Abstract
It has been long argued that learning analytics has the potential to act as a “middle space” between the learning sciences and data analytics, creating technical possibilities for exploring the vast amount of data generated in online learning environments. One common learning analytics intervention is the learning dashboard, a support tool for teachers and learners alike that allows them to gain insight into the learning process. Although several related works have scrutinised the state-of-the-art in the field of learning dashboards, none have addressed the theoretical foundation that should inform the design of such interventions. In this systematic literature review, we analyse the extent to which theories and models from learning sciences have been integrated into the development of learning dashboards aimed at learners. Our critical examination reveals the most common educational concepts and the context in which they have been applied. We find evidence that current designs foster competition between learners rather than knowledge mastery, offering misguided frames of reference for comparison.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, T.: The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University Press, Edmonton (2008)
Beheshitha, S.S., Hatala, M., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S.: The role of achievement goal orientations when studying effect of learning analytics visualizations. In: Proceedings of LAK 2016, pp. 54–63. ACM (2016)
Bloom, B., Krathwohl, D., Masia, B.: Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn and Bacon, Pearson Education, Boston (1984)
Bodily, R., Verbert, K.: Trends and issues in student-facing learning analytics reporting systems research. In: Proceedings of LAK 2017, pp. 309–318. ACM (2017)
Charleer, S., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., Verbert, K., De Laet, T.: Creating effective learning analytics dashboards: lessons learnt. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 42–56. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_4
Corey, M.L., Leinenbach, M.T.: Universal design for learning: theory and practice. In: Proceedings of 2004 Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 4919–4926 (2004)
Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R.F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., Houben, G.J.: Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. In: Proceedings of LAK 2017, pp. 454–463. ACM (2017)
DeCarvalho, R.J.: The humanistic paradigm in education. Hum. Psychol. 19(1), 88 (1991)
Durall, E., Gros, B.: Learning analytics as a metacognitive tool. In: CSEDU, vol. 1, pp. 380–384 (2014)
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Facial action coding system (1977)
Elder, L., Paul, R.: Critical thinking: why we must transform our teaching. J. Dev. Educ. 18(1), 34 (1994)
Engeström, Y.: Expansive visibilization of work: an activity-theoretical perspective. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 8(1), 63–93 (1999)
Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 4(5–6), 304–317 (2012)
Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7(2), 117–140 (1954)
Few, S.: Information Dashboard Design: Displaying Data for At-a-Glance Monitoring. Analytics Press, Berkeley (2013)
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(1), 59–109 (2004)
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Siemens, G.: Lets not forget: learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends 59(1), 64–71 (2015)
Gelfand, M.J., Raver, J.L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L.M., Lun, J., Lim, B.C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., et al.: Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332(6033), 1100–1104 (2011)
Greller, W., Drachsler, H.: Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(3), 42–57 (2012)
Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Somyurek, S., Brusilovsky, P.: An intelligent interface for learning content: combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement. In: Proceedings of IUI 2016, pp. 152–163. ACM (2016)
Haggis, T.: Constructing images of ourselves? A critical investigation into ‘approaches to learning’ research in higher education. Br. Educ. Res. J. 29(1), 89–104 (2003)
Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, London (1991)
Huguet, P., Galvaing, M.P., Monteil, J.M., Dumas, F.: Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77(5), 1011 (1999)
Kim, B.: Social constructivism. Emerg. Perspect. Learn. Teach. Technol. 1(1), 16 (2001)
Kirkpatrick, D.L.: Evaluating Training Programs. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, San Francisco (1975)
Klerkx, J., Verbert, K., Duval, E.: Enhancing learning with visualization techniques. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 791–807. Springer, New York (2014)
Loboda, T.D., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Brusilovsky, P.: Mastery grids: an open source social educational progress visualization. In: Rensing, C., de Freitas, S., Ley, T., Muñoz-Merino, P.J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8719, pp. 235–248. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_18
Lonn, S., Aguilar, S.J., Teasley, S.D.: Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program. Comput. Hum. Behav. 47, 90–97 (2015)
Marzouk, Z., Rakovic, M., Liaqat, A., Vytasek, J., Samadi, D., Stewart-Alonso, J., Ram, I., Woloshen, S., Winne, P.H., Nesbit, J.C.: What if learning analytics were based on learning science? Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 32(6), 1–18 (2016)
McAlpine, L., Weston, C.: Reflection: issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instr. Sci. 28(5), 363–385 (2000)
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., PRISMA Group, et al.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6(7), 1000097 (2009)
Pintrich, P.R.: Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 92(3), 544 (2000)
Pintrich, P.R., De Groot, E.V.: Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(1), 33 (1990)
Sadler, D.R.: Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instr. Sci. 18(2), 119–144 (1989)
Schwendimann, B., Rodriguez-Triana, M., Vozniuk, A., Prieto, L., Boroujeni, M., Holzer, A., Gillet, D., Dillenbourg, P.: Perceiving learning at a glance: a systematic literature review of learning dashboard research. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 30–41 (2016)
Shum, S.B., Crick, R.D.: Learning dispositions and transferable competencies: pedagogy, modelling and learning analytics. In: Proceedings of LAK 2012, pp. 92–101. ACM (2012)
Siemens, G., Gašević, D.: Guest editorial-learning and knowledge analytics. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(3), 1–2 (2012)
Suthers, D., Verbert, K.: Learning analytics as a middle space. In: Proceedings of LAK 2013, pp. 1–4. ACM (2013)
Tan, J.P.L., Yang, S., Koh, E., Jonathan, C.: Fostering 21st century literacies through a collaborative critical reading and learning analytics environment: user-perceived benefits and problematics. In: Proceedings of LAK 2016, pp. 430–434. ACM (2016)
Trilling, B., Fadel, C.: 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)
Venant, R., Vidal, P., Broisin, J.: Evaluation of learner performance during practical activities: an experimentation in computer education. In: Proceedings of ICALT 2016, pp. 237–241. IEEE (2016)
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., Santos, J.L.: Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1500–1509 (2013)
Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J.L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., Klerkx, J.: Learning dashboards: an overview and future research opportunities. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 18(6), 1499–1514 (2014)
Winne, P.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. Self Regul. Learn. Acad. Achiev. Theor. Perspect. 2, 153–189 (2001)
Wise, A.F.: Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In: Proceedings of LAK 2014, pp. 203–211. ACM (2014)
Wu, W.H., Hsiao, H.C., Wu, P.L., Lin, C.H., Huang, S.H.: Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 28(3), 265–279 (2012)
Yoo, Y., Lee, H., Jo, I.-H., Park, Y.: Educational dashboards for smart learning: review of case studies. In: Chen, G., Kumar, V., Kinshuk, Huang, R., Kong, S.C., et al. (eds.) Emerging Issues in Smart Learning. LNET, pp. 145–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_21
Zimmerman, B.J.: Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ. psychol. 25(1), 3–17 (1990)
Zimmerman, B.J., Boekarts, M., Pintrich, P., Zeidner, M.: A social cognitive perspective. In: Handbook of Self-Regulation, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 695–716 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Specht, M. (2017). Awareness Is Not Enough: Pitfalls of Learning Analytics Dashboards in the Educational Practice. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66609-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66610-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)