Abstract
For many years, various authors have postulated the possible existence of a right to be forgotten. The Court of Justice of the European Union in the landmark ruling in Google Spain v Costeja González (C 131/12) enacted a limited version of the right. Now the General Data Protection Rules includes a “right to erasure”. This article looks at the evolution of the right, paying special attention to its future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Lawrence (2016).
- 2.
Ardia (2010).
- 3.
As implemented by the Google Spain decision, see infra footnote 23.
- 4.
- 5.
Hornung and Schnabel (2009).
- 6.
Ibid.
- 7.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 281/31.
- 8.
Bygrave (2002).
- 9.
Bignami (2008).
- 10.
OBG Ltd v Allan and Douglas v Hello! [2008] 1 AC 1.
- 11.
Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22.
- 12.
Murray v Express Newspapers Ltd [2007] EWHC 1980 (Chancery Division); Abbey v Gilligan [2012] EWHC EWHC QB 3217; Vidal-Hall & Others v Google Inc [2014] EWHC QB 13.
- 13.
Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53.
- 14.
Google Inc v Vidal-Hall & Others [2015] EWCA Civil 311.
- 15.
Charlesworth (2000).
- 16.
Werro (2009).
- 17.
Balkam (2014).
- 18.
Mayer-Schönberger (2009).
- 19.
AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC QB 3454 (TCC).
- 20.
For obvious reasons, her identity is kept hidden in the proceedings.
- 21.
Cobia (2008).
- 22.
Szekely (2014).
- 23.
Google Spain v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos and Mario Costeja González, case C131/12, 13.05.2014. ECLI:EU:C:2014:317.
- 24.
A technical act performed either by a search engine as in the case of the Google Spain case, or by a web archiving crawler.
- 25.
The Advocate General provides an opinion before the decision, the court can decide to follow it, rely on it, or ignore it (Jääskinen 2013).
- 26.
Spauwen and van Den Brink (2014).
- 27.
Ibid.
- 28.
Ibid.
- 29.
Google Spain, at 38.
- 30.
Search Removal Request Under Data Protection Law in Europe. https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch. Accessed 03 Nov 2016.
- 31.
Google (2014).
- 32.
When the report was first released in 2015, the figure stood at 58%.
- 33.
Ibid.
- 34.
Temkin (2003).
- 35.
Matthiesson (2010).
- 36.
Wikimedia Foundation (2016).
- 37.
Wikipedia https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temptation_Island. Accessed 02 Nov 2016.
- 38.
Wikipedia https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Duval. Accessed 02 Nov 2016.
- 39.
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Hutch. Accessed 02 Nov 2016.
- 40.
Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadia_Almada. Accessed 02 Nov 2016.
- 41.
Zittrain (2014).
- 42.
Guadamuz (2014a).
- 43.
Solon (2014).
- 44.
Rosen (2012).
- 45.
Parmar (2014).
- 46.
Fazlioglu (2013).
- 47.
Tréguer (2014).
- 48.
Tambini, et al. (2008).
- 49.
Open Letter to Google From 80 Internet Scholars: Release RTBF Compliance Data (2015), https://medium.com/@ellgood/open-letter-to-google-from-80-internet-scholars-release-rtbf-compliance-data-cbfc6d59f1bd#.mxjhd34sh . Accessed 02 Nov 2016.
- 50.
Ibid.
- 51.
Urban and Quilter (2006).
- 52.
Hole (2014).
- 53.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119/1.
- 54.
Lee (2014).
- 55.
Youtube (2014) https://youtu.be/rEwf4sDgxHo. Accessed 03 Nov 2016.
- 56.
Curtis and Philipson (2014).
- 57.
Ibid.
- 58.
Tretikov (2014).
- 59.
Levine (2014).
- 60.
Lyons (2014).
- 61.
Sebastion (2015).
- 62.
Schneier (2015).
- 63.
Supra n 22.
- 64.
Ibid.
- 65.
Nissenbaum (2011).
- 66.
Supra n 22.
- 67.
Guadamuz (2014b).
References
Ardia DS (2010) Free speech savior or shield for scoundrels: an empirical study of intermediary immunity under section 230 of the communications decency act. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev 43(2):373–506
Balkam S (2014) The Right to Remember, Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-balkam/the-right-to-remember_b_5338223.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Bignami F (2008) The case for tolerant constitutional patriotism: the right to privacy before the European courts. Cornell Int Law J 41(2):211–249
Bygrave LA (2002) Data protection law: approaching its rationale, logic and limits. Kluwer Law International, London
Charlesworth A (2000) Clash of the data Titans? US and EU data privacy regulation. Eur Public Law 6(2):253–274
Cobia J (2008) Digital millennium copyright act takedown notice procedure: misuses, abuses, and shortcomings of the process. Minn J Law Sci Technol 10(1):387–411
Curtis S, Philipson A (2014) Wikipedia Founder: EU’s Right to be Forgotten is ‘Deeply Immoral’. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/11015901/EU-ruling-on-link-removal-deeply-immoral-says-Wikipedia-founder.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Fazlioglu M (2013) Forget me not: the clash of the night to be forgotten and freedom of expression on the internet. Int Data Priv Law 3(3):149–157
Google (2014) Google Transparency Report for European Privacy Requests for Search Removals. https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/europeprivacy/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Google Spain v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos and Mario Costeja González, case C131/12, 13.05.2014. ECLI:EU:C:2014:317
Guadamuz A (2014a) Developments in intermediary liability. In: Savin A, Trzaskowski J (eds) Research handbook On EU internet law. Edward Elgar, p 132
Guadamuz A (2014b) You have the right to be forgotten. Technollama Blog. http://www.technollama.co.uk/you-have-the-right-to-be-forgotten. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Hole J (2014) Do you have the right to be forgotten?. State of Digital. http://www.stateofdigital.com/right-to-be-forgotten/. Accessed 02 Nov 2016
Hornung G, Schnabel C (2009) Data protection in Germany I: the population census decision and the right to informational self-determination. Comput Law Secur Rev 25(1):84–88. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2008.11.002
Jääskinen (2013) Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen, Case C‑131/12 Google Spain SL Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) Mario Costeja González. Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain), Curia, 25.06.2013
Lawrence D (2016) The journalist and the troll: this man spent two years trying to destroy me online. Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-benjamin-wey/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Lee D (2014) BBC to Publish ‘Right to be Forgotten’ Removals List. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-29658085. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Levine D (2014) The MH17 Disaster Demonstrates the Dangers of “Right to be Forgotten”. Slate Future Tense. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/07/22/mh17_investigation_and_the_right_to_be_forgotten.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Luhmann N (1995) Social systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Lyons D (2014) Right to be forgotten? Forget About it. Tech Policy Daily. http://www.techpolicydaily.com/technology/right-forgotten-forget/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Matthiesson S (2010) Who’s afraid of the limelight? The Trafigura and Terry super-injunctions, and the subsequent fallout. J Media Law 2(2):153–167
Mayer-Schönberger V (2009) Delete. The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Nissenbaum H (2011) A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus J Am Acad Arts Sci 140(4):32–48
Open Letter to Google From 80 Internet Scholars: Release RTBF Compliance Data (2015), https://medium.com/@ellgood/open-letter-to-google-from-80-internet-scholars-release-rtbf-compliance-data-cbfc6d59f1bd#.mxjhd34sh. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Parmar M (2014) Memorialising 40 years since Idi Amin’s Expulsion: Digital “Memory Mania” to the “Right to be Forgotten”. South Asian Pop Cult 12(1):1–14
Rosen J (2012) The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Rev 64:88–92
Schneier B (2015) Data and Goliath: the hidden battles to collect your data and control your world. W.W. Norton & Company, London
Search Removal Request Under Data Protection Law in Europe. https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_eudpa?product=websearch. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Sebastion A (2015) The online right to be forgotten in the European justice evolution. Int J Manag Knowl Learn 4(1):59–68
Solon O (2014) People have the right to be forgotten, rules EU court. Wired UK. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/right-to-be-forgotten-blog. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Sørensen E, Triantafillou P (2016) The politics of self-governance. Routledge, Abingdon
Spauwen J, van den Brink J (2014) Dutch Google Spain ruling: more freedom of speech, less right to be forgotten for criminals. Inforrm’s Blog. https://inforrm.wordpress.com/2014/09/27/dutch-google-spain-ruling-more-freedom-of-speech-less-right-to-be-forgotten-for-criminals-joran-spauwenand-jens-van-den-brink/#more-27910
Szekely I (2014) The right to be forgotten and the new archival paradigm. In: Pereira A, Ghezzi A, Vesnić-Alujević L (eds) The ethics of memory in a digital age: interrogating the right to be forgotten. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 28–49
Tambini D, Leonardi D, Marsden CT (2008) Codifying cyberspace: communications self-regulation in the age of internet convergence. Routledge, London
Temkin J (2003) Rape and the legal process, 2nd edn. Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice, Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2230.2003.06606009_1.x
Tréguer F (2014) Right to be forgotten: with free expression under threat, Europe needs a ‘Marco Civil Moment’. Global Voices. https://globalvoices.org/2014/09/11/right-to-be-forgotten-with-free-expression-under-threat-europe-needs-a-marco-civil-moment/. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Tretikov L (2014) European court decision punches holes in free knowledge. Wikipedia Blog. http://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/06/european-court-decision-punches-holes-in-free-knowledge/. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Urban J, Quilter L (2006) Efficient process or “Chilling Effects”? Takedown notices under section 512 of the digital millennium copyright act. Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J 22(4):621–693
Werro F (2009) The right to inform v. the right to be forgotten: a transatlantic clash. In: Ciacchi AG et al (eds) Liability in the third millennium. FRG, Baden-Baden
Wikimedia Foundation (2016) Wikipedia, Notices received from search engines, https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Notices_received_from_search_engines
Youtube (2014) https://youtu.be/rEwf4sDgxHo. Accessed 3 Nov 2016
Zittrain J (2014) Don’t Force Google to “Forget”. The New York Times. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12921731. Accessed 2 Nov 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guadamuz, A. (2017). Developing a Right to be Forgotten. In: Synodinou, TE., Jougleux, P., Markou, C., Prastitou, T. (eds) EU Internet Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64955-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64955-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64954-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64955-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)