Skip to main content

Introduction: Formulas of Betrayal”—Traitors, Collaborators and Deserters in Contemporary European Politics of Memory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Traitors, Collaborators and Deserters in Contemporary European Politics of Memory

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

Abstract

Basing their study on conceptualizations current in anthropology, history, memory studies, and cultural sociology, Eleonora Narvselius and Gelinada Grinchenko offer a new, complex approach to understanding the violations of loyalty and trust that constitute betrayal, as well as their present-day revisions. Acts of betrayal and their subsequent reinterpretations are viewed through the prism of power, boundary-making, and actorship. The main argument is that in the shifting political–ideological contexts of twentieth-century Europe, these three variables correlate in various, but not infinite, ways. This introductiory chapter addresses several possible strategies evident in revising the old and constructing the new “formulas of betrayal” in the current European context. One part of these strategies refers to the political and legal modalities of betrayal, while in others the cultural and social underpinnings of moral border-crossing and change of loyalty are decisive. The following chapters in the volume take the underlying motivations of “formulas of betrayal” into consideration in more detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, Jules (2016). Treason in America: Disloyalty Versus Dissent (Jules Archer History for Young Readers). Sky Pony Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerström, Malin (1991). Betrayal and Betrayers—The Sociology of Treachery. New Brunswick: Transaction. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, John A. (1968). “Collaborationism in World War II: The Integral Nationalist Variant in Eastern Europe”, The Journal of Modern History 40 (3): 396–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartov, Omer and Weitz, Eric D., eds. (2013). Shatterzone of Empires: Coexistence and Violence in the German, Habsburg, Russian, and Ottoman Borderlands. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic, Goran (2015). “Victimhood, Forgiveness and Reconciliation: In Stories of Bosnian War Survivors”. In Eugene L. Olsen (Ed.). Forgiveness: Social Significance, Health Impact and Psychological Effects (pp. 105–130). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt (1987). Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-modernity, and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yehuda, Nahman (2001). Betrayal and Treason: Violation of Trust and Loyalty. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergère, Marc (2004). Une société en épuration. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Бyдницкий O.B., Г.C. Зeлeнинa, peд. (2012). “Cвepшилocь. Пpишли нeмцы!” Идeйный кoллaбopaциoнизм в CCCP в пepиoд Beликoй Oтeчecтвeннoй вoйны. M.: Poccийcкaя пoлитичecкaя энциклoпeдия (POCCПЭH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burin, Philippe (1995). LaFrance à l’heureallemande. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capdevila, Luc (1999). Les Bretons au lendemain de l’Occupation. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Shari J. (1999). Politics Without the Past: The Absence of History in Postcommunist Nationalism. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confino, Alon (1997). Collective Memory and Cultural History: Problems of Method. The American Historical Review 102 (5): 1386–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crownshaw, Richard (2010). The Afterlife of Holocaust Memory in Contemporary Literature and Culture. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Peter (2004). Dangerous Liaisons: Collaboration and World War Two. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitru, Diana (2016). The State, Antisemitism, and Collaboration in the Holocaust. The Borderlands of Romania and The Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deák, István (2015). Europe on Trial: The Story of Collaboration, Resistance, and Retribution During II. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Martin (2005). “Where Did All the Collaborators Go?” Slavic Review 64 (4): 791–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donskis, Leonidas (2005). Loyalty, Dissent, and Betrayal. Modern Lithuania and East-Central European Moral Imagination. Amsterdam, New York, NY: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drapac, Vesna and Garieth, Pritchard (2015). “Beyond Resistance and Collaboration: Towards a Social History of Politics in Hitler’s Empire,”Journal of Social History 48 (4): 865–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltscher, Louise (2013). Traitors or Patriots? A Story of the German Anti-Nazi Resistance. Bloomingston: iUniverse LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, Mustafa (1994). “Network Analysis, Culture and the Problem of Agency,” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1411–1454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, Kenneth W. (2015). A European Anabasis: Western European Volunteers in the German Army and SS, 1940–1945: Helion & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feindt, Gregor, Félix Krawatzek, Daniela Mehler, Friedemann Pestel and Rieke Trimçev (2014).“Entangled Memory: Toward A Third Wave In Memory Studies”, History and Theory 53, 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum “On Collaboration in Poland and The Soviet Union During World War II” (2005), Slavic Review 64 (4): 711–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, William C. (2006). The Foe Within: Fantasies of Treason and the End of Imperial Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, Charles (2014). Deserter. William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill, John (2011). “Integrating the Past: Regional Integration and Historical Reckoning in Central and Eastern Europe”, Nationalities Papers 39 (4): 481–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Bertram M. (1980). Collaborationism in France During the Second World War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Jan Tomasz. (2000). “Themes for a Social History of War Experience and Collaboration.” In: Deák István, Jan T. Gross and Tony Judt (eds.). The Politics of Retribution in Europe: World War II and Its Aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Jan Tomasz (2001). Neighbors: The Destruction of the Jewish Community in Jedwabne, Poland. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Jan Tomasz (2006). Fear: Anti-semitism in Poland After Auschwitz: An Essay in Historical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Jan Tomasz and Irena Grudzinska (2012). Golden Harvest: Events at the Periphery of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guibernau, Montserrat (2013). Belonging: Solidarity and Division in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, Martin (2010). “Agency”. In: Wiebe, Elden, Albert J. Mills and Durepos, Gabrielle (eds.). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, Gerhard (1989). “Introduction”. In: Hirschfeld, Gerhard and Marsh, Patrick (ed.). Collaboration in France: Politics and Culture During the Nazi Occupation, 1940–1944. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley (1968). “Collaborationism in France During World War II,” The Journal of Modern History 40 (3): 375–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyse, Luc and Mark Salter (2008). Traditional Justice and Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences. Stockholm: International IDEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Rodger L. (2000). “The Sense and Sensibility of Betrayal: Discovering the Meaning of Treachery Through Jane Austen,” Humanitas 13 (2): 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jangfeldt, Bengt (2013). The Hero of Budapest: The Triumph and Tragedy of Raoul Wallenberg. London: Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Peter (1993). Frames of Deceit: A Study of the Loss and Recovery of Public and Private Trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Alice (2000). The Collaborator: The Trial and Execution of Robert Brasillach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Кoвaлeв Б.H. (2009). Кoллaбopaциoнизм в Poccии в 1941–1945 гг.: типы и фopмы. Beликий Hoвгopoд: HoвГУ имeни Яpocлaвa Myдpoгo, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard, Wulf Kansteiner, and Claudio Fogu, eds. (2006). The Politics of Memory in Postwar Europe. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liempt van, Ad (2005). Hitler’s Bounty Hunters. The Betrayal of the Jews. Oxford–New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, Vera (2003). “Hear No Evil, Read No Evil, Write No Evil. Inscriptions of French World War Two Collaborationism”. In: Parnell, Philip C. and Stephanie C. Kane (eds.). Crime’s Power: Anthropologists and the Ethnography of Crime. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 245–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marples, David R. (2007). Heroes and Villains: Creating National History in Contemporary Ukraine. Budapest–New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Barbara (1999). Narratives of Guilt and Compliance in Unified Germany. Stasi Informers and Their Impact on Society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, Georges and Laure Neumayer (2013). “Introduction.” In: Georges Mink and Laure Neumayer (eds.). History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Memory Games. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner (2002).“Introduction: The Power of Memory, the Memory of Power and the Power over Memory.” In: Jan-WernerMüller, (ed.). Memory and Power in Post-War Europe. Studies in the Presence of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, Laure (2015).“Integrating the Central European Past into a Common Narrative: The Mobilizations Around the ‘Crimes of Communism’ in the European Parliament,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (3): 344–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakier, Malgorzata and Bo Stråth (2010). “Introduction. A European Memory?” In: Malgorzata Pakier and Bo Stråth (eds.). A European Memory? Contemporary Histories and Politics of Remembrance. NewYork: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnell, Philip C. and Stephanie C. Kane, eds. (2003). Crime’s Power: Anthropologists and the Ethnography of Crime. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penter, Tanja (2005). “Collaboration on Trial: New Source Material on Soviet Postwar Trials Against Collaborators.” Slavic Review 64 (4): 782–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, Leonid (2011). The Kings and the Pawns. Collaboration in Byelorussia During World War II. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, Ernest (1990). “What Is a Nation?” (first publ. 1882). In: Homi K. Bhabha, (ed.). Nation and Narration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rings, Werner (1982). Life With the Enemy: Collaboration and Resistance in Hitler’s Europe, 1939–1945. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousso, Henry (1991). The
Vichy
Syndrome:
History
and
Memory
in
France
Since
1944. Cambridge, MA
and
London:
Harvard
University
Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, Judith (1984). “The Ambiguities of Betrayal”. In: Shklar, Judith. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Шaйкaн B.O. (2005). Кoлaбopaцioнiзм нa тepитopiї peйxcкoмicapiaтy “Укpaїнa” i вiйcькoвoї зoни в poки Дpyгoї cвiтoвoї вiйни. Moнoгpaфiя.-Кpивий Piг: Miнepaл, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierp, Aline (2014). History, Memory, and Trans-European Identity: Unifying Divisions. London and NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnaturi, Gabriella (2007). Betrayals: The Unpredictability of Human Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgili, Fabrice (2002). Shorn Women: Gender and Punishment in Liberation France. English ed. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Amir (2001). Making Sense of War: The Second World War and the Fate of the Bolshevik Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Andreas (2013). Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert (1987). Meaning and Moral Order. Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkley—Los Angeles—London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Takashi (2006). The Making of the “Rape of Nanking”. History and Memory in Japan, China, and The United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonora Narvselius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Narvselius, E., Grinchenko, G. (2018). Introduction: Formulas of Betrayal”—Traitors, Collaborators and Deserters in Contemporary European Politics of Memory. In: Grinchenko, G., Narvselius, E. (eds) Traitors, Collaborators and Deserters in Contemporary European Politics of Memory. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66496-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics