Skip to main content

Estidama Pearl Building Rating System of Abu Dhabi and Al Sa’fat of Dubai: Comparison and Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017) (ISBS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 7))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the built environment industry, sustainable building assessment systems provide a framework and tool to follow in order to embed sustainable development measures. While green building assessment systems are mostly focused on the environmental design and systems performance. To help developers, designers and construction stakeholders in defining the projects’ sustainability objectives and design indicators, two UAE-based sustainability regulations have been objectively assessed and major differences have been identified. A comparative analysis of (1) Estidama Pearl Building Rating System (PBRS) of Abu Dhabi and (2) Al Sa’fat of Dubai has been conducted. The analysis has been structured in accordance to an international standard; ISO/AWI 21929 Sustainability Indicators, and to another similar system; SBAT of South Africa. As construction is constantly increasing in the UAE and other developing countries, climate change impacts of buildings and adaptability measures need to be considered more frequently through such systems. In addition, the social aspect of sustainable development could be further supported by new building techniques suitable to the region. The local green building assessment systems should look at the life cycle analysis and operational phase assessment as they directly support the economic aspect of the stainability along with their environmental-social positive impact. It is expected that the results presented in this research can contribute to a better understanding in the field of sustainability regulations and environmental designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole RJ (2005) Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions. In: The 2005 world sustainable building conference, Tokyo, pp 1934–1939

    Google Scholar 

  2. Voinov A, Farley J (2006) Reconciling sustainability, systems theory and discounting. Ecol Econ 63:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castro MF, Mateus R, Braganca L (2014) A critical analysis of building sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildings. Environ Dev Sustain. doi:10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gibberd J (2002) The sustainable building assessment tool assessing how buildings can support sustainability in developing countries. Built Environ Prof Convention, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abu Dhabi urban planning council (2010) Pearl building rating system. Des Constr. Version 1.0, April

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubai municipality (2011) Green building regulations and specifications. www.dm.gov.ae. Accessed 10 Dec 2016

  7. Dubai municipality (2016) Al Sa’fat—Dubai green buildings evaluation system. www.dm.gov.ae. Accessed 10 Dec 2016

  8. Shareef SL, Altan H (2016) Building sustainability rating systems in the Middle East. Eng Sustain. doi:10.1680/jensu.16.00035

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization of Standardization (ISO) (2011) TS: ISO/TS 21929-1: 2011, sustainability in building construction—Sustainability indicators—part 1: framework for the development of indicators for buildings 2011 edition. ISO, Geneva, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berardi U (2011) Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings. Sustain Dev. doi:10.1002/sd.532

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fenner RA, Ryce T (2007) A comparative analysis of two building rating systems. Part 1: evaluation. Eng Sustain 161:55–63. doi:10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elgendy K (2010) Comparing Estidama’s pearls rating system to LEED and BREEAM. www.carboun.com/sustainable-urbanism/. Accessed 15 Dec 2016

  13. Emirates Green Building Council (2015) EmiratesGBC technical guidelines for retrofitting existing buildings. www.emiratesgbc.org/academy/emiratesgbc-technical-guidelines/. Accessed 22 Dec 2016

  14. Sinha A, Gupta R, Kutnar A (2013) Sustainable development and green buildings. Drv Ind 64(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krigsvoll G, Fumo M, Morbiducci R (2010) National and international standardization (International Organization for Standardization and European Committee for Standardization) relevant for sustainability in construction. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su2123777

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brophy V (2014) Building environmental assessment—a useful tool in the future delivery of holistic sustainability? In: The 2014 world sustainable building conference, Barcelona: Paper 119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omair Awadh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Awadh, O. (2018). Estidama Pearl Building Rating System of Abu Dhabi and Al Sa’fat of Dubai: Comparison and Analysis. In: Fırat, S., Kinuthia, J., Abu-Tair, A. (eds) Proceedings of 3rd International Sustainable Buildings Symposium (ISBS 2017). ISBS 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64349-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64349-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64348-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64349-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics