Skip to main content

Critical Reflections on Laboratory Wear Tests for Ranking Commercial Cathode Materials in Aluminium Cells

  • Chapter
Light Metals 2013

Abstract

The lifetime of high amperage cells with graphitized carbon cathodes is mainly determined by cathode wear. Several attempts have been made to investigate cathode wear in laboratory test cells, but the underlying mechanism is still a matter of discussion. This is reflected in the fact that test methods enabling the ranking of different commercial cathode materials are still to be developed. In the present paper we report on a laboratory test cell where the cathode is directly exposed to the electrolyte, which accelerates the wear rate by an order of magnitude relative to the wear rate in industrial cells. In this study three different commercial carbon cathode materials have been tested; graphitized carbon, high density graphitized carbon, and anthracitic carbon. No significant differences in wear rate could be detected under the test conditions used. Possible reasons for this unexpected result are discussed, and suggestions for modifications of the test cell are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H.A. Øye and B.J Welch, JOM 1998, pp. 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Sørlie and H. A. Øye, “Cathodes in Aluminum Electrolysis” Düsseldorf, Germany: Aluminum Verlag, 2nd ed., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Reny and S. Wilkening, Light Metals 2000, pp. 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Skybakmoen, S. Rørvik, A. Solheim, K. R. Holm, P. Tiefenbach, and Ø. Østrem, Light Metals 2011, pp. 1061–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Solheim, MetSoc’s Annual Conference of Metallurgists (COM 2011), Montreal, Canada, 2–5 October, 2011 (Proceedings, pp. 135/42).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Lombard, T. Béhérégaray, B. Fève, and J. M. Jolas, Light Metals 1998, pp. 653–658.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Rødseth, B. Rasch, Ole Lund, and J. Thonstad, Light Metals 2002, pp. 883–887.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Ødegård, Å. Sterten, and J. Thonstad, Light Metals 1987, pp. 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. P. Moxnes, A. Solheim, T. Store, B. E. Aga, and L. Støen, Light Metals 2006, pp. 285/90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Skybakmoen, A. P. Ratvik, A. Solheim, S. Rolseth, and H. Gudbrandsen, Light Metals 2007, pp. 815–820.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Rafiei, F. Hiltmann, M. Hyland, B. James, and B. Welch, Light Metals 2001, pp. 747–752.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Patel, M. Hyland, and F. Hiltmann, Light Metals 2005, pp. 757–762.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Patel, M. Hyland, and F. Hiltmann, Light Metals 2006, pp. 633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Sato, P. Patel, and P. Lavoie, Light Metals 2010, pp. 817–822.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Patel. Y. Sato, and P. Lavoie, Light Metals 2011, pp. 1073–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Vasshaug, T. Foosnæs, G. M. Haarberg, A. P. Ratvik, and E. Skybakmoen, Light Metals 2007, pp. 821–826.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Vasshaug, T. Foosnaæs, G. M. Haarberg, A. P. Ratvik, and E. Skybakmoen, Light Metals 2009, pp. 1111–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Tschöpe, A. Støre, S. Rørvik, A. Solheim, T. Grande, and A. P. Ratvik, MetSoc’s Annual Conference of Metallurgists (COM 2011), Montreal, Canada, 2–5 October, 2011 (Proceedings, pp. 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Tschöpe, A. Støre, S. Rørvik, A. Solheim, E. Skybakmoen, T. Grande, and A. P. Ratvik, Light Metals 2012, pp. 1349–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Tschöpe, A. Store, A. Solheim, E. Skybakmoen, T. Grande and A.P. Ratvik, to be published in JOM.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. P. Ratvik, A. Store, A. Solheim, and T. Foosnæs, Light Metals 2008, pp. 973–978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Novak, K. Tschöpe, A.P. Ratvik and T. Grande, Light Metals 2013 (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Barry A. Sadler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tschöpe, K., Støre, A., Skybakmoen, E., Solheim, A., Grande, T., Ratvik, A.P. (2016). Critical Reflections on Laboratory Wear Tests for Ranking Commercial Cathode Materials in Aluminium Cells. In: Sadler, B.A. (eds) Light Metals 2013. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65136-1_211

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics