Skip to main content

Reliability of Composite Marine Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Durability of Composites in a Marine Environment 2

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 245))

Abstract

Traditional engineering design takes a deterministic view of the world. This type of analysis has provided a safe method for designing structures for many years. However, reliability analyses have been developed to account for the stochastic loads encountered in service and the variation in geometries and material properties seen after production. There are a range of techniques available for this analysis each with their own advantages and disadvantages. This chapter explores methods for composite analysis using simplified methods and simulation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sobey AJ, Blake JIR, Shenoi RA (2013) Monte Carlo reliability analysis of tophat stiffened composite plate structures under out of plane loading. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 110:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaspar B, Naess A, Leira BJ, Guedes Soares C (2002) System reliability analysis of stiffened panel under combined uniaxial compression and lateral pressure loads. Struct Saf 39:30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaspar B, Guedes Soares C (2013) Hull girder reliability using a Monte Carlo based simulation method. Probab Eng Mech 31(1):66–75

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zayed A, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2013) Time variant reliability assessment of ship structures with fast integration techniques. Probab Eng Mech 32(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zayed A, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2013) Reliability of ship hulls subjected to corrosion and maintenance. Struct Saf 43(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taflanidis AA, Vetter C, Loukogeorgaki E (2013) Impact of modeling and excitation uncertainties on operational and structural reliability of tension leg platforms. Appl Ocean Res 43(1):131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva JE, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C (2014) Reliability assessment of a steel plate subjected to distributed and localized corrosion wastage. Eng Struct 59(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luís RM, Teixeira AP, Guedes Soares C (2009) Longitudinal strength reliability of a tanker hull accidentally grounded. Struct Saf 31(1):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Decò A, Frangopol DM, Zhu B (2012) Reliability and redundancy assessment of ships under different operational conditions. Eng Struct 42(1):457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobey AJ, Blake JIR, Shenoi RA (2014) A rapid method for reliability analysis of composite tophat stiffened structures using a first principles method and design rules. Trans R Inst Nav Archit—Int J Marit Eng 156:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sriramula S, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2009) Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 40(11):1673–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanchard JMFA, Sobey AJ, Blake JIR (2016) Assessing the feasibility of natural composite for structural applications. In: 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moan T, Berge S (1997) Design Principles and Criteria, International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress Committee IV.1, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moan T, Berge S (1997) Structural Design of Floating Production Systems, International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress Committee V.6, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keese DL, Barton WR (1982) Risk assessment and its application to flight safety analysis. In Sandia National Laboratories, SAND89

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soden PD, Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ (2004) Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. Compos Sci Technol 64:589–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zinoviev PA, Lebedeva OV, Tairova LP (2002) A coupled analysis of experimental and theoretical results on the deformation and failure of composite laminates under a state of plane stress. Compos Sci Technol 62:1711–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuraishi A, Tsai SW, Liu KKS (2002) A progressive quadratic failure criterion, Part b. Compos Sci Technol 62:1683–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Puck A, Schurnmann H (2002) Failure analysis of frp laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 62:1633–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vedeler G (1945) Grillage beams in ships and similar structures. Grondahl & Son

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sobey AJ, Blake JIR, Shenoi RA (2013) Implications of failure criteria choices on the rapid concept design of composite grillage structures using multiobjective optimisation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 47:735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarkson J (1965) The elastic analysis of flat grillages. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. Datoo MH (1991) Mechanics of fibrous composites. Elsevier Applied Science, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang N, Das PK, Yao XL (2010) Reliability analysis of stiffened composite panel. In: Asranet Conference, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mutlu U, Sobey AJ, Blake JIR, (2016) Multi scale reliability approach to analyse composite marine structures. In: 2nd International Conference on Safety and Reliability of Ships, Offshore and Subsea Structures SAROSS 2016, Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun CVR (1996) Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element. Compos Sci Technol 57:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel IM, Lee JW (1990) Progressive transverse cracking of crossplycomposite laminates. J Compos Mater 24:1225–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun CT, Zhou SG (1988) Failure of quasi-isotropic composite laminates with free edges. J Reinf Plast Compos 7:515–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Lloyd’s Register (2015) Lloyd’s Register Rules and Regulations-Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Special Service Craft, Rulefinder Ver 9.23 (Jan 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blanchard JMFA, Sobey AJ, Blake JIR (2016) Multi-scale investigation into the mechanical behaviour of flax in yarn, cloth and laminate form. Compos B 84:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yan L (2012) Effect of alkali treatment on vibration characteristics and mechanical properties of natural fabric reinforced composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 31(13):887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tekalur SA, Shivakumar K, Shukla A (2008) Mechanical behavior and damage evolution in E-glass vinyl ester and carbon composites subjected to static and blast loads. Compos B Eng 39:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nijhof AHJ (1993) Analysis of laminated composites. In: Shenoi RA, Wellicome JF (eds) Composite materials in maritime structures: Fundamental Aspects, vol 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhan JP (2010) Review and verification of marine riser analysis programs : global response analysis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology thesis

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pham DC, Su Z, Sridhar N, Qian X, Huang Z, Sobey AJ, Shenoi, RA (2016) Experimental and numerical studies of large-scaled filament wound T700/X4201 composite risers under bending. In: 17th European Conference on Composite Materials, 2016, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  37. Philippidis TP, Lekou DJ, Aggelis DG (1999) Mechanical property distribution of CFRP filament wound composites. Compos Struct 45(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Malmstein M, Chambers AR, Blake JIR (2013) Hygrothermal ageing of plant oil based marine composites. Compos Struct 101:138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zafar A, Bertocco F, Schjodt-Thomsen F, Rauhe JC (2012) Investigation of the long term effects of moisture on carbon fibre and epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 72:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Sobey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sobey, A.J., Blake, J.I.R., Shenoi, R.A. (2018). Reliability of Composite Marine Structures. In: Davies, P., Rajapakse, Y. (eds) Durability of Composites in a Marine Environment 2. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65145-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65145-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65144-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65145-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics