Skip to main content

The Use of Geological Background Reference Values for Soil Evaluation and Remediation: The Trajouce Ecopark Case-Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 751 Accesses

Abstract

2015 was proclaimed as the ‘International Year of Soils’ (IYS) at the 68th UN General Assembly. While soil is recognized as an essential, finite and non-renewable natural resource, it is increasingly degraded or irreversibly lost due to poor management and urban and infrastructure expansion, both in the EU and at a global level.

Soil contamination in particular has not only negative impacts on human health and ecosystems but also on economy, by the reduction in environmental services as a result of loss of natural soil capital and costs of land rehabilitation. The number of contaminated sites in the EU may exceed half a million. However, only a few EU Member States have specific legislation on soil protection. While the European Commission decided in May 2014 to withdraw the proposal for a Soil Framework Directive, the 7th Environment Action Programme, which entered into force on 17 January 2014, recognizes that soil degradation is a serious challenge and provides that by 2020 land is managed sustainably, soil is adequately protected and the remediation of contaminated sites is in good progress in the EU.

In Portugal draft legislation on the prevention of contamination and remediation of soils that seeks to eliminate major gap in the national legislative framework and comply with international commitments, was submitted for public consultation and is now being discussed. Among several innovations, for the definition of reference values for evaluation and remediation of soil, natural background values can be used instead of those adopted from the Ontario Standards [MOE (Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act., April 15, 2011. Ministry of the Environment, 2011)], or other international standards, for the most common contaminants, if duly justified and accepted by the Environmental Portuguese Agency.

This paper reports a case study in which the conducted site investigation, sampling and interpretation of results confirmed the existence of a neat relationship between the presence of vanadium and geological background of the region where the Trajouce Ecopark (TRATOLIXO) operates, which allowed to classify the soil resulting from the treatment of several areas affected by the inadequate disposal of urban solid waste as suitable for environmental rehabilitation of the site [EGIAMB (Estudo das Concentrações Naturais de Vanádio na Envolvência do Ecoparque de Trajouce. Final Report, 2014)].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • APA (2015) Projecto legislativo relativo à Prevenção da Contaminação e Remediação dos Solos (PRoSolos). For consultation from 04.09.2015 till 04.11.2015. http://participa.pt/consulta.jsp?loadP=820. Accessed Oct 2015

  • Costa CSA (2010) Mineralogia dos Solos de Lisboa e sua Influência na Fixação de Elementos Tóxicos. Dissertação para a obtenção do grau de Mestre, Universidade de Aveiro, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram-Heydrich S, Ponce de Léon C, Fernández-Lomelín P, Sommer-Cervantes I (2010) Chapter 2: Geogenic and anthropogenic differentiation of potentially toxic elements in superficial sediments from Cuitzeo Lake in México. In: Ramsey G, McHugh S (eds) River sediments. Nova Science, New York, NY, pp 37–75. ISBN 971-1-60741-437-7

    Google Scholar 

  • EGIAMB (2014) Estudo das Concentrações Naturais de Vanádio na Envolvência do Ecoparque de Trajouce. Final Report. R2013101A02. June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Galuzka A, Migaszewski Z (2011) Geochemical background – an environmental perspective. Mineralogia 42(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10002-011-0002-y.; www.Mineralogia.pl

  • MOE (2011) Soil, ground water and sediment standards for use under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act., April 15, 2011. Ministry of the Environment

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez T (1985) Petrologia do Complexo Vulcânico de Lisboa. Dissertação para a obtenção do grau de Doutor, Universidade de Lisboa, p 260

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho MM, Rey J, Zbyszewski G, Matos Alves CA, Palácios T, Moitinho de Alemeida F, Costa C, Kullberg MC (2001) Notícia Explicativa da Folha 34-C, Cascais. Instituto Geológico Mineiro, Lisboa, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MCR, Almeida, C, Munhá EJ (1998) Contaminação antropogénica por metais pesados nos solos da Várzea de Loures. Actas do V Congresso Nacional de Geologia, Comunicações dos Serv. Geológicos de Portugal. Tomo 84(2):E-98–E-101. Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS), Volume I – Human health evaluation manual (Part B – Development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC. EPA/540/1-89/002. December

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author Graça Brito acknowledge the support of the sabbatical grant number SFRH/BSAB/128454/2017 Ref. CRM:0061819.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graça Brito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brito, G., Costa, C., Vendas, D., Dias, S. (2018). The Use of Geological Background Reference Values for Soil Evaluation and Remediation: The Trajouce Ecopark Case-Study. In: Dias, A., Salmelin, B., Pereira, D., Dias, M. (eds) Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics