Skip to main content

Development Models, Agricultural Policies and Agricultural Growth: Peru, 1950–2010

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Development in the World Periphery

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

Abstract

Throughout its history, Peru, as a small open economy, has undergone cycles of crisis and recovery, usually linked to fluctuations in the international market. The Peruvian economy has always been an exporter of primary products and an importer of manufactured goods. Chapter 16 has a two-fold aim: to identify the salient characteristics of the development models and policies affecting Peruvian agriculture since the mid-twentieth century, and to identify what effect they have had on agricultural production and productivity based on an estimation of total-factor productivity (TFP) for the 1950–2010 period. Development strategy models have ranged from the diversification of primary exports to import-substitution industrialisation and to the promotion of non-traditional exports, which is the current model.These strategies have determined the outcome for agriculture.

This study has received financial support from Spain’s Ministry of Science and Innovation, project ECO2015-65582 and from the Government of Aragon, through the Research Group ‘Agri-food Economic History (nineteenth and twentieth Centuries)’. The authors wish to thank Montserrat López-Jérez and participants at the Meeting “Agricultural development in the world periphery. A global economic history approach” (University of Zaragoza, April 2017) for their help and advice. The usual disclaimers apply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Concern over industrialisation is part of an old debate in the economic history of Peru. The subject arose in the political arena every time there was a crisis in the export sector. These periods can be identified in the 1880s, after the War of the Pacific; in the Great Depression ; and in WWII.

  2. 2.

    For a detailed analysis of the stabilisation policy and macroeconomic performance of agriculture , see León (1994) and Dancourt and Mendoza (1994).

  3. 3.

    Dancourt and Mendoza (1994) discuss the implications and effectiveness of import tariffs on agricultural products.

  4. 4.

    Despite these trends, it should be borne in mind that the BAP’s coverage did not reach all farms, and this was most noticeable in small-scale agriculture . Data from the National Survey of Rural Households (Encuesta Nacional de Hogares Rurales; Portocarrero, 1987) show that in 1984, only 7.6 per cent of farms had access to loans from the BAP. This information is crucial when considering the importance of alternative, informal sources of agricultural credit and the impact on interest rates.

  5. 5.

    This expansion of the agricultural export sector can be related to the trends identified in Latin America , as well as the ways capitalism can expand into agriculture , as described by de Janvry (1981), when considering commercial and contract farming as the predominant modes in the region. This subject has yet to be researched in the context of Peruvian agriculture . Some initial thoughts and hypotheses on this process can be found in Eguren (2003) and Valcárcel (2002).

  6. 6.

    The agrarian reform was executed mainly on the coast and in the highlands, the two regions with greater rural populations and greater areas of agricultural use. Between June 1969 and June 1979, 15,826 properties and more than 9 million ha were expropriated. Most of this area was transferred to 370,000 beneficiaries (Eguren, 2006).

  7. 7.

    Mejía (1982) provides some examples of the problems faced by these companies. A study carried out in 1977 by a High-Level Commission of the Ministry of Agriculture clearly revealed this fact. Of 1,388 existing companies at that time, 955 (68%) had no manager and 659 (47%) lacked accounting. At the same time, the problems of lack of human resources were classified as serious in 1,088 cases (78%); lack of training in 941 cases (68%); and lack of business organisation in 633 cases (48%).

  8. 8.

    Regarding the terms of term (ratio of export prices to import prices), a correlation coefficient between the terms of trade and an openness trade ratio (agricultural exports to agricultural GDP) for the period 1950–2010 is 0.61, suggesting a significant and positive relationship.

  9. 9.

    Further information about the sources of data for estimating TFP is found in Velazco & Pinilla (2017).

  10. 10.

    The Brazilian weights were preferred due to the fact that we used the same five inputs in our empirical analysis.

References

  • Alberts, T. (1983). Agrarian Reform and Rural Poverty: A Case Study of Peru. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, E. (1983). Política Económica y Agricultura en el Perú, 1969–1979. Lima: IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, A., & Evenson, R. (1995). Total Factor Productivity Growth in Brazilian Agriculture and the Role of Agricultural Research. In Anais do XXXIII Congresso Brasileiro de Economia e Sociologia Rural (Vol. 1, pp. 631–657). Curitiba, 31/07 a 03/09/95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, A., Romano, L., & Garagorry, F. (2010). Agricultural productivity in Latin American and the Caribbean and sources of growth. In E. Pingali & R. Evenson (Eds.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 3714–3768). North Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banco Mundial. (2010). El Mercado Laboral Peruano Durante el Auge y Caída. Washington, DC: Banco Mundial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger-Mkhize, H., Bourguignon, C., & van den Brink, R. (2009). Agricultural Land Redistribution: Toward Greater Consensus. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourliaud, J., & Eresue, M. (2015). La (re)concentración de las tierras en la costa. La Revista Agraria, 169, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque, S., & Palmer, D. (1975). Transforming the Rural Sector: Government Policy and Peasant Response. In A. Lowental (Ed.), The Peruvian Experiment (pp. 179–219). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ortega, C., & Lederman, D. (2004). Agricultural Productivity and Its Determinants: Revisiting International Experiences. Estudios de Economía, 31(2), 133–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer-Thomas, V. (1994). La historia económica de América Latina desde la independencia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burneo, Z. (2011). El Proceso de Concentración de la Tierra en el Perú. Lima: CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., & Viswanathan, P. K. (2018). Plantations and Economic Development in the Twentieth Century: End of an Era? In V. Pinilla & H. Willebald (Eds.), Agricultural Development in the World Periphery: A Global Economic History Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T., & Rao, D. (2005). Total Factor Productivity Growth in Agriculture: A Malmquist Index Analysis of 93 Countries, 1980–2000. Agricultural Economics, 32(1s), 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancourt, O., & Mendoza, W. (1994). Agricultura y Política de Estabilización en el Perú. In O. Dancourt, E. Mayer, & C. Monge (Eds.). Perú and Lima: El problema agrario en debate. SEPIA V and SEPIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A. (1981). The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latín América. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A. (1994). Social and Economic Reforms: The Challenge of Equitable Growth in Latin American Agriculture. In E. Muchnik & A. Niño de Zepeda (Eds.), Apertura Económica, Modernización y Sostenibilidad de la Agricultura (pp. 79–98). Santiago de Chile: Asociación de Latinoamérica y del Caribe de Economistas Agrarios (ALACEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguren, F. (2003). Las Políticas Agrarias en la última década: Una Evaluación. Ponencia balance presentada al SEPIA X, Pucallpa (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguren, F. (2006). Reforma agraria y desarrollo rural en el Perú. In F. Eguren (Ed.), Reforma agraria y desarrollo rural en la región Andina (pp. 11–32). Lima: CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobal, J. (1989). Políticas de Precios y Subsidios Agrícolas: Impactos Macroeconómico y Sectorial. Perú 1985–1989. Documento de Trabajo No.5, GRADE, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobal, J. (1993). Relaciones de largo plazo entre el sector agrícola y en no agrícola: Un estudio de cointegración para la economía peruana. Economía, XVI(31), 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobal, J., & Ponce, C. (2008). Dinámicas Provinciales de Pobreza en el Perú 1993–2005. Working Papers 011. Santiago: Rimisp Latin American Center for Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo, J. (2015). Concentración de tierras a la peruana. La Revista Agraria, 169, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, A. (1990). Desarrollo agrícola en América latina: teoría y políticas. Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1990–88, Departamento de Economía—Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, A. (1996). Pequeña agricultura y agroindustria en el Perú. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie, K. (2012). Productivity Growth and Technology Capital in the Global Agricultural Economy. In K. Fuglie, S. Wang, & V. Ball (Eds.), Productivity Growth in Agriculture: An International Perspective (pp. 335–369). Oxfordshire: CAB International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gamero, J. (2012). Derechos Laborales y Empleo en la Agroexportación. Lima: RedGE and CEPES.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. (2008). Censos Nacionales 2007. XI de población y VI de vivienda. Primeros resultados. INEI: Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. (2009). Perú: Migraciones internas 1993–2007. Lima: INEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. (2013). Resultados Definitivos. IV Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2012. Lima: INEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. (1994). Rural Development and Agrarian Issues in Contemporary Latin America. Working Paper No. 173, Institute of Social Studies. La Haya: ISS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. (2002). Agrarian Reform and the Neoliberal Counter-Reform in Latin America’. In J. Chase (Ed.), The Spaces of Neoliberalism: Land, Place and Family in Latin America (pp. 25–52). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon, J. (1994) Política de Estabilización y Crisis Agraria. In O. Dancourt, E. Mayer, & C. Monge (Eds.). Perú: El problema agrario en debate. Sepia V. Lima: Sepia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludena, C. (2010). Agricultural Productivity Growth, Efficiency Change and Technical Progress in Latin American and the Caribbean. IDB Working Paper Series No.IDB-WP-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Retortillo, M., Pinilla, V., Velazco, J., & Willebald, H. (2018). The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs? Agricultural Development in Latin America in the 20th Century. In V. Pinilla & H. Willebald (Eds.), Agricultural Development in the World Periphery: A Global Economic History Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejía, M. (1982). Perú 1969–1980. La penúltima reforma agraria latinoamericana. Comercio Exterior, 32(4), 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nin-Pratt A., & Yu, B. (2009, August 16–22). Getting Implicit Shadow Prices Right for the Estimation of the Malmquist Index: The Case of Agricultural Total Factor Productivity in Developing Countries. Paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, L. (2003). Agricultural Productivity Growth in the Andean Community. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5), 1335–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portocarrero, J. (Ed.). (1987). Los hogares rurales en el Perú. Importancia y articulación con el desarrollo agrario. GAPA/PADI. Ministerio de Agricultura. Lima: Fundación Friedrich Ebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROINVERSIÓN. (2007). Sembrando oportunidades. Lima: PROINVERSION.

    Google Scholar 

  • RedGe. (2012). ¿Más Exportaciones, Menos Agua? Exportación de Espárragos Amenaza el agua de Ica. Alerta Urgente. No. 10, marzo, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, J. (1993). El Perú hasta 1960. Políticas liberales en una economía abierta. Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1993-109, Departamento de Economía—Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello, M. (2009). Impacto de los choques externos, ciclos económicos y arreglos preferenciales comerciales sobre la producción agropecuaria en el Perú, 1950–2007. CISEPA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Working Paper No. 277, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, R., & Bertram, G. (1978). Peru 1890–1977: Growth and Policy in an Open Economy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vakis, R., Herrera, J., & Escobal, J. (2008). Una mirada a la evolución reciente de la pobreza en el Perú: avances y desafíos. Lima: Banco Mundial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcárcel, M. (2002). Agroexportación No Tradicional, sistema esparraguero, agricultura de Contrata y ONG. Debate Agrario No. 34, CEPES, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valderrama, M. (1976). 7 años de reforma agraria peruana, 1969–1976. Lima: Fondo Editorial PUCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazco, J. (2001). Agricultural production in Peru (1950–1995): Sources of growth. In L. Zepeda (Ed.), Agricultural Investment and Productivity in Developing Countries. Economic and Social Development Paper No. 148. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazco, J. & Pinilla, V. (2017). Development Models, Agricultural Policies, and Agricultural Growth: Peru, 1950–2010. SEHA Working Paper (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Velazco, J., & Velazco, J. (2012). Características del Empleo Agrícola en el Perú. In C. Garavito & I. Muñoz (Eds.), Empleo y Protección Social en el Perú. Lima: Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hesse, M. (2000). Aspectos Macroeconómicos. In M. Von Hesse, C. Trivelli, A. Diez, & L. Castillo (Eds.), Desafíos del Desarrollo Rural en el Perú. Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social: Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, C., & Pastor, M. (1992). Peruvian Economic Policy in the 1980s: From Orthodoxy to Heterodoxy and Back. Latin American Research Review., 27, 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zegarra, E. (1999). El mercado de tierras rurales en el Perú. Vol. I Análisis institucional. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Velazco, J., Pinilla, V. (2018). Development Models, Agricultural Policies and Agricultural Growth: Peru, 1950–2010. In: Pinilla, V., Willebald, H. (eds) Agricultural Development in the World Periphery. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66020-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics