Abstract
People process and communicate information at multiple levels of abstraction when reading, talking, solving problems, designing and interacting with computers. For example, in reading an article, actors may focus on a letter, a word, a clause, a sentence or a paragraph. At any moment, they focus on a particular level of abstraction, do something, and, under certain conditions, move back and forth to other levels until the actors achieve their goal. Not moving between levels of abstraction when necessary, decreases performance. It follows that human-computer interaction should be designed accordingly, yet there is hardly any explicit mention of abstraction levels in studies or guidelines of designing HCI. In this talk, I propose a method for incorporating abstraction levels in the design of HCI as a critical dimension of designing adaptive HCI. The talk demonstrates the ideas with examples of HCI for supporting online reading and group problem solving.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Annett, J.: Feedback and human behaviour: The effects of knowledge of results, incentives and reinforcement on learning and performance (1969)
Billsus, D., Brunk, C.A., Evans, C., Gladish, B., Pazzani, M.: Adaptive interfaces for ubiquitous web access. Commun. ACM 45(5), 34–38 (2002)
Christoff, K., Keramatian, K., Gordon, A.M., Smith, R., Mädler, B.: Prefrontal organization of cognitive control according to levels of abstraction. Brain Res. 1286, 94–105 (2009)
Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., Tullis, T.: Visual hierarchy and viewing behavior: an eye tracking study. In: Jacko, Julie A. (ed.) HCI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 331–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21602-2_36
Feigh, K.M., Dorneich, M.C., Hayes, C.C.: Toward a characterization of adaptive systems a framework for researchers and system designers. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54(6), 1008–1024 (2012)
Hammond, K.R., McClelland, G.H., Mumpower, J.: Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures. Praeger Publishers, New York (1980)
Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, M.S.: Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 64(4), 349 (1979)
Kennedy, M., Te’eni, D., Treleavan, J.: Impacts of decision task, data and display on strategies for extracting information. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 48, 159–180 (1998)
Louis, M.R., Sutton, R.I.: Switching cognitive gears: from habits of mind to active thinking. Hum. Relat. 44(1), 55–76 (1991)
Rasmussen, J.: Information processing and human-machine interaction. An approach to cognitive engineering (1986)
Rittgen, P.: Negotiating models. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 561–573. Springer, June 2007
Ronen, H., Te’eni, D.: The impact of HCI design on health behavior: the case for visual, interactive, personalized (VIP) feedback. In: ICIS 2013, Milan, 16–18 December, 2013 (2013)
Sengupta, K., Te’eni, D.: Cognitive feedback in GDSS: improving control and convergence. MIS Q., 87–113 (1993)
Srinivasan, A., Te’eni, D.: Modeling as constrained problem solving: An empirical study of the data modeling process. Manage. Sci. 41(3), 419–434 (1995)
Sterman, J.D.: Modeling managerial behavior: misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Manage. Sci. 35(3), 321–339 (1989)
Sun, H.: Understanding user revisions when using information system features: adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Q. 36(2), 453–478 (2012)
Te’eni, D.: Analysis and design of process feedback in information systems: Old and new wine in new bottles. Account. Manag. Inform. Technol. 2(1), 1–18 (1992)
Te’eni, D.: Designs that fit: an overview of fit conceptualizations in HCI. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations, pp. 205–221. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk (2006)
Te’eni, D., Sani-Kuperberg, Z.: Levels of abstraction in designs of human–computer interaction: the case of e-mail. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21(5), 817–830 (2005)
Timpf, S., Volta, G.S., Pollock, D.W., Egenhofer, M.J.: A conceptual model of wayfinding using multiple levels of abstraction. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 348–367. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). doi:10.1007/3-540-55966-3_21
Vallacher, R.R., Wegner, D.M.: What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychol. Rev. 94(1), 3 (1987)
Vessey, I., Galletta, D.: Cognitive fit: an empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Syst. Res. 2(1), 63–84 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Te’eni, D. (2017). The Strange Absence of Abstraction Levels in Designing HCI. In: Schoop, M., Kilgour, D. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation. A Socio-Technical Perspective. GDN 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 293. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63545-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63546-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)