Abstract
Freeplay is a nonlinearity commonly encountered in aeroservoelastic applications which is known to cause Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs), limited amplitude flutter phenomena not captured by a linear analysis. Uncertainties in the models are also known to play an important role in triggering instabilities which might not be present in the nominal case, or altering their features in an unpredictable way. This paper shows the process to build a framework to study the nonlinear behavior of a typical section affected by a freeplay in the control surface and uncertainties in its parameters’ values. Starting from the definition of the nominal aeroelastic model, the nonlinear framework is implemented by means of the Describing Function (DF) method and robust analysis is introduced by means of \(\mu \) technique. In addition, it is shown an idea to perform a tailoring of the LCO graph of the system with the practical goal to limit the oscillation amplitude. Implications and advantages of using DF and \(\mu \) as primary tools are highlighted, and prowess of the methodology is showcased with an example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: 1st International modal analysis conference
Anderson MR (1998) Pilot-induced oscillations involving multiple nonlinearities. J Guid Control Dyn 21(5):786–791
Baldelli DH, Lind RC, Brenner M (2005) Robust aeroservoelastic match-point solutions using describing function method. J Aircr 42(6):1597–1605
Bisplinghoff RL, Ashley H (1962) Principles of aeroelasticity. Wiley, New York
Borglund D (2004) The \(\mu \)-k method for robust flutter solutions. J Aircr 41(5):1209–1216
Conner MD, Tang DM, Dowell EH, Virgin LN (1997) Nonlinear behavior of a typical airfoil section with control surface freeplay: a numerical and experimental study. J Fluids Struct 11(1):89–109
Danowsky B, Thompson PM, Kukreja S (2013) Nonlinear analysis of aeroservoelastic models with free play using describing functions. J Aircr 50(2):329–336
Dowell E, Edwards J, Strganac T (2003) Nonlinear aeroelasticity. J Aircr 40(5)
Gelb A, Vander Velde WE (1968) Multiple-input describing functions and nonlinear system design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Gordon JT, Meyer EE, Minogue RL (2008) Nonlinear stability analysis of control surface flutter with freeplay effects. J Aircr 45(6):1904–1916
Hodges DH, Pierce GA (2011) Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, 2nd edn. Cambridge aerospace series. Cambridge University Press, New York
Iannelli A, Marcos A, Lowenberg M (2016) comparison of aeroelastic modeling and robust flutter analysis of a typical section. In: IFAC ACA, August 2016
Iannelli A, Marcos A, Lowenberg M (2016) Modeling and robust body freedom flutter analysis of flexible aircraft configurations. In: IEEE MSC, September 2016
Karpel M (1981) Design for active and passive flutter suppression and gust alleviation. Technical report 3482, NASA
Khalil HK (1996) Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Kotikalpudi A, Pfifer H, Seiler P (2016) Sensitivity of robust flutter boundary to model uncertainties in aeroservoelastic systems. In: AIAA Scitech, January 2016
Lind R, Brenner M (2012) Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis. Advances in industrial control. Springer, London
Liu L, Dowell EH (2005) Harmonic balance approach for an airfoil with a freeplay control surface. AIAA J 43(4):802–815
Packard A, Doyle J (1993) The complex structured singular value. Automatica 29(1)
Pitt DM, Bansal P (2014) Uncertainties in control surface free-play and structural properties and their effect on flutter and LCO. In: AIAA Scitech conference, January 2014
Shukla H, Patil M (2016) Control of limit cycle oscillation amplitudes in nonlinear aerelastic systems using nonlinear normal modes. In: AIAA Scitech conference, January 2016
Tang D, Dowell EH, Virgin LN (1998) Limit cycle behavior of an airfoil with a control surface. J Fluids Struct 12(7):839–858
Theodorsen T (1935) General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. Technical report 496, Naca
Wiggins P (2003) Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos. Springer, New York
Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K (1996) Robust and optimal control. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River
Acknowledgements
This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 636307, project FLEXOP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Iannelli, A., Marcos, A., Lowenberg, M. (2018). Limit Cycle Oscillation Amplitude Tailorng Based on Describing Functions and \(\mu \) Analysis. In: Dołęga, B., Głębocki, R., Kordos, D., Żugaj, M. (eds) Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65283-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65282-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65283-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)