Skip to main content

Limit Cycle Oscillation Amplitude Tailorng Based on Describing Functions and \(\mu \) Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Freeplay is a nonlinearity commonly encountered in aeroservoelastic applications which is known to cause Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs), limited amplitude flutter phenomena not captured by a linear analysis. Uncertainties in the models are also known to play an important role in triggering instabilities which might not be present in the nominal case, or altering their features in an unpredictable way. This paper shows the process to build a framework to study the nonlinear behavior of a typical section affected by a freeplay in the control surface and uncertainties in its parameters’ values. Starting from the definition of the nominal aeroelastic model, the nonlinear framework is implemented by means of the Describing Function (DF) method and robust analysis is introduced by means of \(\mu \) technique. In addition, it is shown an idea to perform a tailoring of the LCO graph of the system with the practical goal to limit the oscillation amplitude. Implications and advantages of using DF and \(\mu \) as primary tools are highlighted, and prowess of the methodology is showcased with an example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: 1st International modal analysis conference

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson MR (1998) Pilot-induced oscillations involving multiple nonlinearities. J Guid Control Dyn 21(5):786–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldelli DH, Lind RC, Brenner M (2005) Robust aeroservoelastic match-point solutions using describing function method. J Aircr 42(6):1597–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bisplinghoff RL, Ashley H (1962) Principles of aeroelasticity. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Borglund D (2004) The \(\mu \)-k method for robust flutter solutions. J Aircr 41(5):1209–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conner MD, Tang DM, Dowell EH, Virgin LN (1997) Nonlinear behavior of a typical airfoil section with control surface freeplay: a numerical and experimental study. J Fluids Struct 11(1):89–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Danowsky B, Thompson PM, Kukreja S (2013) Nonlinear analysis of aeroservoelastic models with free play using describing functions. J Aircr 50(2):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dowell E, Edwards J, Strganac T (2003) Nonlinear aeroelasticity. J Aircr 40(5)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelb A, Vander Velde WE (1968) Multiple-input describing functions and nonlinear system design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon JT, Meyer EE, Minogue RL (2008) Nonlinear stability analysis of control surface flutter with freeplay effects. J Aircr 45(6):1904–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hodges DH, Pierce GA (2011) Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, 2nd edn. Cambridge aerospace series. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Iannelli A, Marcos A, Lowenberg M (2016) comparison of aeroelastic modeling and robust flutter analysis of a typical section. In: IFAC ACA, August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iannelli A, Marcos A, Lowenberg M (2016) Modeling and robust body freedom flutter analysis of flexible aircraft configurations. In: IEEE MSC, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karpel M (1981) Design for active and passive flutter suppression and gust alleviation. Technical report 3482, NASA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khalil HK (1996) Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kotikalpudi A, Pfifer H, Seiler P (2016) Sensitivity of robust flutter boundary to model uncertainties in aeroservoelastic systems. In: AIAA Scitech, January 2016

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lind R, Brenner M (2012) Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis. Advances in industrial control. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu L, Dowell EH (2005) Harmonic balance approach for an airfoil with a freeplay control surface. AIAA J 43(4):802–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Packard A, Doyle J (1993) The complex structured singular value. Automatica 29(1)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pitt DM, Bansal P (2014) Uncertainties in control surface free-play and structural properties and their effect on flutter and LCO. In: AIAA Scitech conference, January 2014

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shukla H, Patil M (2016) Control of limit cycle oscillation amplitudes in nonlinear aerelastic systems using nonlinear normal modes. In: AIAA Scitech conference, January 2016

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tang D, Dowell EH, Virgin LN (1998) Limit cycle behavior of an airfoil with a control surface. J Fluids Struct 12(7):839–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Theodorsen T (1935) General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. Technical report 496, Naca

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wiggins P (2003) Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K (1996) Robust and optimal control. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 636307, project FLEXOP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Iannelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Iannelli, A., Marcos, A., Lowenberg, M. (2018). Limit Cycle Oscillation Amplitude Tailorng Based on Describing Functions and \(\mu \) Analysis. In: Dołęga, B., Głębocki, R., Kordos, D., Żugaj, M. (eds) Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65282-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65283-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics