Skip to main content

Enhancing the Potential of Cultural Entrepreneurship: Connecting Regional Development and Performance of Cultural Firms in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship in Culture and Creative Industries

Part of the book series: FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship ((FGFS))

Abstract

It is commonly recognized that individuals’ motivations drive the entrepreneurial process, though the qualities and outcomes of such are regulated by the environment. This article focuses on the regional dimension of entrepreneurship in the cultural sector found within Europe. A large sample of cultural firms from 13 European countries were selected from the Amadeus database in order to study the relationship of cultural firms’ performances and regional development using linear mixed models. Relevant results of this article include the finding that regional entrepreneurial development is related to the performance of cultural firms with respect to their primary relationships, capital financing, and firm debt. Moreover, there is evidence that variability of results is associated with the country, as opposed to the regional, level. Lastly, differences depend on the cultural sector under concern and on the different dimensions of regional entrepreneurial development. We conclude with some policy recommendations and reflections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout the article we use cultural entrepreneurship as denoting both the firms in the cultural as well as creative sector.

  2. 2.

    The choice of the countries was guided by data availability and geographic representation.

  3. 3.

    Related to the topic we could also mention works of DeAngelo and Masulis (1980), Taggart (1985), Ashton (1989), Adedeji (1998), Klapper et al. (2002), Graham (2003), Frank and Goyal (2005).

  4. 4.

    In the robustness checks we included both the Dilli and Elert (2016) classification, as well as the more common welfare regime and capitalism systems’ typologies; no significant differences in the main results were observed.

Reference

  • Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2009). The global entrepreneurship index (GEINDEX). Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(5), 341–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2010). The global entrepreneurship and development index 2011. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2011). The global entrepreneurship and development index 2012. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Evans, D. (1994). Why does the self-employment rate vary across countries and over time? CERP Working Paper No. 871, Center for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Arenius, P., Hay, M., & Minniti, M. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 executive report. London/Babson Park MA: London Business School/Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2013a). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy. ISSN 0048-7333. Available online October 11, 2013, from 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016

  • Acs, Z. J., Szerb, L., & Autio, E. (2013b). The global entrepreneurship and development index 2013. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adedeji, A. (1998). Does the pecking order hypothesis explain the dividend payout ratios of firms in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25, 1127–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, R., Quigley, J. M., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2005). Agglomeration and the spatial distribution of creativity. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, D. J. (1989). The cost of capital and the imputation tax system. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 16(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2005 report on high-expectation entrepreneurship. London/Babson Park, MA: London Business School/Babson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2007). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2007 global report on high growth entrepreneurship. Wellesley, MA/London: Babson College/London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awang, A., Khalid, S. A., Yusof, A. A., Kassim, K. M., Ismail, M., Zain, R. S., & Sintha Madar, A. R. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance relations of Malaysian Bumiputera SMEs: The impact of some perceived environmental factors. International Journal of Business and Management., 4(9), 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Latent entrepreneurship across nations. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 680–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., & Lambooy, J. (1999). Evolutionary economics and economic geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 411–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosma, N., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2009). GEM executive report 2008. Babson College, Universidad del Desarrollo, and Global Entrepreneurship Research Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entre-preneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilli, S., & Elert, N. (2016). The diversity of entrepreneurial regimes in Europe. 14th Interdisciplinary European Conference on Entrepreneurship Research, Chur, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation of the grades of U.S. high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillis, I. (2000). Being creative at the marketing/entrepreneurship interface: Lessons from the art. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 2, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillis, I. (2004). The entrepreneurial artist as marketer: Drawing from the smaller-firm literature. The International Journal of Arts Management, 7, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillis, I., & Rentschler, R. (2005). Using creativity to achieve an enrepreneurial future for arts marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10(4), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2005). Chapter 7: Trade-off and pecking order theories of debt. In E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance, Handbooks in finance series. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galwey, N. W. (2006). Introduction to mixed modelling: Beyond regression and analysis of variance. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (2003). Taxes and corporate finance: A review. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(4), 1075–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo, I., & Thurik, R. (2005). Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some recent developments. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(4), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A. (2011). Cultural entrepreneurship. Austrian Economics, 24(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Saria-Allende, V., & Sulla, V. (2002, December). Small- and medium-size enterprise financing in Eastern Europe. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., & Weaver, K. M. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial scale: A multi –country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, K. (2011). Artists entrepreneurs. In M. Sherdin & I. Zander (Eds.), Art entrepreneurship (pp. 10–22). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mato, D. (2009). All industries are cultural. Cultural Studies, 23(1), 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, K. (2007). The determinants of capital structure choice: Evidence from polish companies. International Atlantic Economic Society, 13, 495–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisiek, S., & Haefliger, S. (2011). Inviting the unexpected: Entrepreneurship and the arts. In M. Sherdin & I. Zander (Eds.), Art entrepreneurship (pp. 78–97). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2009). From creative to cultural industries. Cultural Studies, 23(1), 88–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review, 53, 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moureau, N., & Sagot-Duvauroux, D. (2010). Le marchĂ© de l’art contemporain. Paris: La DĂ©couverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulendran, S., Speed, R., & Widing, R. E., II. (2000). The antecedents and consequences of market orientation in Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan, V. (2002). A rational justification of the pecking order hypothesis to the choice of sources of financing. Management Research News, 25, 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., & Chin, N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: Data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherdin, M., & Zander, I. (Eds.). (2011). Art entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söndermann, M. (2010). Definition of cultural industries within the TF3 framework. European Commission: European Competitiveness Report 2010: An integrated Industrial Policy for the Globalisation Era. Putting Competitiveness and Sustainability at Front Stage. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Benedetto, A. D., & Nason, R. W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2012). Regional determinants of entrepreneurial activities – theories and empirical design. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development. National and regional perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, A., & Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exporing the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega, 24(6), 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szerb, L., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Ortega-ArgilĂ©s, R., & KomlĂłsi, É. (2013). REDI: The regional entrepreneurship and development index – measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, R. A., Jr. (1985). Effects of regulation on utility financing: Theory and evidence. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33(3), 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., & Morgan, N. A. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of market orientation in chartered surveying firms. Construction Management and Economics, 20(4), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Integrating technological, market and organisational change. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship: A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecco, M., & Srakar, A. (2017). Nascent cultural and creative entrepreneurship: Between entrepreneurial economics and institutional entrepreneurship. In A. C. Moreira, J. G. Dantas, & F. M. Valente (Eds.), Nascent entrepreneurship and successful new venture creation. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrej Srakar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Srakar, A., Vecco, M. (2018). Enhancing the Potential of Cultural Entrepreneurship: Connecting Regional Development and Performance of Cultural Firms in Europe. In: Innerhofer, E., Pechlaner, H., Borin, E. (eds) Entrepreneurship in Culture and Creative Industries. FGF Studies in Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65506-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics