Abstract
Some researchers have attempted to tailor agile methods to comply with specific standards (e.g. SafeScrum and IEC61508). However, this risks over-configuring the agile method in such a way as to make it difficult to apply it to another safety standard. Our approach sought to look at the problems of addressing the more fundamental principles of safety assurance by adopting the 4+1 safety principles and investigating how a Scrum process challenges, and can be adapted to give strong indication that the practitioners felt that there is a significant potential for successful integration of the 4+1 principles within Scrum. There were some issues where practitioners were concerned to focus only on one safety standard, and neither the agile practitioners nor the safety practitioners had a clear understanding of the outlook and work of the other group. However, we used these issues to inform a further set of questions. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants to explore the general feasibility of the approach, and to provide an assessment as to whether the 4+1 principles can be addressed without compromising agility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bowers, J., May, J., Melander, E., Baarman, M., Ayoob, A.: Tailoring XP for large system mission critical software development. In: Wells, D., Williams, L. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2002. LNCS, vol. 2418, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_10
Bedoll, R.: A tail of two projects: how ‘Agile’ methods succeeded after ‘Traditional’ methods had failed in a critical system-development project. In: Maurer, F., Wells, D. (eds.) XP/Agile Universe 2003. LNCS, vol. 2753, pp. 25–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45122-8_4
Bruce, D.: Agile analysis practices for safety-critical, 19 February 2013 http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/agile-analysis-practicessafety-critical-development/
Kelly, T.: Software certification: where is confidence won and lost? In: Anderson, T., Dale, C. (eds.) Addressing Systems Safety Challenges, Safety Critical Systems Club (2014)
Doss, O., Kelly, T.P.: Challenges and opportunities in agile development in safety critical systems: a survey. SIGSOFT Software Eng. Notes 41(2), 30–31 (2016)
Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J., Sullivan, R.O., Brien, D.O.: Scaling agile methods to regulated environments: an industry case study. In: 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), San Francisco, CA, pp. 863–872 (2013)
Jonsson, H., Larsson, S., Punnekkat, S.: Agile practices in regulated railway software development. In: 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW), Dallas, TX, pp. 355–360 (2012)
Ge, X., Paige, R.F., McDermid, J.A.: An iterative approach for development of safety-critical software and safety arguments. In: Agile Conference, Florida, pp. 35–43 (2010)
Stålhane, T., Myklebust, T., Hanssen, G.: The application of Scrum IEC-61508 certifiable software (2011, Unpublished)
Beznosov, K., Kruchten, P.: Towards agile security assurance. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Workshop on New Security Paradigms (NSPW 2004), pp. 47–54. ACM, New York (2004)
Othmane, L.B., Angin, P., Bhargava, B.: Using assurance cases to develop iteratively security features using Scrum. In: 2014 Ninth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES), Fribourg, pp. 490–497 (2014)
Flink, A.: The Survey Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Shull, F., Singer, J., Sjøberg, D.I.K.: Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, 1st edn. Springer, London (2010)
Doss, O., Kelly, T.: The 4+1 principles of software safety assurance and their implications for Scrum. In: Sharp, H., Hall, T. (eds.) XP 2016. LNBIP, vol. 251, pp. 286–290. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_27
Azham, Z., Ghani, I., Ithnin, N.: Security backlog in Scrum security practices’. In: 5th Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering (MySEC), Johor Bahru, pp. 414–417 (2011)
Doss, O., Kelly, T.: Addressing the 4+1 software safety assurance principles within Scrum. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Workshop Proceedings of XP2016 (XP 2016 Workshops). ACM, New York (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doss, O., Kelly, T., Stålhane, T., Haugset, B., Dixon, M. (2017). Integration of the 4+1 Software Safety Assurance Principles with Scrum. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64217-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64218-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)