Skip to main content

Causal Attribution of Behavior and Achievement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motivation and Action

Abstract

People have a fundamental need to understand, predict, and control their environment. Causal attributions are extremely important for this. Without knowing the causes for a behavior or event, it becomes unpredictable whether it will occur again and how it might be influenced. This chapter will first introduce the topic by presenting Weiner’s attribution theory of motivation, emotion, and behavior before describing the process of causal attribution. For this purpose, the chapter will explain when and how intensively people search for causes and how they attribute them to events. Both normative and descriptive models of causal attribution will be discussed. The third part of the chapter will then talk about the effects of causal attribution on motivation, emotion, and behavior. Concretely, the chapter will describe their influence on learning and performance, the development of depressive symptoms, as well as aggressive behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 108, 441–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Whitehouse, W. G., Hogan, M. E., Panzarella, C., & Rose, D. T. (2006). Prospective incidence of first onsets an recurrences for depression in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 145–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. C. (1988). Psychological functioning and depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 97–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression – Causes and treatment. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1965). Structure and direction in thinking. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, H., & Blair, I. (1992). An attribution-emotion model of violence in conflict situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., & Niemelä, P. (Eds.). (1992). Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brees, J. R., Mackey, J., & Martinko, M. J. (2013). An attributional perspective of aggression in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 252–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, W. R. (1969). The role of surprise in cognitive development. In D. Elkind & J. H. Flavell (Eds.), Studies in cognitive development (pp. 257–314). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990a). Where is the bias in causal attribution? In K. J. Gilholey, M. T. K. Kayne, R. H. Logie, & G. Erdos (Eds.), Lines of thinking (pp. 181–197). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1990b). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chodkiewicz, A. R., & Boyle, C. (2014). Exploring the contribution of attribution retraining to student perceptions and the learning process. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30, 78–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., Dallaire, D. H., Jacques, F. M., Pineda, A. Q., LaGrange, B., Truss, A. E., Folmer, A. S., Tilghman-Osborne, C., & Felton, J. W. (2008). Emergence of attributional style and its relation to depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 16–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., & Gotlib, I. C. H. (1983). The role of cognitions in depression: A critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 472–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). Causal attributions for personal events of varying magnitudes. Journal of Personality, 43, 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., & Galfe, E. (2004). Besser als …, schlechter als … – Leistungsbezogene Vergleichsprozesse in der Grundschule. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 36, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2000). Geschlechtsunterschiede im Lern- und Leistungsverhalten am Computer: Ein theoretischer Rahmen. In F. Försterling, J. Stiensmeier-Pelster, & L. Silny (Eds.), Kognitive und emotionale Aspekte der Motivation (pp. 53–76). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Erlernte Hilflosigkeit am Computer? Geschlechtsunterschiede in computerspezifischen Attributionen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, T., Ruble, D. N., & Zambarano, R. (1989). Mothers’ implicit theories of discipline: Child effects, parent effects, and the attribution process. Child Development, 60, 1373–1391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1993). Social-cognitive mechanism in the development of conduct disorder and depression. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 559–584.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Coie, J., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Social, emotional and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 719–788). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Essays in social psychology (Vol. 195). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, G., & Rush, A. J. (1984). Cognitive patterns in symptomatic and remitted unipolar major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 31–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1987). Konzepte von Kausalität. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K. (1982). Causal schemata: Review and criticism of research on a popular construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1001–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Försterling, F. (1989). Models of covariation and attribution: How do they relate to the analogy of analysis of variance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 615–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Försterling, F. (2001). Attribution. An introduction to theories, research and applications. Hove East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Försterling, F., Bühner, F., & Gall, S. (1998). Attributions of depressed persons: How consistent are they with the covariation principle? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1047–1061.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1994). Emotional intelligence. London, UK: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Hudley, C., & Williams, E. (1992). Attributional and emotional determinants of aggression among African-American and Latino young adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 28, 731–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Taylor, A. Z. (2016). Attribution theory and motivation in school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 11–33). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Taylor, A. Z., & Hudley, C. (2015). A motivational intervention for African-American boys labeled as aggressive. Urban Education, 50, 194–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Weiner, B., & Benesh-Weiner, M. (1995). An attributional analysis of the development of excuse giving in aggressive and nonaggressive African American boys. Developmental Psychology, 31, 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Weiner, B., Cobb, M., & Henderson, T. (2001). An attributional analysis of child abuse among low-income African American mothers. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. L. (1980). Intuitive psychologist or intuitive lawyer? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 767–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R. D., & Stonner, D. M. (1978). Attributes and attributions: Inferring stimulus properties, actors’ dispositions, and causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 657–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. (deutsch 1977: Psychologie der interpersonalen Beziehungen. Stuttgart: Klett).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hiroto, D. W., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, D. M. (1995). Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: Retesting the hopelessness model of depression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., & Larrance, D. T. (1979). Is a ‘refinement’ if attribution theory necessary to accommodate the learned helplessness reformulation? A critique of the reformulation of Abramson, Seligman & Teasdale. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 681–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1976). How do people perceive the causes of behavior? American Scientist, 64, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative appraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 387–420). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Worchel, S., Goethals, G. R., & Grumet, J. F. (1971). Prior expectancy and behavioral extremity as determinants of attitude attribution. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 7, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. C. (1973). Self- and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theories versus consistency theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 185–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kammer, D., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1987). Depressive Attribuierung. Eine Standortbestimmung. In M. Ameland (Ed.), Bericht über den 35. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Heidelberg (Vol. 2, pp. 557–566). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln, OR: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. New York, NY: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. New York, NY: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1981). Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state vs. action orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1983). Motivation, Konflikt und Handlungskontrolle. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (2003). Handlungs- und Lageorientierung: Wie man lernt, seine Gefühle zu steuern? In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuhl, J. E. R., Crowe, D. H., & Kahan, J. P. (1975). Causal attribution for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, S. (2004). Erfolg im Verkauf – Entwicklung und Evaluation eines kognitiv-behavioralen Trainings. Dissertation, Universität Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1980). Information acquisition and attribution processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1010–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 23–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F. (2004). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Cairns, L., Relich, J., Barnes, J., & Debus, R. L. (1984). The relationship between dimensions of self-attribution and dimension of self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. A. (1972). The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. A. (1976). The lesser influence of consensus than distinctiveness information on causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 733–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G. I., Halberstadt, L. J., & Abramson, L. Y. (1987). Vulnerability to depressive mood reactions: Toward a more powerful test of the diatheses-stress and causal mediation components of the reformulated theory of depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 386–393.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metalsky, G. I., Joiner, T. E., Hardin, T. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (1993). Depressive reactions to failure in a naturalistic setting: A test of the hopelessness and self-esteem theories of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 101–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W. U. (2000). Gelernte Hilflosigkeit. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W.-U. (1973). Leistungsmotiv und Ursachenerklärung von Erfolg und Mißerfolg. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W.-U. (1988). Die Rolle von Überraschung im Attributionsprozeß. Psychologische Rundschau, 39, 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W. U., & Niepel, M. (1994). Surprise. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. Orlando, FL: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W.-U., Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schützwohl, A. (1991). An experimental analysis of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, W.-U., Schützwohl, A., & Reisenzein, R. (1993). Einführung in die Emotionspsychologie (Vol. 1). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (1976). Ego involvement and attribution for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 901–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monson, T. C., & Snyder, M. (1977). Actors, observers, and the attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., Borgida, E., Crandall, R., & Reed, H. (1976). Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. In J. Carroll & J. Payne (Eds.), Cognitive and social behavior (pp. 113–133). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, L. R., & Cheng, P. W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111, 455–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orvis, B. R., Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). A closer examination of causal inference: The role of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 605–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1984). Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression: Theory and evidence. Psychological Review, 91, 347–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). The attributional style questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, P. (2002). Nutzung von Kovariationsinformationen im Attributionsprozess. Ein Vergleich depressiver und nichtdepressiver Erwachsener. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Gießen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppe, P., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Pelster, A. (2005). Attributionsstilfragebogen für Erwachsene (ASF-E). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. J., & Insko, C. A. (1980). Extension of the Kelley attribution model: The role of comparison-object consensus, target-object consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyszczynski, T. A., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypotheses-testing model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raps, C. S., Peterson, C., Reinhard, K. E., Abramson, L. Y., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1982). Attributional style among depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 102–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeder, G. D. (2009). Mindreading: Judgments about intentionality and motives in dispositional inference. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rethorst, S. (1994). Attribution und Emotion in der sportpsychologischen Forschung. In F. Försterling & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Attributionstheorie (pp. 163–183). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (1975). Zeitstabilität und Steuerbarkeit von Ursachen schulischer Leistung in der Sicht des Lehrers. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 7, 180–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (1980). Leistungsbewertung und Lernmotivation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F. (2001). Bezugsnormorientierung. In D. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 55–62). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, R. M. (1972). A dimensional analysis of the perceived causes of success and failure. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his short-comings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Feldman, N. S. (1976). Order of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information and causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 930–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Weiner, B., & Greitmeyer, T. (2004). Responsibility and help-giving: A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 815–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, U., & Tscharaktschiew, N. (2014). An attributional analysis of moral emotions: Naïve scientists and everyday judges. Emotion Review, 6, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R. (1994). Kausalattributionen als gesundheitsbezogene Kognitionen. In F. Försterling & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Attributionstheorie. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1982). Selbstwertdienliche Attributionen nach Leistungsrückmeldungen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 14, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Abramson, L. Y., Semmel, A., & von Baeyer, C. (1979). Depressive attributional style. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 242–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaklee, H. (1983). Causal schemata: Description or explanation of judgment processes? A reply to Fiedler. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1010–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L., & Jones, E. E. (1976). Defensive attribution and the Lelley cube. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 809–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1988). Erlernte Hilflosigkeit, Handlungskontrolle und Leistung. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1989). Attributional style and depressive mood reactions. Journal of Personality, 57, 581–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1995). Eine attributionale Analyse elterlichen Erziehungsverhaltens. In K. Pawlik (Ed.), Bericht über den 39. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (Vol. 2, pp. 445–450). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2004). Die Suche nach und das Nachdenken über Ursachen. Zur Veröffentlichung eingereichtes Manuskript, Universität Gießen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Assimi, S. (2002). Attributionale Analyse aggressiven Verhaltens bei Jungen und Mädchen. In M. Baumann, A. Keinath, & J. F. Krems (Eds.), Experimentelle Psychologie (p. 65). Regensburg, Germany: Roderer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Gerlach, H. (1997). Aggressives Verhalten bei Kindern und Jugendlichen aus attributionstheoretischer Sicht. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 11, 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Grüner, S. (2005). Reattributionsstraining: Ein Leitfaden. Zur Veröffentlichung eingereichtes Manuskript, Universität Gießen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Kammer, D., & Adolphs, J. (1988). Attributionsstil und Bewertung bei depressiven versus nichtdepressiven Patienten. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 17, 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Reisenzein, R., & Martini, A. (1995). The role of surprise in the attribution process. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Schürmann, M. (1991). Attributionsstil als Risikofaktor der depressiven Reaktion bei Kindern. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Schürmann, M., Eckert, C., & Pelster, A. (1994). Attributionsstil-Fragebogen für Kinder und Jugendliche (ASF-KJ). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & Schwinger, M. (2008). Kausalattribution. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 74–83). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W., Eagly, A. H., & Stroebe, M. S. (1977). Friendly or just polite? The effect of self-esteem on attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stupnisky, R. H., Steward, T. L., Daniels, L. M., & Perry, R. P. (2011). When do students ask why? Examining the precursors and outcomes of causal search among first-year college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharaktschiew, N., & Rudolph, U. (2015). The who and whom of help giving: An attributional model integrating the help giver and the help recipient. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Overwalle, F., & Heylighen, F. (1995). Relating covariation information to causal dimensions through principles of contrast and invariance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1982). The actor and the observer. How are their perceptions of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92, 682–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B (1974). Achievement motivation an attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985a). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985b). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 74–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1994). Sünde versus Krankheit. In F. Försterling & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Attributionspsychologie (pp. 1–25). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 135–155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Frieze, I. H., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S., & Rosenbaum, R. M. (1971). Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York, NY: General Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Harvey, J. H. (1977). Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., & Klauda, S. L. (2016). Expectancy-value theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 55–74). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Stiensmeier-Pelster .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., Heckhausen, H. (2018). Causal Attribution of Behavior and Achievement. In: Heckhausen, J., Heckhausen, H. (eds) Motivation and Action . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics