Abstract
The profession of psychology and the profession of arms have been integrally intertwined for more than a century. Both clinical and research psychologists share a long and distinguished history of service to the nation in support of military personnel and military leaders. Certain elements of the practice of psychology in military settings create unique and sometimes intense ethical tensions and conflicts for psychologists. These are often particularly acute for psychologists serving as active duty military officers. This chapter describes the aspects of military psychology practice that heighten ethical tensions and quandaries for psychologists. The authors summarize seven specific ethical quandaries that occur with the greatest frequency or create the most acute conflicts for military psychologists. Illustrative vignettes are employed to bring these issues to life. The authors conclude with a set of recommendations designed to help psychologists ameliorate and manage common ethical tensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
American Psychological Association. (2015). APA alerts federal officials to new policy banning psychologists from national security interrogations. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2015/10/banning-psychologists-interrogations.aspx
Barnett, J. E., & Johnson, W. B. (2008). The ethics desk reference for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Budd, F. C., & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). Introduction to clinical military psychology. In C. H. Kennedy & E. A. Zillmer (Eds.), Military psychology: Clinical and operational applications (pp. 21–34). New York: Guilford.
Daneault, S. (2008). The wounded healer. Canadian Family Physician, 54, 1218–1219.
Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Harrison, R. V., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 1094–1102.
Driskell, J. E., & Olmstead, B. (1989). Psychology in the military: Research applications and trends. American Psychologist, 44, 43–54.
Gutheil, T. G., & Gabbard, G. O. (1993). The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 188–196.
Howe, E. G. (2003). Mixed agency in military medicine: Ethical roles in conflict. In D. E. Lounsbury & R. F. Bellamy (Eds.), Military medical ethics: Volume I (pp. 331–365). Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, U. S. Department of the Army.
Jeffery, T. B., Rankin, R. J., & Jeffery, L. K. (1992). In service of two masters: The ethical-legal dilemma faced by military psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23, 91–95.
Johnson, W. B. (2008). Top ethical challenges for military clinical psychologists. Military Psychology, 20, 49–62.
Johnson, W. B. (2013a). Mixed-agency dilemmas in military psychology. In B. Moore & J. Barnett (Eds.), The military psychologist’s desk reference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, W. B. (2013b). Psychologists’ roles in national security: Getting beyond dichotomous thinking [review of the film Doctors of the dark side, directed by M. Davis]. PsycCritiques, 58(9). http://psqtest.typepad.com/blogPostPDFs/201312976_psq_58-19_psychologistsRolesInNationalSecurity.pdf
Johnson, W. B. (2014). Multiple relationships in military mental health counseling. In B. Herlihy & G. Corey (Eds.), Boundary issues in counseling: Multiple roles and responsibilities (3rd ed., pp. 254–259). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Johnson, W. B. (2016). Military settings. In J. Norcross, G. R. VandenBos, & D. K. Freedheim (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical psychology: Vol 1 (pp. 495–507). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Johnson, W. B., Bertschinger, M., Foster, A., & Jeter, A. (2014). Secondary trauma and ethical obligations for military psychologists: Preserving compassion and competence in the crucible of combat. Psychological Services, 11, 68–74.
Johnson, W. B., Grasso, I., & Maslowski, K. (2010). Conflicts between ethics and law for military mental health providers. Military Medicine, 175, 548–553.
Johnson, W. B., Ralph, J., & Johnson, S. J. (2005). Managing multiple roles in embedded environments: The case of aircraft carrier psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 73–81.
Kennedy, C. H., & Johnson, W. B. (2009). Mixed agency in military psychology: Applying the American Psychological Association ethics code. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 6, 22–31.
Kennedy, C. H., & McNeil, J. A. (2006). A history of military psychology. In C. H. Kennedy & E. A. Zillmer (Eds.), Military psychology: Clinical and operational applications (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford Press.
Kitchener, K. S. (2000). Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching in psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kraft, H. S. (2007). Rule number two: Lessons I learned in a combat hospital. New York: Little, Brown.
McCauley, M., Hughes, J. H., & Liebling-Kalifani, H. (2008). Ethical considerations for military clinical psychologists: A review of selected literature. Military Psychology, 20, 7–20.
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Oslo, Norway: Campbell Collaboration.
Moore, B. A., & Barnett, J. E. (2013). The military psychologist’s desk reference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moore, B. A., & Reger, G. M. (2006). Clinician to frontline soldier: A look at the roles and challenges of Army clinical psychologists in Iraq. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 395–403.
Zur, O., & Gonzalez, S. (2002). Multiple relationships in military psychology. In A. A. Lazarus & O. Zur (Eds.), Dual relationships and psychotherapy (pp. 315–328). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, W.B., Landsinger, K.L. (2017). Ethical Issues in Military Psychology. In: Bowles, S., Bartone, P. (eds) Handbook of Military Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66192-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66192-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66190-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66192-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)