Skip to main content

Is There a Link Between ICP-Derived Infusion Test Parameters and Outcome After Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI

Abstract

Objective: The term “hydrocephalus” encompasses a range of disorders characterised by clinical symptoms, abnormal brain imaging and derangement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. The ability to elucidate which patients would benefit from CSF diversion (a shunt or third ventriculostomy) is often unclear. Similar difficulties are encountered in shunted patients to predict the scope for improvement by shunt re-adjustment or revision.

Materials and methods: We compared retrospective pre-shunting infusion test results performed in 310 adult patients diagnosed with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and their improvement after shunting.

Results: Resistance to CSF outflow correlated significantly with improvement (p < 0.05). Other markers known from the literature, such as amplitude in CSF pulse pressure, the slope of the amplitude–pressure regression line, or elasticity did not show any correlation with outcome.

Conclusion: Outcome following shunting in adult NPH is associated with resistance to CSF outflow; however, the latter cannot be taken as an absolute predictor of shunt response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Børgesen SE, Gjerris F. The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain. 1982;105:65–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katzman R, Hussey F. A simple constant infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. Neurology (Minneap). 1970;20:534–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boon AJ, Tans JT, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HA, Avezaat CJ, de Jong DA, Gooskens RH, Hermans J. Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(5):687–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wikkelsø C, Hellström P, Klinge PM, Tans JT. European iNPH Multicentre Study Group. The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(5):562–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Børgesen SE, Albeck MJ, Gjerris F, Czosnyka M, Laniewski P. Computerized infusion test compared to steady pressure constant infusion test in measurement of resistance to CSF outflow. Acta Neurochir. 1992;119(1–4):12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, Di Chirico A, Mangiola A, Petrella G, Santini P. Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(1):64–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eide PK, Brean A. Intracranial pulse pressure amplitude levels determined during preoperative assessment of subjects with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir. 2006;148(11):1151–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest statement

We declare that MC has a financial interest in a fraction of ICM+ software licensing fee (licensed by Cambridge Enterprise Ltd, UK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zofia Czosnyka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nabbanja, E. et al. (2018). Is There a Link Between ICP-Derived Infusion Test Parameters and Outcome After Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus?. In: Heldt, T. (eds) Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65797-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65798-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics