , Karl Jaspers , and Bertrand Russell (for more, see van Munster and Sylvest 2016), he experienced a ‘[m]odern technology [that] … had spun out of control and a technological juggernaut threatened humanity with the historically novel possibility of mass suicide’ (Morgenthau 1970b; Scheuerman 2009: 567). Nation-states had lost the ability to secure their territorial integrity and to guarantee the safety of their citizens. Borders became obsolete. In Morgenthau’s (1966a: 9, 1970a: 61–62) sense, a border is reduced to an artificial line on a map and the traditional concept of sovereignty that yielded exclusive rights to nation-states on the international level is rendered obsolete.
- 12.
Hartmut Behr (2010: 211; Behr and Kirke 2014) has argued that Politics Among Nations was conceived as a counter-ideology not only to fascism and communism, but also to nationalism , pointing to the later chapters of the first edition. They are all reflections on the possibility of minimalizing international conflict by seeking out the potential of global cooperation (see also Rösch 2015a; Frei 2016).
- 13.
To his students, Morgenthau (2004: 137) explained this as follows: ‘I haven’t come down from heaven to this chair and started to teach. I mean, obviously my mind has been formed by certain experiences. And naturally those experiences are part of my intellectual composition’.
- 14.
Participating in the Rockefeller Foundation-funded conference on international relations theory in 1954 can therefore be interpreted to have been a ‘gambit’ in Guilhot’s terms (2008, 2011) from Morgenthau’s side and from the side of other like-minded émigré scholars. It was their ambition to oppose the scientism of the behavioral revolution and argue against it from a hermeneutic position (critical Rohde 2016: 115). But the ‘osmosis’ that Gerald Stourzh (1965: 61) spotted remained underdeveloped and their impact was less substantial than some of the vitas of these scholars would suggest (Greenberg 1992: 76).
- 15.
Furthermore, in a letter to Arendt he reasoned that ‘we are intellectual streetfighters … So if we don’t make clear on which side of the barricades we stand we have failed’ (in Rohde 2005: 50). Similarly in a letter to Paul Nitze dated 12 February 1955, Morgenthau wrote that ‘we cannot assume to be able to look at the world scene form a vantage point which, as it were, lies outside this world. We stand on a particular spot within that world, physically, morally, and intellectually’.
- 16.
- 17.
References
Amstrup, Niels. 1978. The ‘Early’ Morgenthau. A Comment on the Intellectual Origins of Realism. Cooperation and Conflict 13 (2): 163–175.
Arendt, Hannah. 1990. Philosophy and Politics. Social Research 57 (1): 73–103.
Ashworth, Lucian M. 2014. A History of International Thought. From the Origins of the Modern State to Academic International Relations. London: Routledge.
Behr, Hartmut. 2010. A History of International Political Theory: Ontologies of the International. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2016. Scientific Man vs Power Politics: A Pamphlet and Its Author Between Two Academic Cultures. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 33–38.
Behr, Hartmut, and Felix Rösch. 2013. The Ethics of Anti-Hubris in the Political Philosophy of International Relations: Hans J. Morgenthau. In Religion and the Realist Tradition. From Political Theology to International Relations Theory and Back, ed. Jodok Troy, 111–128. London: Routledge.
Behr, Hartmut, and Michael C. Williams. 2017. Interlocuting Classical Realism and Critical Theory: Negotiating ‘Divides’ in International Relations Theory. Journal of International Political Theory 13 (1): 3–17.
Behr, Hartmut, and Xander Kirke. 2014. The Tale of a ‘Realism’ in International Relations. E-International Relations. http://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/13/the-tale-of-a-realism-in-international-relations/. Accessed 9 Oct 2017.
Bell, Duncan. 2009. Introduction: Under an Empty Sky—Realism and Political Theory. In Political Thought and International Relations. Variations on a Realist Theme, ed. Duncan Bell, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2017. Political Realism and International Relations. Philosophy Compass 12 (2): 1–12.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1993. Feminist Theory and Hannah Arendt’s Concept of Public Space. History of the Human Sciences 6 (2): 97–114.
Berg, Maggie, and Barbara Seeber. 2016. The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bigo, Didier, and R.B.J. Walker. 2007. Political Sociology and the Problem of the International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (3): 725–739.
Brown, Chris. 2007. ‘The Twilight of International Morality?’ Hans J. Morgenthau and Carl Schmitt on the End of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. In Realism Reconsidered. The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations, ed. Michael C. Williams, 42–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chou, Mark. 2011. Morgenthau, the Tragic: On Tragedy and the Transition from Scientific Man to Politics Among Nations. Telos 157: 109–128.
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 2008. Versuchungen der Unfreiheit. Die Intellektuellen in Zeiten der Prϋfung. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Frei, Christoph. 2001. Hans J. Morgenthau. An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
———. 2016. Politics Among Nations: Revisiting a Classic. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 39–46.
Friedländer, Saul. 1993. Memory, History, and the Extermination of the Jews of Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fromkin, David. 1993. Remembering Hans Morgenthau. World Policy Journal 10 (3): 81–88.
Galston, William A. 2010. Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4): 385–411.
Gangl, Manfred. 2009a. Einleitung. In Das Politische. Zur Entstehung der Politikwissenschaft während der Weimarer Republik, ed. Manfred Gangl, 7–18. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
———. 2009b. ‘Das Politische ist das Totale.’ Carl Schmitts Bestimmung des Politischen. In Das Politische. Zur Entstehung der Politikwissenschaft während der Weimarer Republik, ed. Manfred Gangl, 37–56. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Gellman, Peter. 1988. Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism. Review of International Studies 14 (4): 27–266.
Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gismondi, Mark. 2004. Tragedy, Realism, and Postmodernity: Kulturpessimismus in the Theories of Max Weber, E. H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau, and Henry Kissinger. Diplomacy and Statecraft 15 (3): 435–464.
Greenberg, Karen. 1992. Crossing the Boundary: German Refugee Scholars and the American Academic Tradition. In German and American Universities. Mutual Influences—Past and Present, ed. Ulrich Teichler and Henry Wasser, 67–79. Kassel: Wissenschaftliches Zentrum für Berufs- und Hochschulforschung der Gesamthochschule Kassel.
Greenberg, Udi. 2014. The Weimar Century. German Émigrés and the Ideological Foundations of the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2008. The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory. International Political Sociology 2 (4): 281–304.
———, ed. 2011. The Invention of International Relations Theory. Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hall, Ian. 2011. The Triumph of Anti-Liberalism? Reconciling Radicalism to Realism in International Relations Theory. Political Studies Review 9 (1): 42–52.
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. An Interpretation of American Political Thought since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Herz, John H. 2005. Letter to the Morgenthau Conference. In The Heritage, Challenge, and Future of Realism: In Memoriam Hans J. Morgenthau (1904–1980), ed. Christian Hacke, Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, and Kai M. Schellhorn, 23–28. Göttingen: V & R.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2014. Rationalizing Realpolitik: U.S. International Relations as a Liberal Field. In Professors and Their Politics, ed. Neil Gross and Solon Simmons, 267–290. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Jütersonke, Oliver. 2010. Morgenthau, Law and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katznelson, Ira. 2003. Desolation and Enlightenment. Political Knowledge After Total War, Totalitarianism, and the Holocaust. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kindermann, Gottfried-Karl. 2015. Interview zur Rolle Hans Morgenthaus in der Fachdisziplin Internationale Politik (with Christoph Rohde). In Macht, Recht, Demokratie. Zum Staatsverständnis Hans J. Morgenthaus, ed. Christoph Rohde and Jodok Troy, 19–25. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Klusmeyer, Douglas B. 2009. Beyond Tragedy: Hannah Arendt and Hans Morgenthau on Responsibility, Evil and Political Ethics. International Studies Review 11 (2): 332–351.
———. 2016. Death of the Statesman as Tragic Hero: Hans Morgenthau on the Vietnam War. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 63–71.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2000. Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations. In The Role of Law in International Politics. Essays in International Relations and International Law, ed. Michael Byers, 17–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kostagiannis, Konstantinos. 2014. Hans Morgenthau and the Tragedy of the Nation-State. International History Review 36 (3): 513–529.
Lacqueur, Walter. 2016. A Wanderer Between Several Worlds. In The Second Generation. Émigrés from Nazi Germany as Historians, ed. Andreas W. Daum, Hartmut Lehmann, and James J. Sheehan, 59–71. New York: Berghahn Books.
Landauer, Carl. 1935. Letter to Irma Thormann, March 25 (Leo Baeck Institute Archives, Hans Morgenthau Collection, Container 2, Folder 9).
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics. Ethics, Interests, and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2016. Hans Morgenthau and The Purpose of Political Science. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 55–62.
Link, Werner. 1965. Die Allgegenwart des Machtkampfes. Über die Prämissen der Theorie Hans J. Morgenthaus. Neue Politische Literatur 10: 17–22.
Molloy, Seán. 2003. Realism: A Problematic Paradigm. Security Dialogue 34 (1): 71–85.
———. 2009. Aristotle, Epicurus, Morgenthau and the Political Ethics of the Lesser Evil. Journal of International Political Theory 5 (1): 94–112.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1929. Die internationale Rechtspflege, ihr Wesen und ihre Grenzen. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag von Robert Noske.
———. 1930a. Über die Herkunft des Politischen aus dem Wesen des Menschen (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 151).
———. 1930b. Stresemann als Schöpfer der deutschen Völkerrechtspolitik. Die Justiz 5 (3): 169–176.
———. 1930c. Der Selbstmord mit gutem Gewissen. Zur Kritik des Pazifismus und der neuen deutschen Kriegsphilosophie (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 96).
———. 1930d. Zur Krise des akademischen Unterrichts. Frankfurter Zeitung (March 9): 8.
———. 1932. Der Kampf der deutschen Staatsrechtslehre um die Wirklichkeit des Staates (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 110).
———. 1933. La notion du ‘politique’ et la théorie des différends internationaux. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
———. 1934. Über den Sinn der Wissenschaft in dieser Zeit und über die Bestimmung des Menschen (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 151).
———. 1936. Positivisme mal compris et théorie réaliste du droit international. In Colección de estudios históricos, jurídicos, pedagógicos y literarios. Homenaje a D. Rafael Altamira, ed. Silvio A. Zavala, 1–20. Madrid: C. Bermejo.
———. 1938. Das Problem der amerikanischen Universität. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (January 10): 5.
———. 1940. Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law. American Journal of International Law 34 (2): 260–284.
———. 1944. The Limitations of Science and the Problem of Social Planning. Ethics 54 (3): 174–185.
———. 1947. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. London: Latimer House.
———. 1948. The Problem of Sovereignty Reconsidered. Columbia Law Review 48 (3): 341–365.
———. 1949. The Limits of Practicability in the Social Sciences. Section IV.B of the Steering Committee on the Social Science and Values Project Report (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 74).
———. 1951. In Defense of the National Interest. A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
———. 1952a. What Is the National Interest of the United States? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 282: 1–7.
———. 1952b. Philosophy of International Relations Lectures (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Box 81).
———. 1955. Reflections on the State of Political Science. Review of Politics 17 (4): 431–460.
———. 1959. The Nature and Limits of a Theory of International Relations. In Theoretical Aspects of International Relations, ed. William T.R. Fox, 15–28. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
———. 1960. The Social Crisis in America: Hedonism of Status Quo. Chicago Review 14 (2): 69–88.
———. 1962a. Politics in the Twentieth Century. Volume I. The Decline of Democratic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1962b. Politics in the Twentieth Century. Volume III. The Restoration of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1963. On Trying to Be Just. Commentary (May issue): 420–423.
———. 1964. Modern Science and Political Power. Columbia Law Review 64 (4): 1386–1409.
———. 1966a. Introduction. In A Working Peace System, ed. David Mitrany, 7–11. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
———. 1966b. The Purpose of Political Science. In A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objectives, and Methods, ed. James C. Charlesworth, 63–79. Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Science.
———. 1970a. Truth and Power. Essays of a Decade, 1960–1970. London: Pall Mall Press.
———. 1970b. Der Friede im nuklearen Zeitalter. In Der Friede im nuklearen Zeitalter. Eine Kontroverse zwischen Realisten und Utopisten. 4. Salzburger Humanismusgespräch, ed. Oskar Schatz, 34–62. Munich: Manz Verlag.
———. 1972. Science: Servant or Master? New York: New American Library.
———. 1973. Macht und Ohnmacht des Menschen im technologischen Zeitalter. In Was wird aus dem Menschen? Der Fortschritt—Analysen und Warnungen bedeutender Denker, ed. Oskar Schatz, 47–60. Graz: Verlag Styria.
———. 1979. Human Rights and Foreign Policy. New York: Council on Religion and International Affairs.
———. 1984. Postscript to the Transaction Edition: Bernard Johnson’s Interview with Hans J. Morgenthau. In Truth and Tragedy. A Tribute to Hans J. Morgenthau, ed. Kenneth W. Thompson and Robert J. Myers, 333–386. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
———. 2004. Political Theory and International Affairs. Hans J. Morgenthau on Aristotle’s the Politics, ed. Anthony F. Lang, Jr. Westport: Praeger.
———. 2012. In The Concept of the Political, ed. Hartmut Behr and Felix Rösch. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. n.d. The Significance of Being Alone (Leo Baeck Institute Archives, Hans Morgenthau Collection, Container 4, Folder 6).
Munster, Rens van, and Caspar Sylvest. 2016. Nuclear Realism: Global Political Thought During the Thermonuclear Revolution. London: Routledge.
Navari, Cornelia. 2016. Hans Morgenthau and the National Interest. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 47–54.
Pichler, Hans-Karl. 1998. The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau’s Theory of Power Politics. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 185–200.
Puglierin, Jana. 2008. Towards Being a ‘Traveller Between All Worlds’. International Relations 22 (4): 419–425.
Radbruch, Gustav. 1929. Letter to Karl Strupp, 25th June (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Container 48).
Reichwein, Alexander. 2015. Morgenthau, Vietnam und die Sorge um Amerika: Zum Staats- und Demokratieverständnis eines ‘ziemlich deutschen’ Realisten. In Macht, Recht, Demokratie. Zum Staatsverständnis Hans J. Morgenthaus, ed. Christoph Rohde and Jodok Troy, 95–139. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Rengger, Nicholas. 2005. Tragedy or Scepticism? Defending the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics. International Relations 19 (3): 321–328.
Rohde, Christoph. 2005. Current Forms of Foreign Policy Realism in Morgenthau’s Tradition—Reflections on Political Realism in Germany. In The Heritage, Challenge, and Future of Realism: In Memoriam Hans J. Morgenthau (1904–1980), ed. Christian Hacke, Gottfried-Karl Kindermann, and Kai M. Schellhorn, 49–69. Göttingen: V & R.
———. 2016. Reinhold Niebuhr. Die Geburt des christlichen Realismus aus dem Geist des Widerstandes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Rösch, Felix. 2013a. Realism as Social Criticism: The Thinking Partnership of Hannah Arendt and Hans Morgenthau. International Politics 50 (6): 815–829.
———. 2013b. The Human Condition of Politics: Considering the Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau for International Relations. Journal of International Political Theory 9 (1): 1–21.
———. 2013c. Entpolitisierung in der Moderne. Zur Zentralität des Begriffs des Politischen im Denken Hans J. Morgenthaus. Zeitschrift für Politik 60 (4): 430–451.
———. 2015a. Die staatskritischen Potentiale des klassischen Realismus in Politcs among Nations. In Macht, Recht, Demokratie. Zum Staatsverständnis Hans J. Morgenthaus, ed. Christoph Rohde and Jodok Troy, 175–191. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
———. 2015b. Power, Knowledge, and Dissent in Morgenthau’s Worldview. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2016. Crisis, Values, and the Purpose of Science: Morgenthau in Europe. Ethics & International Affairs 30 (1): 1–9.
———. 2017. Unlearning Modernity. A Realist Method for Critical International Relations? Journal of International Political Theory 13 (1): 81–99.
Ross, Andrew A.G. 2013. Realism, Emotion, and Dynamic Allegiances in Global Politics. International Theory 5 (2): 273–299.
Sabaratnam, Meera. 2015. Staging a Battle, Losing the Wars? International Studies, ‘Science’ and the Neoliberalisation of the University. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (3): 975–979.
Scheuerman, William E. 2007. Carl Schmitt and Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond. In Realism Reconsidered. The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations, ed. Michael C. Williams, 62–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2009. Realism and the Critique of Technology. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (4): 563–584.
———. 2011. The Realist Case for a Global Reform. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schmitt, Carl. 1930. Staatsethik und pluralistischer Staat. Kant-Studien 35: 28–42.
———. 1932. Der Begriff des Politischen. Munich: Duncker & Humblot.
———. 1996. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schuett, Robert. 2010. Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations. The Resurrection of the Realist Man. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2013. The Logic of Legitimacy: Ethics in Political Realism. Review of Politics 75 (3): 407–432.
———. 2016. Strömungen der US-amerikanischen politischen Theorie. In Handbuch Politik USA, ed. Christian Lammert, Markus B. Siewert, and Boris Vormann, 73–92. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
Sinzheimer, Hugo. 1932. Letter to Hans J. Morgenthau, 11th March (Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, Container 197).
Speer, James P., II. 1968. Hans Morgenthau and the World State. World Politics 20 (2): 207–227.
Stourzh, Gerald. 1965. Die deutschsprachige Emigration in den Vereinigten Staaten: 1933–1963: Geschichtswissenschaft und Politische Wissenschaft. Jahrbuch für Amerikastudien 10: 59–77.
Thormann, Irma. 1935. Letter to Carl Landauer, January 18 (Leo Baeck Institute Archives, Hans Morgenthau Collection, Box 2, File 9).
Tickner, J. Ann. 2011. Dealing with Difference: Problems and Possibilities for Dialogue in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39 (3): 607–618.
Tjalve, Vibeke Schou. 2008. Realist Strategies of Republican Peace. Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Patriotic Dissent. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009. Realism and the Politics of (Dis)Enchantment. In Political Thought and International Relations. Variations on a Realist Theme, ed. Duncan Bell, 177–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tjalve, Vibeke Schou, and Michael C. Williams. 2015. Rethinking the Logic of Security: Liberal Realism and the Recovery of American Political Thought. Telos 177: 46–66.
Williams, Michael C. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rösch, F. (2018). Morgenthau in Europe: Searching for the Political. In: Navari, C. (eds) Hans J. Morgenthau and the American Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67498-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67498-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67497-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67498-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)