Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivating Language and Workplace Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motivating Language Theory

Abstract

Motivating language theory foundations rest on evidence that links it to important workplace outcomes. This chapter summarizes existing research on motivating language and its outcomes using multiple relationships and outcome measures. We present ML’s outcomes in three sections: outcomes that primarily benefit organizations, outcomes that primarily benefit followers, and causal evidence and ML antecedents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arts, J. W., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2005). What really drives innovation adoption? A meta-analysis on the antecedents of intentional versus actual consumer adoption behavior (Working Paper). Department of Marketing, Free University Amsterdam. Retrieved from Google Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, T. (2014). The effects of leader speech and leader motivating language on employee self-esteem. Unpublished dissertation, Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, K. L. (2011). The effects of leader communication medium and motivating language on perceived leader effectiveness. Unpublished dissertation, Northcentral University, Prescott Valley, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and Quasi-experimental designs for research. San Francisco, CA: Ravenio Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (2000). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (2009). Managing human resources (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. (2007). Do the leaders’ motivating language approaches relate to the subordinates’ level of job satisfaction in a unionized work environment? Unpublished dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K. (2006). The impact of motivational language and transformational leadership of the pastor on volunteers’ job satisfaction in Korean Southern Baptist churches in the United States. Unpublished dissertation, Regent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, K.-T., Chen, Y.-H., Wang, C.-W., & Chen, M. (2014). E-leadership effectiveness in virtual teams: Motivating language perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(3), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2001). Causation, statistics, and sociology. European Sociological Review, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/17.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grissom, R. J. (1994). Probability of the superior outcome of one treatment over another. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 314–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. T. (2012). The motivating language of principals: A sequential transformative strategy. Unpublished dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. T., & Parker, M. A. (2017). Empirically testing behavioral integrity and credibility as antecedents for the effective implementation of motivating language. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2005). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). Peru, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, D. F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, J. A. (2013). Motivating language theory: A cross-cultural comparison. Unpublished dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E. (2012). The influence of power distance and communication on Mexican workers. Journal of Business Communication, 49(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E. (2013). The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00191.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E., & Sexton, S. (2015). An application of motivating language theory in Mexican organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majors, J. M. (2008). Motivating language: Creating a culture of job satisfaction and performance. Unpublished masters thesis, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J. (1993). The role of motivating language in leader-member exchange. Unpublished dissertation, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M. (2011). Innovation. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 658–666). London: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2004). The effects of leader communication on worker innovation. American Business Review, 22(2), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2006). The benefits of leader communication on part-time worker outcomes: A comparison between part-time and full-time employees using motivating language. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(2), 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2007). The effects of leader communication on a worker’s intent to stay: An investigation using structural equation modeling. Human Performance, 20(2), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2009a). The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2009b). The role of leader-follower relationships in leader communication: A test using the LMX and motivating language models. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 8(1), 6–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2010). Leader-level influence on motivating language: A two-level model investigation on worker performance and job satisfaction. Competitiveness Review, 20(5), 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2012). The relationship between leader motivating language and self-efficacy: A partial least squares model analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2016). The effects of leader motivating language use on worker decision making. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2017). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Kopf, J. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 37(3–4), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, T. A., Harms, P. D., Steel, P., & Credé, M. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, S. C. W. (2013, December). Cultural intelligence and job performance in international transportation business settings. Unpublished dissertation, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX. Retrieved from https://tamiu-ir.tdl.org/tamiu-ir/handle/2152.4/82.

  • Sharbrough, W. C., Simmons, S. A., & Cantrill, D. A. (2006). Motivating language in industry: Its impact on job satisfaction and perceived supervisor effectiveness. Journal of Business Communication, 43(4), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943606291712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, S. A., & Sharbrough, W., III. (2013). An analysis of leader and subordinate perception of motivating language. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 10(3), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P.-C., Pan, F.-T., & Ho, C.-W. (2016). Does motivating language matter in leader–subordinate communication? Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.-W., Fan, K.-T., Hsieh, C.-T., & Menefee, M. L. (2009). Impact of motivating language on team creative performance. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, T., E., & Ruccio, S. E. (1998). The use of communication to motivate college sales teams. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(4), 468–499.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas A&M International University, Laredo, TX, USA

    Milton Mayfield & Jacqueline Mayfield

Authors
  1. Milton Mayfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacqueline Mayfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milton Mayfield .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J. (2018). Motivating Language and Workplace Outcomes. In: Motivating Language Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66930-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation